Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: PNTR

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 18 of 39. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The National Journal, Inc.  
The National Journal

May 27, 2000

SECTION: POLITICS; Pg. 1709; Vol. 32, No. 22

LENGTH: 858 words

HEADLINE: At the Races: A Weekly Review of Campaign 2000

BYLINE: Gia Fenoglio

BODY:


Campaign Coffers
Jon S. Corzine, the former chairman of Goldman, Sachs & Co. who
is running for the Senate in New Jersey, is set to spend more
than $ 30 million before the June 6 primary. Most of it is his own
money; he earned $ 44 million in 1999.

     With what he's spending in the primary, Corzine could
afford to pay an entire Major League Baseball team's payroll for
a year. In fact, eight of the league's teams-including the
Montreal Expos and the Chicago White Sox, both playoff
contenders-have payrolls in the $ 35 million-and-under range.

     The Corzine campaign is releasing a $ 2 million-a-week
flood of television commercials questioning opponent Jim Florio's
positions on Social Security, according to a May 23 report in The
New York Times. For 10 weeks, Corzine has spent $ 1.3 million each
week on media buys; now the campaign says it will spend half
again that amount for each of the remaining two weeks. Corzine's
campaign is targeting New Jersey senior citizens, who are
expected to make up a third or more of voters.


Major League Baseball Team Payrolls On Par With Corzine's
Spending Level
Milwaukee Brewers        $ 36,505,333
Montreal Expos            34,807,833
Oakland Athletics         31,971,333
Chicago White Sox         31,133,500
Pittsburgh Pirates        28,928,333
Kansas City Royals        23,433,000
Florida Marlins           20,072,000
Minnesota Twins           16,519,500
(Research by Chris Cillizza)

Survey Says
As the debate over permanent normal trade status for China
recedes into the background, some analysts are wondering just how
much Americans really know-or care-about the intricacies of trade
policy. Results of a poll conducted in early May-as the media
wars on China trade were heating up-indicate a paradox. Americans
don't know much about trade, but they do seem to appreciate its
benefits.

     "What we found in the poll is that the public would like
more information from policy-makers about international trade,"
said Rebecca Woodings, a Washington-based trade consultant with
the law firm of Stewart and Stewart. Woodings, a member of the
Association of Women in International Trade, helped commission
EPIC/MRA of Lansing, Mich., to take the poll.

     When Americans were asked how much they actually knew
about international trade, 62 percent said they were "not at all"
or "only a little knowledgeable" about current trade issues.
Despite this knowledge gap, 57 percent "strongly" or "somewhat"
approved of free-trade agreements. Moreover, 83 percent agreed
with the proposition that the U.S. cannot expect foreign
countries to open their markets to American products if the U.S.
is unwilling to open its markets to foreign products.

     When asked whether imports provided Americans with a
broader selection of goods, 87 percent said yes; when asked
whether imports provided less-expensive goods, 74 percent agreed.
And when asked whether the United States would be better off or
worse off after approving PNTR with China, opinions ran 2-to-1 in
favor of "better off." A small comfort, perhaps, to members of
Congress skittish about losing support from unions and other
groups opposed to expanding free trade. (5/7-9/00; 850 adults;
margin of error plus or minus 3.4%). -Louis Jacobson
Verbatim
Excerpts from a May 23 interview with Gov. Tom Ridge of
Pennsylvania on CNN's Crossfire.
Bill Press: Several conservatives led by James Dobson, Alan
Keyes, and Gary Bauer said that if you're on the ticket, they're
going to take a hike. They can't support the ticket with you on
it. What do you tell them?

     Tom Ridge: The choice is Governor Bush's, and whomever
the governor selects, he will become the next Vice President of
the United States. And at the end of the day, hopefully Alan and
Gary and Jim will support Governor Bush. That should be their
ultimate objective: not worry about who No. 2 is, but getting
George Bush elected President.

     Press: Some Republicans have said that the Republican
Party platform ought to be changed either to take abortion out or
to reflect that Republicans can differ on that issue. Do you
agree with that?

     Ridge: Well, I agree with the principle that the platform
should represent the point of view of the nominee, and it's
pretty clear what Governor Bush's point of view is on this. So I
think at the end of the day, while you would probably love to
have us change just one word in that, I think it's better that we
confine our efforts ... because it's not the nominee's will, it's
not the majority of the delegates who'll be there, and focus our
efforts on defeating Vice President Al Gore. He's a very
formidable candidate, and this is not an issue that should divide
us.

     The journalists-15,000 journalists coming to
Philadelphia-would love it. Bill Richardson and Al Gore would
love to see ... all that infighting. And I say this is not the
time, this is not the place.

LOAD-DATE: May 29, 2000




Previous Document Document 18 of 39. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: PNTR
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.