Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: PNTR, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 364 of 389. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 2000 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

February 16, 2000, Wednesday

SECTION: PREPARED TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 3289 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF JOHN CHEN CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT SYBASE, INCORPORATED ON BEHALF OF THE BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE
 
BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS
 
SUBJECT - U.S.-BILATERAL TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE ACCESSION OF CHINA TO THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

BODY:
 Mr. Chairman, and members of the Committee:

Thank you for the opportunity to present the views of Sybase and the Business Software Alliance on the recently concluded bilateral trade agreement with the Peoples' Republic of China, and the prospect of China's accession to the World Trade Organization. The U.S.-China bilateral WTO accession agreement reached on November 15, 1999 is a solid win for the U.S. high-technology industry.

Specifically, the Chinese market offers bright prospects to the U.S. software industry. If we are able to realize these prospects, the gains for U.S. workers, U.S. competitiveness, and the U.S. balance of trade will be overwhelmingly positive. In the view of my company, as well the American software industry, bringing China into the World Trade Organization as soon as possible is the best way to reap that harvest. Introduction

My name is John Chen. I am Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Sybase, Inc., one of the largest independent software companies in the world. Our company's mission is to help businesses manage and deliver applications, content and data anywhere they are needed. Sybase was founded in 1984, is headquartered in Emeryville, California, and has over 4,200 employees worldwide. Our software products are sold all over the world, including in China, where we maintain six offices and are among the leading foreign firms in terms of software sales. Markets in China that Sybase has successfully entered include banking and finance, telecommunications, security, government, transportation, healthcare and the public sector of energy, TV stations and retail. As another example of Sybase's commitment to building our business in China, we have just opened the Asian Solutions Center in January of this year in Hong Kong. Jointly sponsored by Sybase and Hong Kong Productivity Council, the Asian Solutions Center enables local and regional application vendors, systems integrators, and industry service specialists to take advantage of the center's marketing, technical, business alliance and consulting resources to develop leading-edge IT solutions for both local and regional businesses.

Sybase is also a member of the Policy Council of the Business Software Alliance, on whose behalf I am testifying today. BSA is the voice of the world's leading software developers before governments and with consumers in the international marketplace. Its members represent the fastest growing industry in the world. BSA educates computer users on software copyrights; advocates public policy that fosters innovation and expands trade opportunities; and fights software piracy. BSA members include Adobe, Apple Computer, Autodesk, Bentley Systems, Compaq, Corel Corporation, IBM, Intel, Intuit, Lotus Development, Macromedia, Microsoft, Network Associates, Novell, Sybase, Symantec and Walker Digital. BSA Websites: www.bsa.org; www.nopiracy.com.

I would also like to note that BSA is a member of the High-Tech Industry Coalition on China. The coalition is comprised of 11 trade associations representing U.S. manufacturers of semiconductors and semiconductor equipment and materials, computers, electronics, software and telecommunications equipment, as well as U.S. Internet companies. A list of coalition members is attached and the coalition has submitted a written statement for your review. The Coalition wholeheartedly encourages the Congress to quickly move to grant PNTR for China.

In the U.S., the software industry is growing three times as fast, and producing new jobs at a rate more than five times as fast, as the economy as a whole. One of the key ingredients in this great success story has been sales outside the U.S. - in a word, exports. The U.S. software industry as a whole brings in 60 percent of its revenue from sales outside the U.S. According to a recent study commissioned by BSA, the U.S. software industry is expected to generate a trade surplus of more than $20 billion this year. That includes a hefty trade surplus with China, a country with whom most other sectors of the economy are running a big trade deficit. Increasing trade with China - and especially, increasing U.S. exports to China - is a crucial goal for Sybase, for BSA companies generally, and for the U.S. economy as a whole. That is why we in the software industry are so enthusiastic about the prospect of China joining the World Trade Organization. We also strongly support the recently negotiated bilateral trade agreement with the PRC, which is an essential factor in making China's WTO accession possible. Bringing China into the WTO offers us the best policy tools available for opening up the Chinese market, particularly by reducing the widespread copyright piracy that acts as an enormous market access barrier for our industry. For this reason, we urge Congress to act as promptly as possible to grant China permanent normal trade relations (PNTR), which is a prerequisite to making WTO membership a reality.

China: The Opportunity

The Chinese market presents an unsurpassed opportunity for Sybase and the entire U.S. software industry. According to the most recent estimates I have seen, about $ 1 billion worth of software was sold in China in 1998. That market is growing at a phenomenal annual rate of 30 percent, according to the U.S. Foreign and Commercial Service. If anything, that estimate may be too conservative. When you reflect on the fact that the number of Internet users in China quadrupled during 1999 alone - and is expected to more than double again by the end of this year - you can understand why the Chinese demand for computer software of all kinds is growing by leaps and bounds. And, Sybase has found that there is an emerging generation of Chinese that are ready to embrace Sybase's powerful Enterprise Portal solutions that help them deliver on the promise of e-Business.

No country is better situated to meet that demand than the United States. American software products are preeminent in every market in every country around the world - including in China -- where U.S. firms account for an estimated 80 percent of all software sold by foreign companies. Our software industry is an unrivalled generator of U.S. jobs - nearly a million of them -- and good jobs, too, paying on average more than double the average salary for non-software jobs in the private sector. The more U.S. software is sold in China, the more good jobs are created here at home. So opening the Chinese market as much as possible to U.S. software exports is both good business for the software industry, and good public policy for the United States. For us, that is what PNTR and Chinese accession to the WTO are all about. Leading software companies like Sybase can only benefit, creating new high quality U.S. jobs, from China's entering the WTO.

Of course, I am not saying that bringing China into the WTO will be a panacea, or that it automatically guarantees that U.S. companies will thrive in the Chinese market. There are a number of significant obstacles that must be overcome. But establishing permanent normal trade relations with China and bringing China into the WTO are the best ways to help us deal with those obstacles.



The chief barriers to the Chinese market for U.S. software companies fall into two main categories: Market access and copyright piracy. If China is brought into the WTO on the terms contained in the new bilateral trade deal, we will be in a much better position to attack barriers in both categories.

Market Access Barriers

In the first category are the traditional market access barriers generally addressed through WTO agreements. Tariffs are a prime example. Today, the duties, taxes and other fees for importing software into China run about 30 to 40 percent. Tariffs are high on other information technology products as well. These tariffs make our products less competitive to Chinese buyers. As part of the WTO accession package, China is agreeing to sign on to the Information Technology Agreement (ITA), which requires all signatories to zero out their tariffs on computer software and a host of other information technology products. Clearly, that will enhance our prospects in the Chinese market.

China also maintains a number of non-tariff trade barriers, ranging from import quotas to restrictions on the right of foreign companies to establish businesses in China or to undertake wholesale and retail distribution of products there. In the bilateral agreement recently negotiated with China, many of these barriers would be phased out. For instance, U.S. software companies would be allowed to directly distribute their products anywhere in China within two years (on the wholesale level), and within three years (at retail). It is notable that the Chinese have even agreed to allow some foreign investment in the telecommunications infrastructure, and in content services to be provided over these networks and via the Internet. These opportunities would have been unthinkable for China just a few years ago; they are of particular interest to many U.S. software companies, and will become available to Americans only once China joins the WTO.

Finally, as a WTO member, China will be subject to a number of general obligations that will facilitate the market prospects of U.S. software companies. These commitments include national treatment obligations, so that U.S. companies cannot be treated less favorably than domestic Chinese competitors, and transparency, so that the rules of trade are publicly available and known to all. Clearly the U.S. software industry will benefit from a more level playing field in China.

The Major Barrier: Piracy

The second major type of market access barrier our companies have faced in China is the lack of effective intellectual property protection. Copyright piracy - the unauthorized copying, distribution or sale of our copyrighted computer programs -- is an extremely serious problem for the software industry in China. BSA estimates the piracy level for packaged software applications at 95 percent for 1998. That means that for every legitimate, licensed copy of such an application in use in China, there are about 19 pirate copies.

Some of those pirate copies are counterfeit CD-ROM's sold in a shopping arcade or on a street corner. Many others are illegal, unlicensed copies, which are made within a business enterprise, government agency, or other institution. A company may buy one legitimate copy of the program and then, in violation of its licensing agreement, make it available for use on ten, twenty, or a hundred PC's, whether on a network or by making unauthorized physical copies. In all, BSA conservatively estimates that software piracy in China cost the U.S. business software sector more than $800 million in revenue in 1998.

Piracy of U.S. software, in whatever form it takes, eats into the market that U.S. software companies would otherwise serve. BSA companies spend millions to research, develop, test, market, distribute, support and service the best computer programs in the world. Our licensing fees must allow us to recover those costs and make a profit, in part to fund ongoing research, development and testing. The pirate, whether on a street corner or in an office suite, has none of those costs - he just takes the product, and makes the copies available free or for a small fraction of the legitimate price.

Competing with piracy is economically impossible. It's very difficult to persuade a customer to buy a product when he can readily take it for free without legal consequences. So when piracy dominates a market as it does in China, it constitutes an obstacle to market entry far more formidable than any tariff, import quota, or other more traditional market access barrier.

Impact of WTO Accession

How will China's entry into the WTO help in the fight against software piracy? The strongest multilateral trade tool we have for promoting good copyright protection in foreign markets is the WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - the TRIPS Agreement. This pact obligates WTO member countries to enact strong copyright laws, to put effective enforcement provisions on the books and to actually apply those laws in practice. Indeed, to fulfill their TRIPS obligations, countries must criminally prosecute those who are committing copyright piracy on a commercial scale, including unauthorized use in the corporate environment, and must impose punishments on pirates that are sufficient to create deterrence.

As part of the WTO accession package, China has promised to come into compliance with the TRIPS Agreement immediately, without any delay or transition period. That commitment gives us a powerful tool in combating software piracy in China.

The TRIPS Agreement not only sets standards for intellectual property protection and enforcement; it also provides -- for the first time -- a strong multilateral mechanism for ensuring that countries meet these standards. That mechanism is the WTO dispute settlement process. Once China joins the WTO, if it is not complying with the requirements of the TRIPS Agreement, the U.S. (as well as its trading partners) can invoke the dispute settlement process to strongly encourage China into compliance.

WTO dispute settlement has already succeeded in bringing countries into compliance with their TRIPS obligations relating to copyright enforcement and has worked effectively for U.S. copyright owners. BSA is confident that it will work in China, too. But only if China joins the WTO can this effective tool be used to deter the huge software piracy problem we face there. Congress can help companies employ this tool by approving PNTR for China.

Piracy: Recent Developments and Future Prospects

The software piracy picture in China is naturally a concern. The numbers that have already been cited, for piracy levels and for the resulting losses to U.S. software companies, speak for themselves. Nevertheless, I believe there is some basis for optimism about the future. Although China's problem of copyright piracy is long-standing - this issue brought the U.S. and China to the brink of a trade war twice in the mid-1990's - we have made some progress in a few areas. Let me cite three of them.

First, five years ago China was not only a major producer of pirated software, but also a major exporter. Compilations of illegal copies of business applications, made in China, were polluting the markets in Hong Kong, in Southeast Asia, even in Russia and Eastern Europe. That is no longer the case. Pirate exports from China are minimal in volume. While the Chinese market itself remains overrun with pirate product, at least there has been progress in some of the neighboring markets, which Chinese pirates used to supply.

Second, following the lead of the United States government, the PRC has finally begun to tackle the enormous problem of software piracy within the agencies and instrumentalities of the Chinese government itself. Soon after President Clinton issued an Executive Order on software asset management in the federal government, China's State Council promulgated a decree requiring all government agencies to use only legal, licensed software. The follow-up on this decree has been uneven, and much more remains to be done, but we are very gratified that the Chinese government is addressing this problem.

For BSA member companies as a whole, and especially for enterprise software companies like Sybase, the economic impact of corporate end- user piracy is much greater than the damage inflicted by the retail sale of counterfeit software programs. We hope that the government legalization process in China will be accompanied by strong enforcement actions against Chinese corporations that engage in piracy.



Third, although anti-piracy enforcement through administrative and criminal means is of paramount importance, there are indications that the civil courts are becoming more hospitable to infringement cases. Last year, one U.S. software company obtained a civil judgment of over $100,000 - a record -- against Chinese pirates. Another successful civil case, brought by Chinese authors whose material was posted on the Internet without their consent, has garnered widespread publicity in the Chinese press. The world is watching with great interest the way in which Chinese courts address the issue of corporate end user piracy, which more than anything will reflect China's true commitment to the protection of intellectual property rights.

Although software piracy remains a major issue with China, I believe we are starting to see concrete signs of a change in the attitude of the Chinese government to the entire question of protection of intellectual property. A number of factors have contributed to this change. One factor, certainly, has been China's implementation of the 1995 bilateral agreement with the United States on the enforcement of intellectual property rights.

Another factor which cannot be underestimated is the remarkable growth of China's own software industry. The U.S. government estimates that there were 2,000 independent software firms in China in 1998. A Price Waterhouse Coopers study commissioned by BSA predicts that by 2001, the software and supporting industries will account for 100,000 Chinese jobs, will produce almost $600 million in direct tax revenues to the Chinese government, and will stimulate some $6.2 billion in total economic activity in China. These Chinese firms, just like the American software firms doing business in China, depend on strong copyright protection, and are extremely vulnerable to piracy. In fact, according to Price Waterhouse Coopers, reducing piracy levels by just ten percent in 1997 would have added over 13,000 additional Chinese jobs and generated almost $80 million in tax revenues.

Conclusion

It is becoming increasingly clear that the protection of copyright is extremely important to China's economic development. The Chinese increasingly recognize their own strong self-interest in reducing software piracy. The best way to harness that self-interest for the benefit of our own software industry is to bring China into the WTO. As a WTO member, China will be committed to lowering market access barriers, leveling the competitive playing field within its market, and, most importantly, providing strong copyright protection and meaningful mechanisms to enforce that protection.

American software makers and the entire high-tech industry have been at the forefront of U.S. economic expansion and technological leadership. Granting China PNTR, coupled with the significant market reforms in China embodied in its WTO commitments, will enable US high technology companies to expand their market presence and business opportunities in this critical market.

Moreover, access to American commercial information technology enables people worldwide to improve business efficiency across all sectors, enhance educational and social opportunities, and connect with one another. Improved market access for U.S. commercial information technology in China will help to advance economic and social reform in China. A timely congressional vote granting PNTR to China is a critical and necessary step toward securing this goal. Of course, there is a danger that China may not live up to all its WTO commitments. But WTO membership will also subject China to a proven dispute procedure for enforcing those commitments, one that has worked well in the recent past to create strong pressure on countries to deliver on their commitments regarding copyright enforcement.

END



LOAD-DATE: February 17, 2000




Previous Document Document 364 of 389. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: PNTR, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.