Myths & Public Perception

      
Myth - The estate tax redistributes wealth
   
Myth - The estate tax is voluntary
   
Myth - Only the rich pay
   
Myth - Only a few people are rich enough to care
   
Public Perception - National Poll - 'Survey on Taxes and Social Security'
   
Public Perception - National Poll - 'Gay and Lesbian Survey'
   
Public Perception - Survey of the Impact of the Federal Estate Tax on  NAWBO Member Businesses
   
   


 
 
Myth
 
“The estate tax
redistributes wealth”. . .

 
“As this is a tax that does not affect the large public companies, smaller companies competing with these larger concerns must take out reserves to pay for insurance or simply turn over the keys to the awaiting predator at 'firesale prices'. . .   It's time to let the survival of a business depend upon its competitive abilities, not upon the Grim Reaper . . .”
— Jim Hawkins, President, Kenall Manufacturing Company

 
 
 
 


 
 
Myth
 
“The estate tax is voluntary” . . .
 
“Our insurance premiums exceed $300,000 annually. This lowers our profit levels, hence treasury tax receipts.  Further, that $300,000 does nothing to increase our sales, improve productivity or hire new employees.  As an expanding, growing company, these funds could be used much more productively to hire employees, train and expand their skills.”
—James Antunes, President,
A. J. Antunes & Co.

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Myth
 
“Only the rich pay” . . .
 
“At the death of our founder, we spent over $3 million to redeem stock so estate taxes could be paid and control of the company could be maintained.  This was $3 million not available for operations and the division in trouble was sold reducing our employment by about 30 employees and our sales by about $5 million.”
—W. J. Grundy, former chairman, Jomac, Inc.

 
 
 


 
Myth
 
“Only a few people are rich enough to care” . . .
 
“If I do not set up insurance trusts, gift the optimum amount by the IRS, etc., my children will have to sell everything I own, other than the business, to continue operations.  This is not a large company.  We employ 40 people, but that would be 40 people who would lose their jobs if we had to shut down.  If this is the way it is for every other small business owner, then it is more than past time to repeal estate taxes – particularly since taxes have already been paid on all the assets of the estate.”
—Susan McCoy, President, D.B. Williams Company

 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
Public Perception
 
 
National Polls

The Luntz Research Companies - National Survey on Taxes and Social Security - August 1998
 
Most Americans will never pay the Death Tax - but 70% still believe it is one of the most unfair taxes.
 
"People do not work for inherited income, so inheritances should be taxed at a higher rate since it is not earned income."
77% DO NOT AGREE
 
"The estate tax is progressive, and it only affects the wealthiest Americans.  Right now, inheritances of less than $625,000 are not taxed.  Since only wealthy Americans have estates that high, the death tax should not be reduced."  48% DISAGREED, 44% AGREED
 
"Inheritance taxes are an extreme form of taxation.  The tax rate, as high as 55%, is higher than even the highest federal income tax rate-and that's unfair." 85% AGREED
 
 
Percentage of Americans Who Believe Tax is UNFAIR

Social Security Benefits 79%
Savings Account Interest 74%
Death/Inheritance 69%
Long Distance Phone 65%
Capital Gains 48%
Property 47%
Income 46%
Payroll 46%
Gas 43%
Sales 37%
Alternative Minimum 30%
Cigarette 28%
Alcohol and Beer 20%
   

Percentage of Americans Who Believe Tax is FAIR

Alcohol and Beer 76%
Cigarette 69%
Sales 61%
Gas 54%
Income 51%
Property 50%
Payroll 47%
Capital Gains 41%
Long Distance Phone 32%
Death/Inheritance 24%
Savings Account Interest 24%
Alternative Minimum 22%
Social Security Benefits 18%
   


National Polls
 
GAY AND LESBIAN SURVEY - APRIL 2001

MEMORANDUM
 
To: Interested Parties
From: Frank Luntz
Re: The Death Tax & Gay and Lesbian Americans 
Date: April 24, 2001
 
OVERVIEW
 
The message to policymakers from this poll is clear.  Gay and lesbian Americans overwhelmingly think they and their families are discriminated against by the "death tax," and they want this tax abolished.  Fully 80% of the gays and lesbians in this study voted for Gore in the 2000 elections, demonstrating that Republicans and Democrats have found common ground on this issue.  Just as they believe gay families should be subject to the same laws and legal responsibilities as traditional families, they too should share the same rights and benefits. Not only are death taxes perceived as double or triple taxation for gay and lesbian partners and families, but they are strongly viewed as unfair and discriminatory.
 
KEY CONCLUSIONS
 
1) Elimination of the estate tax is a bipartisan issue.  While cutting or eliminating taxes has traditionally been seen as a Republican issue, 83% of gays and lesbians that support death tax repeal were 2000 Gore voters.  Additionally, these same Gore voters overwhelmingly support a candidate that calls for the elimination of death taxes. 
 
Two political candidates with opposing views on death taxes were described to respondents.  They were then asked whom they would vote for if that were all they knew about the candidates. 
Even among self-described gays and lesbians that voted for Al Gore, the results were overwhelmingly in favor of death tax abolition.


Candidate Smith
Death taxes should be eliminated.  They are unfair because they single out those who save and invest for no other reason than because they are successful.  Inheritance taxes are an extreme form of double taxation, and the rate, which can be as high as 55%, is higher than even the highest federal income tax rates. 
 
Candidate Jones
Inheritance taxes should be kept.  Inheritances of less than $675,000 are not taxed, and therefore inheritance taxes affect only the richest two or three percent of Americans.  The wealthy are able to take advantage of tax loopholes to avoid paying their income taxes, and inheritance taxes restore fairness to the system by making up for some of the money that is lost.
 
Now, if that's all you knew about the two candidates,
which one would you support?  (AMONG GORE VOTERS)

 
Candidate Smith    61%
Candidate Jones    30%
Don't Know             9%



2)  The estate tax is discriminatory and should be repealed.  No tax reform package is easier to explain than the repeal of the death tax.  Gay and lesbian respondents clearly understood it and 72% of them believe it is "discriminatory."   When asked if they would support a law to eliminate the estate tax, even though they knew they may not benefit, 82% stated they would. 
 
 
3)  Estate taxes hurt everyone, not just  the wealthy.   When asked whether they agreed or disagreed with various arguments for and against the death tax, several themes emerged.  First, 71% of respondents don't think inheritance should be taxed at a higher rate just because it wasn't earned income and 59% do not believe it's progressive. Second, an overwhelming number of gays and lesbians (81%) polled believe that the death tax is unfair because of the "extreme" tax rate, and a similar percentage (77%) oppose the tax because of the potential for American families to be taxed two or three times. 


GAYS AND LESBIAN DISCUSS THEIR OPINIONS ON ESTATE TAXES

      
  Agree Disagree
"People do not work for inherited income, so inheritances shoule be taxed at a higher rate since it is not earned. 26% 71%
     
"The estate tax is progressive, and it only affects the wealthiest Americans.  Right now, inheritances of less than $675,000 are not taxed.  Since only the richest two or three percent of Americans have estates that high, the death tax should not be reduced." 37% 59%
     
"Inheritance taxes represent double and triple taxation. It is unfair for people to pay taxes on their income, and then more taxes on what they save, and a third time when they die." 77% 20%
     
"Death taxes are unfair because they single out those who save and invest for no reason other than the fact that they became successful and then died." 65% 31%


4)  Make us subject to the same laws but give us the same benefits.  Traditional spouses are exempt from estate taxes, so why aren't we?   The results here are beyond question.  Fully 99% of self-described gays and lesbians believe they should be subject to the same laws as traditional married couples, and 98% believe that they should receive the same benefits as married couples.  And 97% believe that just like traditional married couples, they too should have the right to pass along their assets to their partner without paying up to 55% in death taxes.  This is as close to unanimity as any issue or opinion we have ever tested.   
 

METHODOLOGY
 
Using a nationwide list of likely gays and lesbians, 600 adults were surveyed by telephone from April 7-11, 2001.    The margin of error for this survey is  +/-4%.

                                                                                                             
 
 



Executive Summary


Summarized below are the results of a survey of 272 family-owned and operated businesses which are members of the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO).  The study was sponsored by the Center for the Study of Taxation.  It evaluates the experience of these businesses with the Federal Estate Tax and assesses their expectations about how it will affect their businesses, and the people they employ, over the next five years.
 
KEY FINDINGS
 
In the past five years, family-owned and operated member businesses of NAWBO report that expenditures associated with the Federal Estate Tax have been high.

Three out ot four have incurred expenses related to Federal Estate Tax planning in the five years and average disbursments for all related expenses reach nearly $60,000.
 

Life insurance premiums account for the largest amounts of money spent to date, with average expenditures of approximately $30,000. 

Average spending for actual payment of the Tax is about half that for life insurance premiums, while internal labor costs and attorney/consultant fees fall below this level.
 

Further, the loss of jobs in the past five years resulting from these expenditures has been substantial.
 

Already, an average of 39 positions have been lost per business.  Thus, for just the 272 businesses surveyes, the total number of jobs already list due to the Federal Estate Tax approaches 11,000.
 

In addition, an average of 103 jobs per business that companies could have created over the next five years will not materialize as a result of Federal Estate Tax planning.  Thus for the 272 businesses completing the survey, the total number of additional jobs lost surpasses 28,000.
 

In the event of a sudden death of the principal owner or owners of their company, respondents estimate that the imposition of the Federal Estate Tax would not only result in job loss but would also seriously threaten the viability of their business.
 

Businesses estimate an average loss of nine existing jobs as well as 16 currently planned new positions.
 

Roughly half of the businesses surveyed report that life insurance proceeds would be needed to pay the Federal Estate Tax.
 

Approximately four in 10 claim that...
 

              the Federal Estate Tax would cause plans for expansion to be delayed, substantially curtailed, or abandoned altogether.

              all or part of the business would have to be sold to meet the Federal Estate Tax burden.

             

Slightly more than one-third of respondents indicate that their businesses would have to borrow money to pay the Federal Estate Tax.


CONCLUSIONS
 
The overall effect of the Federal Estate Tax on NAWBO businesses have been to burden them with steep monetary outlays for the planning and payment of the Federal Estate Tax.  Moreover, the Tax has resulted in significant jon losses and will continue to do so.  Further, payment of the Federal Estate Tax could put the very survival of these businesses at risk.
 
Projecting these findings, even on a conservative basis, to all NAWBO businesses reveals that the overall negative impact of the Federal Estate Tax is even more substantial.