HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 137 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Denver Post Corporation  
The Denver Post

July 21, 2000 Friday 2D EDITION

SECTION: DENVER & THE WEST; Pg. B-06

LENGTH: 534 words

HEADLINE: Campbell lambastes land-buy bill as 'socialism' Measure would provide purchase of property for variety of public uses

BYLINE: By Mike Soraghan, Denver Post Washington Bureau,

BODY:
WASHINGTON - U.S. Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell on Thursday  came out against a bill targeting billions of dollars for open  space, hiking trails and soccer fields. He says Congress should  have more say over how the money is spent.

'This bill reeks of socialism,' Campbell said Thursday in  announcing his decision. 'It cedes the constitutional authority of  the legislative branch to midlevel bureaucrats.'

The Conservation and Reinvestment Act (CARA) bill would take  nearly $ 3 billion a year from offshore oil-drilling revenues and  put it toward buying public land. Supporters say it would send  more than $ 57 million to Colorado. It would also put millions more  dollars into increasing 'payments in-lieu of taxes' to local  governments with federal land in their boundaries.

Campbell is a key vote on the bill because he sits on the  Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee that must approve it  before it can get to the Senate floor.

Campbell's decision was quickly denounced by the coalition of  environmentalists, local governments and sporting-goods  manufacturers pushing hard for the program.

They say Campbell is ignoring Coloradans' love of open space  and recreation.

'This is a vote against the health of outdoor businesses and  the public's desire for more open space,' said Frank Hugelmeyer,  executive director of the Boulder-based Outdoor Recreation  Coalition of America.

The bill has been supported by several other Colorado  Republicans, including Gov. Bill Owens and U.S. Reps. Tom Tancredo  of Littleton, Scott McInnis of Grand Junction and Joel Hefley of  Colorado Springs.

Asked if Campbell means those Republicans are supporting  legislation that 'reeks of socialism,' Campbell spokesman Chris  Changery said, 'He's not saying anything about anybody else who  voted for it.'

Opponents call CARA 'green pork,' and property rights groups  call it a federal land grab.

As an opponent, Campbell joins with fellow members of the  Appropriations Committee, considered by supporters to be the major  obstacle to passing the bill. U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., is  undecided on the bill but does not sit on the committee.

Campbell had been officially undecided on the bill until  Thursday's vote in committee, when an amendment was rejected that  would have given Congress more say over how the money was spent.  After that, he issued a statement saying he would not support it  in its current form.

He complained that the bill would create a new entitlement  program for federal lands and noted that other trust-fund programs  go back to Congress every five years, while CARA would not return  for 15 years.

The bill, Campbell said, would lead to higher costs to manage  federal lands, higher property taxes as more land is taken off tax  rolls, and more dependence on foreign oil because drilling would  be restricted on the new federal land.

Supporters of the bill say that Congress - and specifically  congressional appropriators - has for years failed to use the oil  drilling money for recreation, which is where it was originally  supposed to go.

GRAPHIC: PHOTO: Campbell

LOAD-DATE: July 21, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 137 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.