Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: "Lands Legacy Initiative", House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 73 of 118. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

MARCH 10, 1999, WEDNESDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 2291 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED STATEMENT OF
DAN GLICKMAN
SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
BEFORE THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
INTERIOR SUBCOMMITTEE

BODY:

Mr. Chairman, Congressman Dicks, and members of the Subcommittee, thank you for inviting me here today to discuss the fiscal year 2000 (FY 00) budget for the Forest Service.
Last year when I appeared before you, I noted that forest policy involved controversial issues, and that the vigorous public debate over how we manage our national forests signified Americans' deep care and concern about their forests and natural resources. Well, a vigorous debate over these issues certainly took place last year, especially during development and enactment of our FY 99 Appropriation Bill, and after all of that I want to thank you for your efforts in getting the bill passed.
About one and a half years ago, I gave Mike Dombeck the assignment: Develop a natural resources agenda for the 21st Century. Last year he announced that agenda, emphasizing four areas: watershed health and restoration, sustainable forest management, recreation, and forest roads. The Administration followed up on the agenda asking for funding in the FY 99 budget, a legislative proposal stabilizing payments to states, and proposals dealing with short and long-term management of forest roads. For FY 00, we again are using the agenda to establish spending, legislative, and management priorities.
Overall, we are requesting $2.8 billion for Forest Service discretionary spending in FY 00. This is a 6.5 percent increase over this year's appropriation.
I. Watershed Health and Restoration
Water has always played a prominent role in the management of our national forests. The Organic Act of 1897 designated "securing favorable conditions of water flows" as one of the primary purposes for establishing the national forests. Besides the wildlife dependent on clean water, communities, especially in the West, depend on healthy forested watersheds for their clean sources of drinking water.
More than 50 percent of the water in our Nation originates from and flows through forested lands, underscoring why the Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its programs are so critical in cleaning our Nation's water. From the forested headwaters to the cities, the Forest Service, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the Farm Service Agency (FSA) have an impressive array of programs to protect and improve our waters.
The Forest Service budget increases the President's Clean Water Action Plan funding $89 million over the FY 99 appropriated level. In FY 99, the agency is restoring 1,837 miles of streams, and anticipates restoring 2,800 additional miles with this funding. During FY 99, the Forest Service is obliterating, closing or decommissioning 3,000 miles of roads; in 2000, the Forest Service plans to decommission an additional 3,301) miles. The Forest Service is handling the characterization or cleanup of 71 hazardous substance sites in FY 99 and will do 79 more in FY 0(). All these accomplishments will mean less pollutants ruining streams and more clean water for us, wildlife, and the forests.
II. Sustainable Forest Management
The Administration continues to promote sustainable management of our national forests with important help from the Congress. For example, the FY 99 appropriation included significant increases in the range and soil, water, and air programs, and we are proposing increases in those programs again this year. We also are proposing a new $15 million pilot forest health stewardship program to test new techniques to restore and improve the health, diversity, and productivity of the land.
To improve forest planning, I appointed a Committee of Scientists to advise the Department on how best to revise the land management planning regulations to give land managers more flexibility, to reduce costs and best protect the resources. Revision of these regulations is long overdue. I expect to receive the Committee's recommendations shortly. Then the proposed planning regulations will be available for public review and comment. For FY 00, I am confident we finally can provide regulations that will lead to land management planning based on the best science, the most comprehensive public comment, and that will leave the land in better condition for future generations. We will then get on with the job of bringing our forests' land management plans up to date in a manner that meets the public's expectations and includes the best science to ensure long-term sustainability of the land.
Last year, the budget proposed to revise the payments to states program to bring stability to local governments' funding for county roads and schools. Under the receipt-sharing formula, these payments have been declining for most of the last decade. The special legislation enacted for the spotted owl forests also provides for annually decreasing payments which currently end after 2003. It is time to set a new policy: Communities near forests should not suffer cutbacks for schools and roads due to declines in timber harvest levels on Federal lands.
In his State of the Union address, the President stated that "all our communities face a preservation challenge as they grow, and green space shrinks." To help meet this challenge, his Lands Legacy Initiative continues the Administration's vigorous efforts to save America's natural treasures.
There is a real "land crunch" affecting many parts of the Nation. This includes some entire states, most municipalities, and even many small communities.' These areas are in real jeopardy of losing much of their open space and fertile land to suburban sprawl. Working lands are being converted to suburban sprawl daily. By the time the owner of the last farm, forest, or ranch finds himself or herself surrounded by suburban or second home development, it is too late to maintain a viable working land base and infrastructure of suppliers, processing facilities and cooperating networks of neighboring producers. States and localities need to be able to act on their citizens' concerns about the reduced availability of open space. We need to provide options for dealing with this growing problem tailored to the specific needs of each local area. Providing States and localities with an array of tools to utilize will make their job easier in gaining the cooperation of landowners.
In some cases Federal ownership patterns are a factor in the preservation of open space. There are times when we need to purchase critical parcels on a willing-seller basis. Land acquisition money is necessary for purchasing our Nation's last treasures and for buying important inholdings in wilderness areas, wild and scenic river corridors, national recreation areas and other places specially designated by the President or the Congress. Often the opportunity to purchase a critical site may occur only once every couple of generations, and we need the flexibility to take advantage of such opportunities. The initiative proposes significant new resources to states and local communities to help preserve irreplaceable pieces of our natural legacy, keeping them within easy reach of every citizen. The budget proposes Forest Service land acquisition at the FY 99 level of $118 million, a critical part of the President's initiative.

In addition, the budget proposes $62 million from the Land and Water Conservation Fund in increases for the Forest Legacy and Urban and Community Forestry Programs as well as for a new Smart Growth Partnership to promote land stewardship and community development. Finally, the budget of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, pending before the Agriculture Subcommittee, requests $50 million for Farmland Protection.
The El Nino and La Nina patterns in recent years and their influence on wildfires and insect and disease outbreaks underscore our need to understand the effects of climate patterns on the health and productivity of our Nation's forests. The Climate Change Technology Initiative will develop methods to increase the carbon sequestration and the fiber production capacity of our forests, while contributing to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Global Change Initiative will improve our ability to monitor and manage effects of climate changes on carbon release, carbon storage, and forest health and production. This research is critical to understanding how forests contribute to ameliorating climate change as well as how damaging climate change can be to our forests.
III. Recreation
The American public's demand for quality outdoor recreation experiences on the national forests continues to grow, at a time when we have difficulty providing adequate funding to pick up the garbage and do routine maintenance, let alone make long-needed investments to reduce the backlog of deferred maintenance and reconstruction needs. Nonetheless we have managed to avoid reducing most recreation programs, and have provided a 24 percent increase in funding for wilderness management.
The Forest Service is looking at alternative funding mechanisms for recreation and will work with you and others on this in the coming year. For example, one source of increased revenues is the recreation fee demonstration program. While the FY 99 appropriation extended the pilot program through FY 01, the FY 00 budget proposes to make the program permanent. The Administration is also proposing legislation to permit the Forest Service to retain fees charged for commercial filming, and concession reform measures to help supplement the funding of our recreation programs.
IV. Roads
Last year the Department announced a major initiative in the management of Forest Service roads. We recognize the road system is an integral part of the transportation network in many rural areas -- crucial to recreation and essential for the operation of our timber and minerals programs. However, we simply have more roads than we can afford or need on the national forests. We badly need to restore degraded roads to maintain and improve watershed health and public safety. The FY 00 budget proposes an increase of 23 percent in funding for road maintenance and decommissioning, while funding road construction and reconstruction at about the FY 99 level.
However, with an estimated backlog of more than $8 billion of road maintenance and reconstruction needs, we cannot solve our road problems by trying to increase funding under current budget constraints. That is one of the reasons I strongly support Chief Dombeck's recent decision to impose an eighteen-month moratorium on road building in certain roadless areas while the agency develops a long-term roads strategy. The moratorium will take what are often the most expensive and most controversial road construction projects off the table while the agency analyzes its road inventory and future needs and engages in a public dialogue on the long term strategy which we expect to publish later this year. 383,000 miles of roads, enough to circle the globe many times over, is a tragic legacy when many of the roads cannot be maintained properly and cause environmental damage. This is something we should begin fixing, and I believe that we are on the right path.
V. Accountability
I strongly believe that undergirding these four agenda items is the need for more agency accountability, particularly financial accountability. It goes part and parcel with managing public lands. Chief Dombeck has kept his promise to me to establish an experienced financial management team to develop a strategy for fixing the problems that exist. We now have that team and strategy in place. I look forward to working with you on accountability issues over the next year.
VI. Civil Rights
I also would like to mention my on-going efforts to address civil rights concerns. As Secretary of Agriculture, I am committed to ensuring the civil rights of USDA's customers and employees. Every customer and every employee must be treated fairly and equitably, with dignity and respect. There are no exceptions. The Department has had serious problems in this area in the past. The class action settlement with African American farmers that was proposed in January will close a painful chapter in USDA's history but does not complete our civil rights initiative. We still have more to do. The Forest Service is the largest employer in the Department and its employees deal with a large and diverse constituency. I fully expect the Forest Service, no less than any other agency, to devote the time, staff and resources necessary to achieve these objectives, and I am happy to report that the Forest Service is doing so. The agency has made much progress in this area, but it still faces many challenges in certain regions that we will be working to overcome.
Conclusion
Chief Dombeck has put the Forest Service on the right track with a natural resource agenda that places the health of the land as a top priority, while being sensitive to the needs of local communities. The Administration has proposed the funding necessary to support this agenda. However, neither the Administration nor the Congress can adequately fund the Forest Service under the existing spending restrictions without looking at possible offsetting adjustments. To partially defray the cost of Forest Service programs, a diverse array of legislative proposals and administrative measures are being developed which will offset some of the increases in funding proposed for Forest Service activities. These include a timber user fee proposal and measures which will permit the agency to retain some of its receipts for resource program uses. The legislative proposals will be sent to the Congress soon for consideration.
Once again, thank you for asking me to be here. I will be glad to answer any questions you may have.
END


LOAD-DATE: March 12, 1999




Previous Document Document 73 of 118. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: "Lands Legacy Initiative", House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.