Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: PNTR

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 14 of 39. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The National Journal, Inc.  
The National Journal

May 27, 2000

SECTION: INSIDE WASHINGTON; Pg. 1657; Vol. 32, No. 22

LENGTH: 541 words

HEADLINE: Inside Washington for May 27, 2000

BODY:


Heads Up, UAL, K Street Is Mobilizing
The efforts of United Airlines and US Airways to obtain a federal
green light for their mega-merger will be met by an explosion of
lobbying from opponents of the deal. The American Society of
Travel Agents worries about the potential for reduced competition
and price inflation. The Business Travel Coalition, a group of
frequent-flying corporations, hopes that small and midsize
airlines will coalesce against the deal, fearing that the
alternative-merging themselves to keep pace-could be expensive
and messy. But the bigger carriers, sensing that United and US
Airways would give ground on competitive-access issues to get the
deal done, may have horse-trading on their minds. "A lot of
airlines would never try to prevent the merger, but I would not
be surprised if they tried to profit from it," one lobbyist said.
"Everyone in town who represents an aviation interest is looking
at it."
Al Gore and FDR; Is That a Ticket, or What?
Franklin Delano Raines, a running mate for Al Gore? Despite a
resume most overachievers only dream about, and the potential to
be the first African-American to hold the job, Raines plays down
the possibility. "I look at it as my friends playing a huge
practical joke on me," says Raines, former Clinton Administration
budget director and now head of mortgage wholesaler Fannie Mae.
The job would, of course, entail a major pay cut (last year he
drew $ 4.3 million, plus stock options). But Raines, who has three
young daughters, stresses family concerns: "As my wife has said,
she doesn't mind if I do it as long as I don't mind being
described as 'recently divorced.' "
The Rewards of Indecision on China
Look for a snowballing of thank-you fund-raisers for key House
members who, brows furrowed, announced-shortly before the big
vote-that, after deep soul-searching and meditation, they'd back
normalizing trade relations with China. Rep. Charles B. Rangel,
D-N.Y., a potentially pivotal undecided member until several days
before the May 24 vote, will be recognized next month for his
(eventual) clearheadedness. His campaign war chest will
presumably be topped off at the event, which is being
orchestrated by Bergner Bockorny, a lobbying firm that represents
the Business Roundtable. Separately, Rep. Martin Frost,
D-Texas, emerged from the undecided's den, sniffed the air, and-
just before he publicly embraced China-called Motorola Corp. to
see if they could help arrange a money bash for him. No promises,
but don't be surprised if Frost is accommodated, sooner rather
than later.
Bill Daley's Giant-Panda Ploy
Now it can be told: In the drive to win House backing for PNTR,
the White House considered exploiting China's most welcome
export-the giant panda. Idea was to speed up delivery of a pair
of panda cubs slated to replace the pair (now deceased) given to
the United States after Nixon's history-making flight to Beijing.
Commerce Secretary William M. Daley even raised the ploy with
China. The thought was that cuddly TV images of the pandas might
soften China's image on Capitol Hill. No deal, but the cubs are
still due later this year.

LOAD-DATE: May 29, 2000




Previous Document Document 14 of 39. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: PNTR
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.