HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 124 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Times-Picayune Publishing Co.  
The Times-Picayune

July 28, 2000 Friday, ORLEANS

SECTION: METRO; Pg. B06

LENGTH: 478 words

HEADLINE: RESTORE MONEY FOR OUR COAST

BODY:
A bill that would help restore Louisiana's eroding coastline with offshore oil revenue has cleared its most daunting hurdle, the Senate Energy Committee.

That's an encouraging victory for our state, which has paid a heavy environmental price for decades of oil and gas exploration. A steady source of money for coastal restoration projects is a critical need for a state that is rapidly losing land to the Gulf of Mexico.

Sen. Mary Landrieu and other supporters of the Conservation and Reinvestment Act have done an admirable job in bringing the landmark bill to this point. They have overcome stiff opposition, especially from Western Republicans who are afraid that the legislation will fuel more federal land acquisition and who tried their best to kill the bill in committee.

But even though the legislation is expected to have an easier time passing the full Senate, the Louisiana delegation has its work cut out. It's up to them and their allies in other states with a significant offshore oil activity to restore a greater share of the money to the states that are most profoundly affected by that industry.

The House version of the bill, adopted last year, provided a larger share of the $3 billion a year in offshore oil royalties to Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and California.

Compromises on the Senate side, aimed at getting support from inland states, spread more of the wealth around. Under the Senate version, Louisiana would receive $170 million a year for the next 15 years instead of the $300 million a year the House envisioned.

But giving Louisiana and states like it a bigger cut is the right thing to do.

It's not as though the bill provides nothing for environmental and conservation needs elsewhere. Specifically, it would finance the Land and Water Conservation Fund and provide money for wildlife preservation, parks and historic preservation.

Sen. Landrieu points out that 80 percent of the offshore revenue comes from leases off Louisiana's coast. Our state and others with heavy offshore activity have borne the costs of production, providing roads and other basic systems needed to support the industry.

Louisiana also has a large share of our nation's coastal wetlands -- 24 percent -- and 40 percent of the country's salt marshes. Oil and gas drilling are among the factors that have caused the loss of these crucial areas.

Coastal wetlands are a national resource, and they deserve protection. People from other states should be able to understand this, too, as the matter is debated on the Senate floor and in a House-Senate conference committee.

Erosion isn't an imaginary threat. Without significant intervention, South Louisiana faces the loss of land where we work, play and live.

This isn't a question of who gets a larger slice of pork. It's a question of whose state is washing away.

LOAD-DATE: July 28, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 124 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.