Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: PNTR

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 275 of 471. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Houston Chronicle Publishing Company  
The Houston Chronicle

 View Related Topics 

May 21, 2000, Sunday 2 STAR EDITION

SECTION: OUTLOOK; Pg. 2

LENGTH: 635 words

HEADLINE: CHINA TRADE;
Many reasons to do a fair deal with Asian giant

SOURCE: Staff

BODY:
The unlikely alliance of President Clinton and U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, has been working to pass it. A wide array of business and agricultural interests which stand to benefit has been supporting it. The trade-friendly House Ways and Means Committee, under the chairmanship of Houston's Rep. Bill Archer, has approved it by a 34-4 vote. The Senate Finance Committee voted in favor 18-1. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says it will be a boon to our economy. And even Taiwan supports it.

But legislation granting permanent normal trade relations (known as PNTR) to China, which is due up this week for a vote on the House floor, is far from a done deal.

Many in the House on both sides of the aisle, suspicious of Beijing or joining organized labor's opposition, are hostile to this important piece of legislation.

That's unfortunate. The legislation should be passed and signed into law.

There are many reasons to do so.

Start with Taiwan, an ally which is making many inroads into the mainland's economy, with something like $ 40 billion in investments in place or in the pipeline on behalf of some 40,000 Taiwanese companies. Newly elected President Chen Shui-bian has expressed strong support for lifting bans on direct trade and for China's entry into the World Trade Organization, which will come if PNTR is approved in the U.S. Congress.

Taiwanese see the move as a way to ease tensions across the Taiwan Strait, help lift Taiwan's economy and a constructive way to further engage the mainland Chinese.

It is, thus, a way to help assure U.S. security and strategic interests in the region and a way to increase the exposure of the repressive mainland regime to moderating outside influences.

For the United States, PNTR means fuller and fairer access to the huge and growing China market. For states like Texas, where sectors like trade, agriculture and techno-logy play such big roles, there will be many direct benefits.

Critics fear job losses, but in the last five years, while our trade deficit with China has more than doubled, our unemployment rate has fallen to a three-decade low, real wages and compensation are rising across all income groups and manufacturing output continues vigorously. The wider market that China represents will add to that dynamic.

And it's not just big business. A new report by the General Accounting Office demonstrates how increased trade will greatly benefit small- and medium-sized businesses. Increased trade has already nearly doubled the number of such businesses engaged in exporting since 1992. Ninety-seven percent of U.S. exporters in 1997 were firms of fewer than 500 employees, the report shows.

Furthermore, the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policies Studies refuted alarmist projections about the number of American jobs that would be lost to PNTR.

The figures show, says the study, that not more or fewer jobs, but better jobs will be created. Among the ways this will happen are by allowing Americans to export what we are best at producing and by facilitating exports to China from U.S. plants rather than being forced to build plants in China.

In essence, the opening of China's market that would come as a reciprocal of granting PNTR would allow the strongest sectors of our economy to compete there.

There are also provisions in the bill to set up closer monitoring of China's human rights record, which remains abysmal. What few improvements have come in the human rights arena have come as a result of engagement and not as a result of the annual debate that we have had in this country over whether to re-grant trade rights. Such a yearly debate is productive mostly as a forum for pandering and posturing by U.S. politicians.

There are many reasons to grant PNTR. These are just some of them.



TYPE: Editorial Opinion

LOAD-DATE: May 22, 2000




Previous Document Document 275 of 471. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: PNTR
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.