Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Permanent, Normal, Trade

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 251 of 334. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

September 17, 2000, Sunday ,THIRD EDITION

SECTION: NATIONAL/FOREIGN; Pg. A34

LENGTH: 1376 words

HEADLINE: NEW ENGLAND VOTES IN CONGRESS

BODY:
WASHINGTON - This is how New England members of Congress were recorded on major roll call votes in the week that ended Friday, Sept. 15.

   HOUSE

MARRIAGE TAXES: Voting 270 for and 158 against, the House on Sept. 13 failed to override President Clinton's veto of a bill (HR 4810) to eliminate the "marriage penalty" that occurs when couples pay more income taxes than if filing as singles. A two-thirds majority was needed to overcome the veto. The bill also would have provided benefits to couples who pay lower taxes, a "marriage bonus," as a result of their union. The cuts were to begin in 2001 at a projected cost of $292 billion over ten years.

Of the 51 million joint returns filed in 1999, nearly half paid a marriage penalty that averaged $1,141 per couple, and about 40 percent received a marriage bonus averaging $1,274 per couple, according to the US Treasury.

Majority Whip Tom DeLay, Republican from Texas, said: "It's time to repeal this destructive, immoral tax on married couples" and rebuff a president who, with his veto, "placed a higher value on retaining Washington spending than he did on extending relief for struggling young families."

Richard A. Gephardt, the minority leader, said: "This bill . . . extends about 60 percent of its benefits to people that earn above the middle class . . . and frankly don't have a marriage penalty . . . The reason the bill was vetoed is that it . . . does things that have nothing to do with the marriage penalty."

CONNECTICUT. Voting yes: Christopher Shays and Nancy Johnson, both Republicans, and James H.Maloney, a Democrat. Voting no: John B. Larson, Sam Gejdenson, Rosa L. DeLauro, Democrats.

MAINE. Voting no: Thomas H. Allen and John E. Baldacci, Democrats.

MASSACHUSETTS. Voting no: John W. Olver, Richard E. Neal, James P. McGovern, Barney Frank, Martin T. Meehan, John F. Tierney, Edward J. Markey, Michael E. Capuano, J. Joseph Moakley, William D. Delahunt, all Democrats.

NEW HAMPSHIRE. Voting yes: John E. Sununu and Charles F. Bass, both Republicans.

RHODE ISLAND. Voting no: Patrick J. Kennedy, Democrat. Not voting: Robert A. Weygand, Democrat.

VERMONT. Voting no: Bernard Sanders, Independent.

HATE CRIMES: On a vote of 232 for and 192 against, the House on Sept. 13 urged enactment of a Senate-passed measure making it a federal offense to commit crimes on the basis of the victim's sexual orientation, gender, or disability. The bill would expand the list of crimes that trigger federal intervention under civil rights statutes. This vote recommended that the House follow the Senate's lead and include in it the 2001 defense budget (H 4205).

Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, said: "Opponents . . . have argued that this is an issue that should be left to the states. However, Congress has passed over 3,000 criminal statutes addressing harmful behaviors that affect the nation's interests, including organized crime, terrorism, and civil rights violations."

Bob Barr, Repubican of Georgia, said the bill "treats crimes against certain classes of persons more severely than those same crimes if they were committed against another class of persons."

A "yes" vote endorsed the hate crimes bill.

CONNECTICUT. Voting yes: Larson, Gejdenson, DeLauro, Shays, Maloney, Johnson.

MAINE. Voting yes: Allen, Baldacci.

MASSACHUSETTS. Voting yes: Olver, Neal, McGovern, Frank, Meehan, Tierney, Markey, Capuano, Moakley, Delahunt.

NEW HAMPSHIRE. Voting yes: Bass.

Voting no: Sununu.

RHODE ISLAND. Voting yes: Kennedy, Weygand.

VERMONT. Voting yes: Sanders.

BOY SCOUTS: By a vote of 12 for and 362 against, the House on Sept. 13 defeated a bill (HR 4892) to revoke the federal charter of the Boy Scouts of America in response to its policy, recently affirmed by the US Supreme Court, of banning gays as scoutmasters.

The issue sparked extraordinary voting behavior on both sides of the aisle. James Greenwood of Pennsylvania, the only Republican to vote for the bill, later issued a statement that he meant to vote against it. And 51 Democrats, mostly liberals, declared "present" - a non-vote - to protest a Republican decision to bring the previously obscure legislation up for a vote on short notice.

The sponsor, Lynn Woolsey, Democrat of California, said her bill sends the message that "Congress does not support discrimination in any form . . . We are not saying that the Boy Scouts are bad. We are saying that intolerance is bad."

Dana Rohrabacher, Republican from California, said: "Instead of attacking the Boy Scouts, we should be celebrating the fact that the Supreme Court has upheld the sanctity of our First Amendment. And we should applaud the scouts."

A "yes" vote was to take away the Boy Scouts' federal charter.

CONNECTICUT. Voting no: Larson, Gejdenson, DeLauro, Shays, Maloney, Johnson.

MAINE. Voting no: Allen, Baldacci.

MASSACHUSETTS. Not voting: Olver, Neal, McGovern, Frank, Meehan, Tierney, Markey, Capuano, Moakley, Delahunt.

NEW HAMPSHIRE. Voting no: Sununu, Bass.

RHODE ISLAND. Voting yes: Kennedy.

nnot voting: Weygand.

VERMONT. Voting no: Sanders.

SENATE

CHINA TRADE: Voting 65 for and 32 against, the Senate on Sept. 13 tabled (killed) a bid to allow nontrade-related US economic sanctions on Chinese companies that sell weapons of mass destruction abroad. Under the amendment, a president could set in motion federal actions that result in a foreign company losing access to American markets. The amendment applied also to firms in Russia and North Korea. It was offered to legislation (HR 4444) to establish permanent, normal US trade with the People's Republic of China, a bill that remained in debate.

Fred D. Thompson, Republican from Tennessee, said it was wrong to trade with China while ignoring its weapons exports, "because if we ever signal to the world that we are more concerned with the trade dollar than we are with our own national security, we will not remain a superpower for very long."

William V. Roth Jr., Republican of Delaware, said that under the amendment, securities markets would be used "as a sanctioning tool." He called this "particularly troubling" because "the strength of our capital markets is based on a degree of predictability and political certainty that this amendment would undermine."

A "yes" vote was to kill the amendment.

CONNECTICUT. Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat voted yes. Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat, did not vote.

MAINE. Susan M. Collins, andOlympia J. Snowe, both Republicans, voted no.

MASSACHUSETTS. Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry, both Democrats, voted yes.

NEW HAMPSHIRE. Robert C. Smith and Judd Gregg, both Republicans, voted no.

RHODE ISLAND. John Reed, Democrat, and Lincoln Chafee, Republican, voted yes.

VERMONT. Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat, and James R. Jeffords, Republican, voted yes.

CODE OF CONDUCT: Voting 23 for and 73 against, the Senate on Sept. 13 refused to require the Department of Commerce to impose a code of conduct on US firms doing business in the People's Republic of China when trade is liberalized between the two countries. The amendment to HR 4444 (above) sought rules to ensure humane treatment of Chinese workers by their American employers.

Jesse Helms, Republican from North Carolina, said a code is needed because "the powerful lure of potential huge Chinese markets has obviously clouded the judgment of some of our top companies and some of their executives. With regret, I have concluded that they have been willing to supplicate to the Communist government of China."

William V. Roth Jr., Republican of Delaware, said: "There is no need to force American companies to adopt so-called voluntary codes of conduct with respect to their operations in China. They are already providing opportunities in China that confirm that there is a race to the top, not a race to the bottom, when American firms operate overseas."

A yes vote backed a code of conduct for American firms operating in China.

CONNECTICUT. Dodd voted no. Lieberman did not vote.

MAINE. Collins and Snowe voted yes.

MASSACHUSETTS. Kennedy did not vote. Kerry voted no.

NEW HAMPSHIRE. Robert Smith voted yes. Gregg voted no.

RHODE ISLAND. Reed and Chafee voted no.

VERMONT. Leahy voted no. Jeffords voted yes.

LOAD-DATE: September 26, 2000




Previous Document Document 251 of 334. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Permanent, Normal, Trade
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.