Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: coastal W/10 impact W/10 assistance, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 38 of 44. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

JANUARY 27, 1999, WEDNESDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 1679 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF
DR. DONALD F. OLTZ
STATE GEOLOGIST OF ALABAMA
BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

BODY:

Mr. Chairman, thank you for the invitation to appear here today. I am Don Oltz, State Geologist of Alabama. In my position as Supervisor of the State Oil and Gas Board of Alabama, I have regulatory authority for oil and gas operations in Alabama. As Director of the Geological Survey of Alabama, I head an agency which provides current, competent, and complete information and research on Alabama energy, minerals, water, and biology. Also, I am the current vice chairman of Minerals Management Service(MMS) Outer Continental Shelf (0CS) Policy Committee and was one of the votes to move the assistance concept to the Department of the Interior. I also have many years' experience in the oil and gas industry. Today I would like to provide a short summary of the OCS Policy Committee's report on coastal impact assistance, briefly touch on how Alabama handles current income from OCS activities, and then discuss how offshore exploration and production activities for natural gas and oil impact the coastal area of Alabama.
The OCS Policy Committee was established to provide advice to the Secretary of the Interior through the MMS on policy issues related to oil and natural gas activities on the OCS. Members represent the coastal states and constituencies impacted by federal OCS programs. At the Spring 1997 meeting, the OCS Policy Committee reiterated its support for impact assistance and revenue sharing to coastal states and communities directly affected by oil and gas development. The MMS asked the OCS Policy Committee to develop a proposal to implement an impact assistance program. The resulting report entitled, "Coastal Impact Assistance" was approved by the OCS Policy Committee and transmitted to the Secretary of the Interior.
The OCS Policy Committee report identified two fundamental justifications for a revenue sharing or impact assistance program: (1) mitigate the various impacts of OCS activities and (2) support sustainable development of nonrenewable resources. The committee report states that" 'OCS development can.., affect community infrastructure, social services and the environment in ways that cause concerns among residents of coastal States and communities.' These effects cannot be entirely eliminated and they underscore the fact that, while the benefits of the OCS program are national, a disproportionate share of the infrastructure, environmental and social costs are local."
Impacts listed in the OCS Policy Committee report are:
- the need for infrastructure, such as ports, roads, water and sewer facilities, to support expanded economic activity accompanying OCS development;
- the need for public services, such as schools, recreation facilities, and other social services, to support the population growth accompanying OCS development;
- the need to mitigate the effects of occasional accidents (e.g., oil spills) or cumulative air, water, and solid waste discharges on coastal and marine resources and on the economic activities (e.g., tourism and fisheries) that depend on those resources;
- the need to mitigate the physical impact of OCS activities (e.g., pipelines, wakewash, road traffic, canal digging, and dredging) on sensitive coastal environments,
- the visual impact on residents and tourists from production platforms and facilities, waste disposal sites, pipeline rights of way, canals, etc.; and
- the costs to State and local governments of effective participation in OCS planning and decision-making processes and permitting, licensing, and monitoring onshore activities that support offshore development.
Mr. Chairman, I thought it might be informative to briefly mention revenues the State currently receives from oil and gas production including the offshore. In Alabama, severance taxes are charged on natural gas production. A two percent production tax and a six percent privilege tax are assessed on all production. The counties from which the production is severed receive 25 to 30 percent of the privilege tax. The majority of severance tax revenues are deposited in the State General Fund which supports all noneducational State programs. Two trust funds have been established that receive offshore revenues. The Alabama and Heritage Trust Funds will be merged in 2001 and currently have a combined corpus of 1.61 billion dollars. These funds include royalties and other revenues derived from State waters and all 8 (g) revenues. Investment income last year approached 122 million dollars which was transferred to the State's General Fund.
Now I would like to focus on Alabama and discuss how offshore exploration and production activities for natural gas and oil impact our coastal area. Our coastal area comprises two counties: Mobile and Baldwin. Mobile County is more populated and has a strong industrial base which includes: paper products, ship building, aviation, chemicals, lumber products, textiles, seafood processing, and oil and gas production. Baldwin County is less populated but has the fastest growing population in the State.Retail trade and real estate are the industries which support a strong and growing tourist industry.
Natural gas was discovered in Alabama State waters in 1979. Additional discoveries of natural gas in Alabama state waters led to natural gas discoveries in the OCS off Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida. Offshore production platforms, pipelines and onshore processing facilities were established to allow for production of these very large natural gas reserves. Production from Alabama State waters and the OCS off Mississippi and Alabama constitutes a significant contribution to U.S. energy production. We fully expect the infrastructure necessary to produce these energy resources will continue to expand offshore and onshore Alabama.
Currently, gas production offshore Alabama occurs within the 3-mile state coastal waters, in the federal-state shared "8 (g)" area and beyond the 6-mile "8 (g)" boundary. Over a billion and a half (1.5 bcf) cubic feet of gas are brought onshore every day in south Mobile County, Alabama. This gas originates from offshore Alabama, Mississippi, and soon, possibly Florida. Alabama has over 100 industries that participate in the construction and operation of offshore drilling rigs. New drilling and production technology will expand exploration and production operations into very deep water. Geologic creativity continues to expand the number of "plays" so that more and more prospects are being drilled. New plays currently being developed in OCS waters include the oil-prone deep water flex play and the Cretaceous carbonate trend offshore Mississippi and Alabama.
Alabama infrastructure needs for maintaining current and future Gulf of Mexico drilling and production include:
1. Roads. Alabama has to widen a two-lane road south of 1-10 toward the gulf to add lanes to handle increased industrial traffic. One source of some of that traffic is tankers carrying molten sulfur. We have four gas-processing plants in three locations in Alabama; these plants send out 25 to 30 tracks laden with 400 to 500 long tons of molten sulfur each day. (Sulfur is removed from the "sour" gas prior to entering sales lines.) Many of the 100+ industries supporting offshore oil and gas activities also deliver their products to facilities on the coast over Alabama roads.

2. Docks and Port Facilities. The Mobile area port facilities service much of the OCS exploration and production operations offshore Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida.
3. New Pipelines. As projected production increases occur, new pipelines will need to be brought onshore Alabama. In some areas they may cross coastal wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas. The current plans to add natural gas liquids plants will also increase current daily throughput and the need for new pipelines.
4. Accumulations to Federal Production. In the interest of efficiency, some federal production may be commingled with state production prior to pipelining. Metering and allowables will become an additional administrative issue for the Alabama State Oil and Gas Board.
5. Viewshed Issues. Residents of coastal communities have complained about the visual impacts of offshore exploration and production facilities.
6. Boat and Air Traffic. Helicopters, crews and supply boats operate out of onshore or nearshore bases. Alabama has a tremendous offshore fishing and shrimping industry that compete in the flow of traffic.7. Air Quality. The south-coastal air basin has air quality problems. Some contributions that impact air quality may be related to onshore processing, truck traffic, etc.
8. Oil Spills. All of Alabama's state and "8 (g)" production is gas. Deep water production will introduce oil production into the infrastructure of coastal Alabama. Alabama needs support for state coastal-based response teams because of increased exposure of risk not contemplated by current planning.
9. Labor and Associated Infrastructure. Increased jobs brings increased needs for schools, hospitals, water treatment plants, sewers, etc. Some socioeconomic studies are in progress to address these and other related issues.
In closing, Senate Bill 25 is designed to provide Coastal Impact Assistance to State and local governments in order to mitigate adverse environmental and public service impacts incurred due to OCS development. Alabama has produced over 1 tcf of gas. I think industry people throw numbers around that are sometimes hard to envision: 1 mmcf or 1.5 bcf/day or 5,000 bopd; 1 tcf of gas will cover the area of a football field vertically for 2800 miles. As I have described, Alabama is currently being impacted by offshore development activities in a variety of ways and we are carrying more than our share of the burden. It would be appropriate for the State of Alabama and local governments to receive additional revenues that could be used to mitigate adverse environmental and public service impacts incurred due to OCS development. I appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. Thank you.
END


LOAD-DATE: January 29, 1999




Previous Document Document 38 of 44. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: coastal W/10 impact W/10 assistance, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.