Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Government Pension Offset

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 2 of 23. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Washington Post  
The Washington Post

November 27, 2000, Monday, Final Edition

SECTION: METRO; Pg. B02; FEDERAL DIARY

LENGTH: 709 words

HEADLINE: Raises on Track, But Other Efforts May Languish in Lame-Duck Session

BYLINE: Stephen Barr

BODY:


Advocates for a long-term care insurance program for federal employees and retirees are among the big winners of the 106th Congress. The approval of long-term care showed once again that timing can be everything when it comes to Capitol Hill.

Near the end of July, Congress authorized the Office of Personnel Management to establish the insurance program, just before lawmakers departed for the political conventions and their traditional August vacations. The House and Senate approved the bill within a remarkably short span of 2 1/2 hours after a bipartisan group of lawmakers resolved a last-minute glitch over two minor tax-related provisions. Lobbyists from the major insurance companies, the National Association of Retired Federal Employees and the National Treasury Employees Union helped rush the bill through before the recess. If the long-term care legislation had not been approved in July, the new benefit may be languishing on the sidelines as Republicans and Democrats wage their last budget fights in the lame-duck session that starts next week.

Congress, for example, needs to finish work on two major appropriations bills that finance operations at the departments of Commerce, Justice, State, Labor, Education and Health and Human Services. It also will need to revive a spending bill for Treasury Department and legislative branch operations that President Clinton vetoed last month.

As a result, prospects for other bills important to employees and retirees face long odds and may be held over for reintroduction next year. They include:

* Efforts to revise the government pension "offset" that applies to civil service retirements and reduces spousal Social Security benefits. Critics say it hurts low-income retirees, particularly widows. For the first time in many years, the House Social Security subcommittee held a hearing on the issue, and even though there are enough House sponsors to ensure approval--in theory, at least--the measure appears bottled up in the subcommittee.

* House bills to eliminate or modify the "windfall elimination provision," which reduces Social Security benefits of retired federal employees. No hearings were held on the bills.

* Bills to help certain part-time employees who lost retirement annuities when a 1986 law changed retirement formulas, even though Congress apparently intended to grant them immunity from the formula revision.

* Efforts to ease "pay compression" at the top of the Senior Executive Service. A House bill would raise the cap on SES pay and extend "locality pay" to executives and the federal judiciary.

* A bill to provide federal, judicial and congressional employees with a computer and Internet service at home at no charge, similar to perks offered by some large companies.

* Legislation aimed at tracking the costs and savings from contracting out government work. The American Federation of Government Employees has made the legislation one of its top priorities, but business groups strongly oppose the measure.

Other bills, however, might win approval, particularly if they can be attached to one of the spending bills or get cleared for quick voice votes by party leaders.

They include an effort to raise the cap on employee contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan and to raise overtime pay rates for federal firefighters.

By all accounts, Congress and the White House remain on track to give federal employees an average 3.7 percent pay raise next year. A decision on how to distribute locality pay adjustments will probably be made in the next week or two.

Health Insurance Forum

Rep. Constance A. Morella (R-Md.), in cooperation with the Maryland chapters of the National Association of Retired Federal Employees, will sponsor two forums Nov. 29 to discuss federal employee and retiree health insurance choices for 2001.

A morning session will be held from 9:30 to 11:30 a.m. at the National 4-H Center, 7100 Connecticut Ave. in Chevy Chase. The evening session will run from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m. at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11545 Rockville Pike in Rockville. Free parking is available at both locations. For more information, call 202-225-5341.

Stephen Barr's e-mail address is barrs@washpost.com.

LOAD-DATE: November 27, 2000




Previous Document Document 2 of 23. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Government Pension Offset
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.