Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: "Conservation and Reinvestment Act", House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 25 of 92. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.  
Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony

May 03, 1999

SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 971 words

HEADLINE: TESTIMONY May 03, 1999 MURPHY J. "MIKE" FOSTER GOVERNOR STATE OF LOUISIANA HOUSE RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND REINVESTMENT

BODY:
May 3, 1999 Testimony for the United States House Committee on Resources Submitted by Governor Murphy J. "Mike" Foster State of Louisiana Mr. Chairman and Honorable Members of the Committee, welcome to Louisiana. Thank you for taking your time to travel here to learn about this important issue from Louisianians that represent a number of interests in our state. To my friends, Congressmen Billy Tauzin and Chris John, thank you for all your efforts on behalf of our state and its people. Mr. Chairman, the State of Louisiana strongly supports the enactment of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act of 1999, H.R. 701. This legislation addresses both an inequity and a great need of our state. First, I'll address the inequity. The Federal government has not been fair with the State of Louisiana when it comes to the return of Federal mineral revenues to states that are impacted directly by Federal mineral development. The problem is that the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 shares 50% of the onshore Federal mineral receipts with the states, but the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act shares only a fraction of the revenues from those Federal offshore leases located closest to the adjacent coastal state and has done that only since 1986. In fiscal year 1997, rive states received from the Federal government more Federal mineral revenues than did Louisiana, yet the Federal mineral receipts from offshore Louisiana were over rive times greater than the amount of mineral revenues from any of these rive states. For example, from onshore New Mexico, the Federal government received $341 million and returned $167 million to the state. The Federal government received $489 million from Wyoming and returned $237 million to the state. These funds were distributed automatically, with no restriction on use, and were not subject to appropriation by Congress. Now, what about Louisiana? Louisiana provided the support for $2.7 billion in Federal receipts from offshore oil and gas development on the Louisiana OCS in fiscal year 1997. Louisiana received in return only $21.1 million - one-tenth of Wyoming's receipts and one-eighth of New Mexico's receipts. In addition, these states collected severance tax on the production of the Federal minerals that were produced in their states, but Louisiana cannot collect severance taxes on the Federal oil and gas produced on the Louisiana OCS. If you look at the cumulative numbers since 1920, the Federal government has received from onshore New Mexico S5.4 billion and returned to the state S2.6 billion. The Federal government has received from onshore Wyoming S7.8 billion and returned to the state S3.9 billion. From Louisiana, combining onshore revenues since 1920 and offshore revenues since 1953, the Federal government has received S49.9 billion and has returned less than $900 thousand to the state. That means that New Mexico and Wyoming have received about 50% of what they have contributed, while Louisiana has received less than 2%. By anyone's count, those numbers represent a great inequity. H.R. 701 will partially correct this injustice by sharing with Louisiana about 10% of the annual revenues from Federal oil and gas development from the Louisiana OCS. Mr. Chairman, correcting this current inequity to Louisiana Will also help us address some major needs of our state and the nation. Number one is the restoration of our coastal wetlands and barrier islands. We have lost 1,000 square miles of our coastal land in the last 50 years and are projected to lose another 1,000 square miles in the next 50 years. Our coastal wetlands are unique and cannot be replaced as a natural resource of this nation. Federal oil and gas operations and the thousands of miles of pipelines that cut across our coast, not to mention the wear and tear on our highways, have contributed to our coastal losses and infrastructure damage. Many of those roads are not only conduits for our nation's oil and gas related industries, but also serve as the only hurricane evacuation routes for our citizens. The nation receives billions of dollars in revenues at great cost to Louisiana's coastal towns and cities, our people and their unique culture. The State has a plan called Coast 2050 that will prevent much of our projected land loss and will significantly enhance our current efforts to save and rebuild our coastline. But the plan is expensive: almost $14 billion over the next 50 years. This legislation will provide the money to help us implement the Coast 2050 program. The cost of not doing what needs to be done would be catastrophic to our state and nation. Recognize that this legislation will be good for every state in the Union, and we in Louisiana are proud of our contribution to the nation through the Federal dollars we've helped generate. I'd also like to express my support of both Titles II and HI of this bill. Louisiana will benefit from these, especially Title III, which will go far to ensure the conservation of non-game species before they become endangered. We have gone through the challenge of bringing back the Brown Pelican and the alligator from the endangered species list. Both are now thriving in Louisiana, thanks in great part to our Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. I have asked my secretary of Wildlife and Fisheries to submit additional comments on Titles II and III to be included as part of the record. Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee, all three titles of this bill are vitally important. Our state has borne the brunt of 90% of the Federal offshore mineral development, and it is time to provide relief. Please make the enactment of H.R. 701 in 1999 a priority of this committee and of each of you individually. Please be fair to Louisiana in the final version of the bill that is enacted by this Congress.

LOAD-DATE: May 11, 1999




Previous Document Document 25 of 92. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: "Conservation and Reinvestment Act", House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.