| |||||||||||||
|
Federal Capsule
106th Congress (1999-2000)
Legislative and Regulatory
Proposals of Interest to NCTR members (as of 12-31-00)
(Bold text
in cells indicates new information)
Issue |
Bill
Number & Sponsor |
Summary |
Status |
Bankruptcy
Reform |
H.R.2415
(new Number) incorporates text of S. 3186 by Sen. Charles Grassley
(R-IA) |
Makes
numerous changes in bankruptcy code, including exemption of all retirement
savings assets from bankruptcy estate. |
House
passed H.R. 2415 (final version) on 10/12/00. Pocket-vetoed by former President
Clinton. |
“Pay to Play”
Proposed Rules |
Not
Applicable - regulatory proposal |
The
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued proposed regulations on
August 8, 1999 that would bar any investment advisor who makes a campaign
contribution to a government official from doing business with the
governmental entity that the official represents for 2 years. The proposal is called "Pay to
Play." The deadline for
comments was November 1. |
SEC
reviewing comments, but may re-think its approach, according to news
accounts. |
Pension
Reform |
|
|
|
Ø
Portability of
Voluntary Savings Vehicles through Eliminating Barriers in Rollover
Rules. |
H.R.
2614 (new number) incorporates text of H.R. 5592 “Taxpayer Relief Act of
2000” by Rep. Dick Armey (R-TX) and several other bills. |
Would
allow portability of retirement assets between all plans when employees
change jobs, including 403(b) and 457 plans, but note following
limitations on 457s. The bill
would require the 457 plan administrator to separately account for amounts
rolled into such plan from other eligible retirement plans (e.g., 403(b)s,
401(k)s). If the
administrator does not do so, the plan could not accept transfers or
rollovers from such other plans.
A distribution from a state or local government 457 would be
treated as a distribution from a qualified retirement plan described in
IRC Section 4974 (c)(1) [i.e., a qualified plan under IRC Section 401(a)]
to the extent that such distribution is attributable to an amount
transferred to an eligible deferred compensation plan from a qualified
retirement plan. Early
withdrawal tax would apply to distributions attributable to amounts rolled
over to a 457 plan from a qualified plan. Effective date: Distributions after December 31,
2000. No penalty is imposed on a plan for failure to provide information
in required notice with respect to any distribution made before January 1,
2002, if plan administrator makes a reasonable attempt to comply with
requirement. |
Passed
House 10/26/00. No further action before
adjournment. |
Issue |
Bill
Number & Sponsor |
Summary |
Status |
Ø
Use
of 403(b)/457 Assets for Purchase of Service Credits in Public Sector
Defined Benefit Plans |
H.R.
1102, Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act, by Rep.
Rob Portman (R-OH) and Rep. Ben Cardin (D-MD) |
Would
permit funds from 403(b) and 457 plans to be used to purchase permissive
service credits in public sector defined benefit plans. Effective date: Transfers after Dec. 31,
2000. |
Passed
House 10/26/00. No further action before
adjournment. |
Ø
Liberalizing
Defined Benefit Limits |
H.R.
1102, Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act, by Rep.
Rob Portman (R-OH) and Rep. Ben Cardin (D-MD) |
Would
set the annual benefit limit for defined benefit plans to $160,000
(indexed). Would set the
amount of compensation that may be taken into account under qualified
retirement plans to $200,000 (indexed). Effective date: Years beginning
after Dec. 31, 2000. |
Passed
House 10/26/00. No further action before
adjournment. |
Ø
Increasing
Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Limits |
H.R.
1102, Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act, by Rep.
Rob Portman (R-OH) and Rep. Ben Cardin (D-MD) |
Would
increase the annual elective deferral limit for 401(k), 403(b), and 457
plans as follows:
Taxable year:
Applicable $ amt.: 2001
$11,000 2002
$12,000 2003
$13,000 2004
$14,000 2005 or thereafter
$15,000
For
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005, the amount is generally
indexed as under current law.
Would increase the annual contribution limit under 415(c) to
$40,000 (indexed). Effective
date: Years beginning after
December 31, 2000. |
Passed
House 10/26/00. No further action
before adjournment. |
Ø
Repealing
457 Coordination
Requirements |
H.R.
1102, Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act, by Rep.
Rob Portman (R-OH) and Rep. Ben Cardin (D-MD) |
Would
repeal coordination requirements for 457 plans. Effective for years beginning
after December 31, 2000. |
Passed
House 10/26/00. No further action before
adjournment. |
Ø
Eliminating
Percent of Compensation Limit |
H.R.
1102, Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act, by Rep.
Rob Portman (R-OH) and Rep. Ben Cardin (D-MD) |
Would
increase the compensation-based limits on defined contribution plans from
25% to 100% of compensation; would eliminate the exclusion allowance
applicable to 403(b)s and substitute the applicable 415 limit; and would
increase the compensation-based amounts on 457 plans from 33% to 100% of
"includable compensation."
Effective date: Years
beginning after Dec. 31, 2000. |
Passed House 10/26/00. No further action before adjournment. |
Issue |
Bill
Number & Sponsor |
Summary |
Status |
Ø
Clarifying
Treatment of 457 Domestic Relation Orders |
H.R.
1102, Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act, by Rep.
Rob Portman (R-OH) and Rep. Ben Cardin (D-MD) |
Provides
equitable tax treatment to Section 457 domestic relations order
distributions, clarifying that the recipient of the funds will bear the
tax rather than the plan participant. Effective date: applies to amounts
after Dec. 31, 2000. |
Passed
House 10/26/00. No further action before
adjournment. |
Social
Security |
|
|
|
Ø
Government
Pension Offset (GPO) |
H.R.1217
by Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA); S.717 by Sen. Barbara Mikluski
(D-MD) |
To
lessen the effect of the GPO by making it applicable only if the spouse's
or surviving spouse's Social Security and government pension combined
exceeds $1,200 a month. The
offset reduces the amount of an individual's Social Security spouse's or
widow's benefits by two-thirds of the amount of his/her government
pension. In other words, if
an individual gets a monthly public pension of $600, two-thirds of that,
or $400, must be used to offset the Social Security spouse's or widow's
benefits. If he/she is
eligible for a $500 widow's benefit, he/she will receive $100 per month
from Social Security ($500-$400=$100). |
H.R.1217
pending before House Ways and Means Committee 3/23/99; S.717 pending
before Senate Finance Committee 3/25/99. Hearings before Social Security
Subcommittee of House Ways and Means Committee 6/27/2000. No further action before
adjournment. |
Ø
Windfall
Elimination Provision (WEP) |
H.R.860
by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) |
Restricts
application of WEP to individual's whose combined monthly income from the
individual's primary insurance amount (i.e., his/her Social Security
benefit) and the portion of the monthly periodic payment attributable to
noncovered service performed after 1956 exceeds $2000. It also provides for graduated
implementation of WEP by specified percentages with respect to incremental
amounts above such threshold, up to 100% for combined amounts over
$3000. WEP primarily affects
people who spent most of their careers working for a government agency,
but who also worked at other jobs where they paid Social Security taxes
long enough to qualify for retirement or disability benefits. |
Pending
before the House Ways and Means Committee 2/25/99. No further action before
adjournment. |
Ø
Mandatory
Social Security Coverage of State and Local Governments |
S.21
by Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY)* |
Imposes
mandatory coverage for newly hired state and local government employees as
of Dec. 31, 2001 |
Pending
before Senate Finance Committee - hearings held 3/16/99. No further action before
adjournment. Issue |
Issue |
Bill
Number & Sponsor |
Summary |
Status |
|
H.R.249
by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC)* |
Same
except change is effective for service performed beginning after Dec. 31,
1997. |
Pending
before House Ways and Means Committee - Social Security subcommittee
2/12/99. No further action before
adjournment. |
|
H.R.3206
by Rep. Nick Smith (R-MI)* |
Same
except change is effective for service performed beginning after Dec.
2000 |
Pending
before House Ways and Means Committee - Social Security subcommittee
11/13/99. No further action before
adjournment. |
Ø
Reform |
S.21
by Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) |
Provides
for a normal retirement age of 65.
Creates a "Voluntary Investment Fund" in the Treasury. Employees designate a "Voluntary
Investment Account" (VIA) into which contributions will be deposited on
their behalf. Employees
contribute 1% of wages and the employer matches that rate. Self-employed
make a 2% contribution based on their wages. The plan also provides for reduced
FICA rates through 2029 and a reallocation of employment taxes through
2059 to keep trust funds in actuarial balance |
Pending
before Senate Finance Committee - hearings held 3/16/99. No further action before
adjournment. |
|
H.R.1793
by Reps. Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) & Charles Stenholm (D-TX) |
Creates
individual retirement savings accounts in which employees can invest a
portion of their FICA taxes to supplement their Social Security
benefit. Accounts would be
owned by individuals and administered by the government. Additionally, the retirement age
would gradually be increased to 67 years by 2011. (Under current law, retirement age
increases to age 67 in 2027.) |
Pending
before the House Ways and Means Committee 5/13/99. No further action before
adjournment. |
|
S.1383
by Sens. Judd Gregg (R-NH) & John Breaux (D-LA) |
Similar,
in some respects, to H.R 1793. |
Pending
before Senate Finance Committee 7/16/99. No further action before
adjournment. |
Issue |
Bill
Number & Sponsor |
Summary |
Status |
|
Proposal
by Reps. Bill Archer (R-TX) & Clay Shaw (R-FL) |
Does
not increase the retirement age.
Reserves 100% of Social Security payroll taxes for Social
Security. Maintains current
system including benefits with no privatization. Creates a Social Security
Guarantee Account (SSGA) in which employees would deposit money from the
income tax credit equal to 2% of their wages. Individuals will be given low-risk
investment options in which to invest their funds. No early withdrawals would be
allowed. Payroll taxes would
be reduced in 2050 and 2060. |
Not
introduced before adjournment. |
Ø
Repeal
of Social Security Earnings Limit |
H.R.
5 – Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act, by Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX) |
Repeals
earnings limit for those aged 65 through 69. Under current law, individuals in
that age bracket who are both drawing a Social Security benefit and
continuing to work lose $1 in benefits for every $3 they earn in wages
above a certain limit, which is $17,000 in 2000. The repeal will not apply to
individuals aged 62 through 64 who are drawing an early Social Security
benefit and continuing to work.
The repeal is effective for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31,
1999, so it is retroactive.
Note: the repeal will
directly affect those states that use the earnings limit to cap the amount
of salary a retired individual may work in post-retirement employment
without losing his/her pension benefit. |
The
President signed the bill on 4/7/00.
It became public law # 106-182. |
*These
bills also include other changes to the Social Security System.