Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: "Conservation and Reinvestment Act", House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 21 of 92. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.  
Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony

May 04, 1999

SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 479 words

HEADLINE: TESTIMONY May 04, 1999 MAX CLELAND SENATE ENERGY & NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND REINVESTMENT

BODY:
STATEMENTOF SENATOR MAX CLELAND (D-GA) BEFORE THE SENATE ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE HEARING CONCE'RNING S.25. The Conservation and Reinvestment Act; and S. 446, the Resources 2000 Act Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to thank you all for arranging a hearing on these important bills. I was very pleased to be an original co-sponsor of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act during the 105th Congress and was happy to once again co- sponsor the bill this year. I would like to thank Senators Landrieu and Murkowski for their leadership on this matter. I would also like to thank my colleagues for allowing Mr. David Waller the opportunity to speak before the Committee. Mr. Waller is a superb resource for the Fish and Wildlife Agency Community and Georgia is very proud and fortunate to have had him as Director of our state's Wildlife Resources Division since 1990 and with the Department for nearly 30 years. David contacted me over two years ago to inform and educate my office about the merits and need for a project called Teaming with Wildlife, specifically how the project would provide a much needed funding source for the management of non-game species. As you will certainly discover, David's great passion, focus and commitment to purpose made it very easy to realize the merits of his cause. Unfortunately, because the Teaming with Wildlife proposal became burdened with the stigma of being called a new tax bill, the opportunity for the full Senate to hear the merits of tile proposal were stifled. Thus, I was extremely excited when David informed me that the proposal had been attached to the Conservation and Reinvestment Act. I was pleased to discover that the Conservation and Reinvestment Act had other provisions which I supported, including increased funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund at both the federal and local levels, and provisions to protect and restore our coastal habitats. Although Georgia does not have a large percentage of offshore oil receipts, which correspondingly decreased the amount of financial resources the State would receive under Title I of the bill, I co-sponsored the Conservation and Reinvestment Act because I strongly supported the Title III provisions. Moreover. I believe that those Coastal States which contribute the most to Outer Continental Shelf revenues should benefit from a greater percentage of these receipts than those states which did not. In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, I believe that the Conservation and Reinvestment Act provides valuable improvements in the federal government's distribution of conservation program resources which will be of great benefit to both natural resources and wildlife in America. Once again. Mr. Chairman, I thank you and the other honorable members of this Committee for this opportunity and w ill now yield to my good friend David Waller.

LOAD-DATE: May 5, 1999




Previous Document Document 21 of 92. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: "Conservation and Reinvestment Act", House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.