HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 126 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Denver Post Corporation  
The Denver Post

July 26, 2000 Wednesday 2D EDITION

SECTION: A SECTION; Pg. A-04

LENGTH: 606 words

HEADLINE: Senate panel OKs parkland bill Campbell, other foes, set for floor fight

BYLINE: By Mike Soraghan, Denver Post Washington Bureau,

BODY:
WASHINGTON - Republican senators from the Rocky Mountain  West, including Colorado's Ben Nighthorse Campbell, were  unsuccessful Tuesday in blocking legislation that would put nearly  $ 45 billion over the next 15 years into buying parkland around the  country.

Enough other Republicans joined with Democrats to win  committee approval for the Conservation and Reinvestment Act,  brushing aside concerns that the bill is just 'green pork.' As the  committee vote finished, one opposing lobbyist shouted 'oink!  oink!' as senators left the room.

The bill is supported by environmental groups and sporting  goods makers, who say Congress has long diverted the money that is  supposed to go into buying land for parks, hiking trails and  soccer fields. It is opposed by property rights advocates, who say  the bill encourages governments to take land.

The 13-7 vote moved the legislation past a key hurdle, but  supporters are bracing for a fight on the Senate floor. With fewer  than 20 working days left in this Congress, it may be a fight even  to get it to the floor.

The bill takes nearly $ 3 million a year from offshore  drilling revenues and puts it into buying land. Some of the money  would go toward buying environmentally sensitive land, some to the  states for parks and recreation, and some to cities and counties  with federally owned land, to help make up for the land not being  subject to property taxes.

Supporters say Colorado would get more than $ 57 million a  year from the Senate version of the bill. Of that, about $ 24  million would go to local governments for 'payment in lieu of  taxes,' or PILT. Last year, Colorado got $ 9 million in PILT.

Campbell sits on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee  that moved the bill Tuesday. He actually missed the vote, allowing  a fellow opponent to cast his 'no' vote by proxy as he attended a  hearing on airline problems.

But he had already rejected the bill as 'socialism,' saying  that it takes too much control over federal dollars out of the  hands of elected legislators and into the hands of bureaucrats.  Environmentalists and sporting goods makers have criticized him,  saying he's ignoring Coloradans' support for open space.

Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Loveland, remains undecided. A number of  other Colorado Republicans support the bill, including Gov. Bill  Owens. U.S. Rep. Bob Schaffer, R-Fort Collins, voted against the  bill in the House, but the rest of the Colorado delegation  supported it.

Campbell was joined in his opposition by Western Republican  Sens. Conrad Burns of Montana, Larry Craig of Idaho, Pete Domenici  of New Mexico and Slade Gorton of Washington. Westerners including  Sens. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., and Gordon Smith, R-Ore., supported it.

But the biggest supporter in the Senate has been Energy  Chairman Frank Murkowski, R-Alaska, who shepherded the bill  through committee. Opponents say the bill has been loaded with  goodies for Alaska in order to maintain Murkowski's support.  During Tuesday's meeting, the American Land Rights Association, a  property rights group that opposes the act, distributed a flier  reading 'Alaska's snout in the trough.'

Murkowski said the fight was not so much over Western  distrust of federal land ownership as it was legislative budget  writers holding on to their power.

'Let's be honest with ourselves,' Murkowski told reporters  after the vote. 'We've taken on the appropriators and the  budgeteers. This detracts from their traditional area of  responsibility.'

LOAD-DATE: July 31, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 126 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.