HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 321 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 1999 Journal of Commerce, Inc.  
Journal of Commerce

June 18, 1999, Friday

SECTION: EDITORIAL/OPINION; Pg. 9

LENGTH: 717 words

HEADLINE: A SHIP'S "SQUAT' INVOLVES DRAFTS, NOT TOTAL WEIGHT

BODY:
The statement in your editorial of May 24 (""A matter of definition,'' Page 4A) that everyone makes mistakes is, unfortunately, true, and that goes both for me and your distinguished paper - including the individuals you quote.

On Page 2B of the May 25 issue (""Ocean ships slow as Seaway sinks''), St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corp. official Pat Vincelli is quoted as saying that a ship's squat is the amount a ship sinks in the water.

This is not true. Rather, it is the increased draft by the stern, compensated for by a decrease of the draft forward.

In other words, the ship's total weight does not change, and the weight of the water displaced remains the same.

SVEN R. MOSSBERG

Maritime Consultant

Lakehurst, N.J.

CONSERVATION FUNDING BILL MERITS PRAISE

The criticism of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act (CARA) in ""Clean oceans and hockey rinks'' (opinion article, May 26, Page 4A) misses the forest for the trees.

CARA is one of several conservation funding measures before Congress that offer real advancements in America's ability to protect wildlife, wild places and critical natural resources.

These advancements can be found in four critical common-ground elements shared by each of the bipartisan proposals, including the administration's Lands Legacy Initiative:

They all call for a permanent source of conservation funding, based on revenue from offshore oil and gas drilling leases, not subject to annual appropriations battles.

They all call for wildlife management investments at the state level that, among other things, could help stop wildlife populations from declining to the point that they require federal protection under the Endangered Species Act.

They all call for full funding of the Land and Water Conservation Fund at $900 million annually to be divided between state and federal programs.

They all call for environmental restoration investments for all the national's coastal states.

Together, these changes would benefit all Americans, including private land- owners who - despite the never-ending scare tactics of those who oppose every piece of environmental legislation - have nothing to fear from plans to acquire land from willing sellers for conservation purposes.

The bigger picture is that the country now has an unprecedented opportunity to enact historic conservation funding legislation.

As your opinion article noted, that legislation will provide investments for urban parks as well as remote wild lands. But for many Americans, that combination is part of this legislation's strength, not a weakness.

Of course CARA is not perfect. It is in need of some refinements to better achieve the conservation America so badly needs. But the legislation offers an important starting point. For that, it deserves praise, not scorn.

MARK VAN PUTTEN

President, chief executive

National Wildlife Federation Vienna, Va.

EGYPT ADOPTED RULE TO PROTECT ITS CONSUMERS

Michael Barron's ""Egypt Puts Its Progress at Risk'' (opinion article, May 10, Page 5A) generally does justice to economic reform efforts in Egypt. Mr. Barron correctly notes that the reforms have already elevated Egypt to "" emerging-market status,'' and are attracting foreign investments in the country.

Where I disagree with Mr. Barron is when he asserts that the Ministry of Trade and Supplies' decision No. 619 is threatening to undo the gains of recent years because the decision imposes a few controls on some selective imports.

It is not so much the analysis that is wrong, but the premises on which it is based.

Actually, decision 619 was adopted to protect Egyptian consumers who have been flooded by low-quality goods which are impacting the better-quality locally produced ones.

In making this decision, the MTS was keen that it should not impinge on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or World Trade Organization provisions.

The decision, furthermore, only covers 7 percent of Egypt's total imports. However, in implementing the decision, the MTS is taking into consideration both the concerns of the importers and the flexibility needed to overcome any problems that may arise.

ABDELALEEM EL-ABYAD

Minister, Head of Office Embassy of the Arab Republic of Egypt Press & Information Bureau

Washington

LOAD-DATE: June 18, 1999




[Previous Document] Document 321 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.