HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 205 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Times-Picayune Publishing Co.  
The Times-Picayune

May 19, 2000 Friday, ORLEANS

SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. A11

LENGTH: 487 words

HEADLINE: CONSERVATION BILL STILL FACES UPHILL FIGHT;
ACT WOULD GIVE STATE $300 MILLION A YEAR

BYLINE: By Bruce Alpert Washington bureau

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott pledged Thursday to push forward with legislation that would dramatically increase conservation financing in Louisiana and other states, but warned it still faces major obstacles.

At a news conference called by the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., Lott mentioned two potential problems: Western senators opposed to any increase in the federal government's land holdings, and those who "feel like it's too much money."

"There are going to be things that have to be worked out, but that is the legislative process," said Lott, R-Miss. "This is a worthwhile effort."

The $2.8 billion Conservation and Reinvestment Act would use royalty revenue from offshore oil and gas drilling to pay for conservation, wildlife, recreation and historic preservation programs, including land acquisition. The measure would provide Louisiana with more than $300 million a year.

Landrieu said last week's 315-102 passage of a companion bill in the House gives the policy significant momentum. Proponents are close to the 60 votes needed to kill a threatened filibuster, she said.

But getting the measure signed into law won't be easy, despite the recent endorsement of President Clinton. Not only are property-rights supporters promising an all-out fight to kill the bill, but some senators have suggested that they want to rewrite financing formulas so their states would get more money.

Even Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who appeared at the news conference as one of the bill's co-sponsors, has said he would like to see a reallocation of the financing to increase Alabama's share above the projected $51 million a year.

Landrieu said the fact that the bill has such broad bipartisan support is encouraging, however.

"Let me just answer one question that has been asked since the beginning," she said. "The question is: Can we afford to do this? I would respond, can we afford not to do it? Since 1930, Louisiana has lost more than 1,500 square miles of marsh. The state loses between 25 and 30 miles each year, nearly a football field of wetlands every day."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., had her own proposal to reallocate offshore oil and gas revenue for conservation programs, but said she decided to sign on to the Landrieu bill because it's the only one that can pass.

"If you want a bill, this is the bill, I believe," Feinstein said. She added that for more than 30 years the federal government hasn't fulfilled its commitment to provide money for key conservation programs to protect wetlands, estuaries and endangered species.

"These monies have been hijacked for decades to balance the budget," Feinstein said. "If we don't take a time of surplus, two years in a row and 10 years of projected surpluses, and say right now we're going to straighten out that situation, we're going to do the right thing by the money, I don't think it's ever going to get done."

GRAPHIC: Trent Lott 'This is a worthwhile effort'

LOAD-DATE: May 20, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 205 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.