HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 127 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Times-Picayune Publishing Co.  
The Times-Picayune

July 26, 2000 Wednesday, ORLEANS

SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. A04

LENGTH: 962 words

HEADLINE: COMMITTEE PASSES LANDRIEU'S BILL ON OFFSHORE ROYALTIES

BYLINE: By Bruce Alpert Washington bureau

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
Overcoming stalling tactics and "poison pill" amendments from opponents, legislation to create a $3 billion annual fund for conservation and environmental programs won a key victory Tuesday, passing the Senate Energy Committee on a 13-7 vote.

"This was our highest hurdle and we have cleared it this morning," said a jubilant Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., the bill's sponsor.

The legislation would direct offshore oil and gas royalties for 15 years to pay for an array of conservation programs from restoring wetlands to creating urban and rural parks. The money would come from drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and off Alaska and would generate $170 million a year for Louisiana.

The Energy Committee included a solid core of opponents, especially Republicans from Western states who fear the money will be used by the government to appropriate private property. The U.S. government already owns or controls huge tracts of land in the West.

--- Panel was a tough sell ---

Landrieu and other supporters have long maintained that passage of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act by the full Senate would be easier than getting it past the committee.

The bill's prospects may be decided by the calendar and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., a co-sponsor, who met briefly with Senate Energy Committee Chairman Frank Murkowski, R-Alaska, after Tuesday's committee vote.

"I saw Chairman Murkowski just a moment ago, and he shook my hand and then said, 'OK, now it's in your lap, big boy,' " Lott said.

The majority leader said "our biggest problem" is the large agenda, with relatively few legislative days left.

But he added: "There's a lot of support, a lot of momentum behind this. And while it has some opposition that I'm sympathetic to, from the Western senators, we'll try to find a way to schedule it in September. I hope we can."

After more than 11 hours of debate over five days, the Energy Committee vote came with about 15 minutes left in a session limited to 2 1/2 hours by parliamentary rules invoked by opponents.

The final tally included "yes" votes by four Republicans and all nine Democrats on the panel. When the vote was announced, supporters of the legislation, including representatives of Louisiana conservation and environmental organizations, applauded and exchanged high fives.

Landrieu hugged several of her staffers, and grasped hands with Murkowski.

--- Compromise forged ---

It was Murkowski, who has long tangled with environmentalists, who negotiated a compromise with Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., to require congressional approval for federal acquisition of private land. Murkowski and Bingaman then helped defeat amendments that would have drastically changed the impact of the bill.

"This is the most significant commitment of resources ever made to conservation by the Congress," Murkowski said.

Landrieu, noting that more than 80 percent of the revenue comes from leases off the coast of Louisiana, said she will try in negotiations to get the final allocations closer to the House version of the bill, which would generate $300 million a year for Louisiana. The House passed its version last year by a vote of 315-109.

Opponents promised to continue to fight, vowing filibusters and other procedural moves, including possibly trying to transfer the bill to another committee.

"This is a $45 billion pile of pork," said Mike Hariman, a lobbyist for the American Land Rights Association, alleging that the bill would increase already huge federal land stockpiles. "We're going to fight this to the last ditch."

But supporters say they have the 60 votes to cut off any filibuster attempts.

Sen. John Breaux, D-La., said obstacles remain, noting that opponents include key members of the Senate Republican leadership, as well as leaders of the powerful appropriations and budget committees. Even if the bill passes the Senate, negotiators will have to resolve some of the significant differences between the Senate and House versions.

Still, Breaux said the significance of Tuesday's Energy Committee vote shouldn't be diminished.

"This has been one of the greatest examples of legislative enactment in decades," said Breaux, adding that Murkowski and Bingaman, along with Landrieu, were able to craft a compromise that amounted to bringing together people with "diametrically opposite positions."

--- Bill has support ---

There are several factors in the bill's favor in these last five or six weeks before Congress is expected to adjourn Oct. 6. The measure, with its wide array of local and regional projects, enjoys support from such diverse groups as the Trust for Public Land, the National Governors Association and Chamber of Commerce.

It also is supported by both the Clinton-Gore administration and Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee.

Opponents said the bill would hurt the rights of land owners and that it is unfair to commit future Congresses to spend money on the programs outlined in the bill, giving them a higher priority than education, health care and public safety.

But Landrieu said state and local officials need a long-term commitment that federal conservation financing won't suddenly disappear if they're to commit their own resources to solve long-term environmental problems, such as the continuing loss of wetlands in Louisiana.

"With the committee's approval today of CARA, we are near our goal of creating permanent federal conservation funding that governors, mayors, local governments and all Americans can depend on," Landrieu said. "Our parks, coastlines, wetlands, wildlife and historic treasures are too important to do otherwise. We need a commitment to the American people and the environment that will stand up year after year."

LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 127 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.