HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 55 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 Star Tribune  
Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN)

September 26, 2000, Tuesday, Metro Edition

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 11A

LENGTH: 455 words

HEADLINE: Conservation bill backers say time is running out

BYLINE: Andrew Donohue; Staff Writer

DATELINE: Washington, D.C.

BODY:
As Congress heads for adjournment next month, supporters of a bill that would bring $37 million a year to Minnesota for parks programs, wildlife protection and land conservation fear that time is running out to get the legislation passed.

   "Now is the time to do this," said Ron Payer, fisheries director of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, one of three department officials who came to Washington last week to lobby for the bill.

   Supporters say it's the most important piece of environmental legislation pending before Congress. But some Western legislators and private property groups warn of a federal land-grab, and budget hawks are wary of its hefty $3 billion annual price tag.

   The Conservation and Reinvestment Act is struggling to get to the Senate floor as spending bills grab most of the attention in the final weeks of the 106th Congress.

   The legislation, which the House passed 315 to 102 in May, would renew and expand a 1964 congressional commitment that used federal revenue from offshore oil leases to buy land for national and state parks and other environmental programs. Supporters had said it would give $900 million a year to the Land and Water Conservation Fund, but funding has dwindled to $2 million this year.

   To boost funding, the legislation would allocate $45 billion of the oil lease revenues over the next 15 years to a spectrum of environmental and conservation causes, from wetlands protection to urban educational programs.

   Sen. Rod Grams, R-Minn., said he supports the bill's goals, but he wants to make sure hunting and fishing rights aren't infringed upon. He said he's also concerned about land-purchasing issues.    And he said that there currently is no oversight in the bill on how the money will be spent _ something that needs to be worked out before he can support it.

   Among the bill's supporters are President Clinton, who last week led a push for its passage in the Senate, and the governors of all 50 states. A letter signed by 63 senators, including Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., also has been sent to Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and Minority Leader Thomas Daschle, D-S.D., urging them to bring the bill to the floor.

   But there's a glaring omission on the list of supporters: the Sierra Club. Dana Wolfe, a Sierra Club land-protection representative, said supporters have the right idea, but the group opposes the measure because it provides incentives for states such as Alaska to allow more offshore drilling and it contains language that would allow funding of projects that could hurt the environment.

.

Andrew Donohue can be contacted at intern@mcclatchydc.com



LOAD-DATE: September 27, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 55 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.