HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 279 of 338. [Next Document]

Copyright 1999 The Times-Picayune Publishing Co.  
The Times-Picayune

November 21, 1999 Sunday, ORLEANS

SECTION: SPORTS; Pg. C16

LENGTH: 678 words

HEADLINE: HOUSE COMMITTEE GETS CREDIT FOR CONSERVATION BILL

BYLINE: By BOB MARSHALL, Outdoors editor

BODY:
Behavior modification is a powerful and important tool in all areas of life. When a bad dog behaves, you should always remember to toss it a bone. When a bully reforms, you make him a friend. And when a politician does the right thing, you stand up and cheer.

So it's time for anyone who cares about fish and wildlife to give a few hoorays to the House Resources Committee. Last week the panel made one of the best votes of the century for natural resources by passing CARA -- the Conservation and Reinvestment Act (H.R. 701) -- 37-12.

Calling this landmark legislation might be understatement; it's that good. This one sweeping bill would undo years of national neglect for fish, wildlife, wetlands and parks. Using funds generated by fees on offshore oil and gas activities, CARA would put some $44 billion over the next 15 years into a pot to be distributed to state and federal agencies.

Key uses:

* Provide $1 billion to coastal states for mitigation of impact from oil and gas exploration. Louisiana would receive nearly $285 million per year, vital funding for its battle against coastal erosion.

* Provide state agencies with significant funding for non-consumptive programs. Hunters and fishers no longer would be footing the entire bill for these programs, which are dreadfully underfunded. Louisiana would receive about $5.8 million a year.

* Put $900 million into the long-ignored Land and Water Conservation Fund, used to purchase critical fish and wildlife habitat, such as national wildlife refuges.

* Provide almost $425 million for urban parks, historic preservation sites, federal land restoration projects.

* Make $150 million available for wildlife easement on private lands and species recovery programs.

CARA grew out of a proposal first made almost 15 years ago to provide badly needed funding for state agencies and outdoors recreation programs on federal lands. The funding source proposed back then was an excise tax on outdoors gear such as boots, backpacks, tents and the like. Hunters and fishers had been paying the fish, wildlife and lands bills for 40 years with a similar tax on hunting and fishing gear.

But outdoors gear manufacturers repeatedly balked. Backpackers and bird-watchers didn't have the same sense of commitment as hunters and fishers, it turned out. And Congress didn't like the idea of passing a tax.

When the anti-tax, anti-fee Republicans gained control of Congress, the idea looked dead. But if anything can pull politicians together, it's money. When the idea was broached of using offshore mineral funds for a nationwide program that could put dollars in the pots of every state, support began to mount. It didn't hurt that the chairman of the key committee, Don Young, happened to be from Alaska -- a state that figured to gain big-time.

Louisiana's delegation came through as well, especially Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-Hackbay) and Chris John (R-Baton Rouge). Normally a fierce opponent of anything that allows federal purchase of lands -- even from willing sellers -- Tauzin was able to put his ideology aside to bring badly needed millions to his state. He and John had to convince others to do the same.

"They faced a lot of opposition from western Republicans on the private property agenda, but they exerted a lot of leadership for their state," said Naomi Edelson, of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, a major lobby for CARA. "There were some significant compromises made, and this became truly a bi-partisan bill.

"I think it's important for people to recognize what their representatives have done on this issue. We want to keep them with us."

That might seem like backward thinking to some. Why reward someone for doing the right thing? Especially people who are listed as public servants?

But public resources ultimately are governed by politicians, and CARA has a long way to go -- the House floor, the entire Senate. If the politicians hear us cheering loudly enough, maybe they'll continue to do the right things.

It's worth the effort.

COLUMN: BOB MARSHALL

LOAD-DATE: November 21, 1999




[Previous Document] Document 279 of 338. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: conservation and reinvestment act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.