Back to National Journal
2 of 8 results     Previous Story | Next Story | Back to Results List

09-23-2000

APPROPRIATIONS: Wildfires Burn Conferees On Interior Spending Bill

House and Senate conferees this week picked up their shovels and loaded
the fiscal 2001 Interior appropriations bill with lots of election-year
largesse, but some provisions included in the conference report could draw
the ire of the White House and prompt a veto.

At press time, conferees were still discussing funds for the President's cherished Lands Legacy Initiative. But they agreed to compensate private-property owners for losses stemming from this summer's record number of wildfires, and accepted a proposal by Sen. Pete V. Domenici, R-N.M., to spend $240 million to help at-risk communities curtail the possibility of future wildfires.

Conferees began negotiations on Sept. 20. "This bill has come a long way since it passed the House," said Rep. Norman Dicks, D-Wash., the ranking member of the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee.

Sen. Slade Gorton, R-Wash., the chairman of the Senate Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, said conferees tentatively agreed on a fiscal 2001 budget of about $18 billion, a $3 billion increase over fiscal 2000. But more than half of that increase is for emergency spending to help the federal government deal with this summer's Western wildfires, some of which are still burning.

The conference report would appropriate nearly $1.8 billion for the effort, which includes the $1.6 billion requested by the Administration. Most of the money would go to replenish accounts used to fund firefighting activities. The rest would go to environmental restoration and to help rebuild federal facilities destroyed by the fires.

While both political parties accepted that firefighting proposal, they were more uneasy about accepting some lawmakers' requests for additional funds for their home states. Sens. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and Conrad Burns, R-Mont., proposed spending an additional $320 million in emergency money to help fire-ravaged areas in their states, but several Senators said appropriating that much money, in addition to the $1.8 billion already in the legislation, would be excessive.

Conferees agreed to appropriate $130 million for state and private-property compensation in all states hurt by the fires-with a supplemental spending bill picking up the rest of the tab next year.

In a related matter, conferees accepted a proposal by Domenici to appropriate $240 million, split evenly between the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, to help certain areas located near forests to clear out underbrush and other hazardous materials as part of an effort to prevent future wildfires in those areas.

On the Lands Legacy Initiative, conferees boosted funds for the program into the $400 million range, a significant increase over both the House- and Senate-passed Interior bills. But Democratic aides said that is still about $550 million short of the President's request. Gorton said he is willing to negotiate a higher funding level for the program, but he was unwilling to make its land preservation initiative permanent, as the White House would like to do.

Meanwhile, Rep. George Nethercutt, R-Wash., narrowed his proposal blocking the Administration from proceeding with the Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Conferees accepted provisions that would force the Interior Department to study the effect the plan would have on small communities before moving forward. Democrats said the proposal was an improvement, but warned the Administration still opposed it.

The White House will also probably oppose the inclusion of another provision, included at the behest of Gorton, to enact a one-year moratorium preventing the Administration from tearing down dams-or even studying the possibility-on the lower Snake River to help save endangered salmon. Democrats complained that the White House has never endorsed such a proposal and that the issue was brought up for "political means."

On another key issue in the Interior spending bill, the National Endowment for the Arts, negotiators sought a compromise between the agency's critics and supporters. The House agreed to provide funds for the agency at the Senate-approved level-$105 million, or $7 million more than the House originally appropriated. But to satisfy House conservatives who have opposed the NEA, that $7 million increase would be put into a new account, the Challenge America Arts Fund, for public outreach and education activities.

Rep. Ralph Regula, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, called the account a "good solution" to his dilemma, but the overall total for the NEA is still about $50 million short of the Administration's request. Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wis., the ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee, said the White House would insist on an increase before signing the bill.

Bill Ghent National Journal
Need A Reprint Of This Article?
National Journal Group offers both print and electronic reprint services, as well as permissions for academic use, photocopying and republication. Click here to order, or call us at 202-266-7230.

2 of 8 results     Previous Story | Next Story | Back to Results List