Contact: |
John Schachter |
|
(202) 872-1260 |
Release Date: |
02/09/2001 |
Chief Executives Urge U.S.
Aggressiveness in Negotiating Trade Agreements
- Of the estimated 130 free trade agreements (FTAs) in
force around the world today only 2 include the
United States.
- Only 11 percent of world exports are covered by U.S.
FTAs, compared with 33 percent for European Union FTAs and
customs agreements.
- While Western European nations have negotiated 909
bilateral investment treaties, the United States is party to
43.
These are just a few of the alarming trade facts from The
Business Roundtable’s new paper – The Case for U.S. Trade
Leadership: The United States is Falling Behind – which
calls attention to the new era in trade negotiations, an era
of greatly expanded activism on trade on the part of our
trading partners. (To read the
full report, click here.)
"The numbers and facts are clear: the rest of the world is
more engaged than we are in shaping the future of global
trade," said Philip M. Condit, chairman of BRT’s International
Trade and Investment Task Force and chairman and CEO of The
Boeing Company. "It’s time to reinvigorate our trade efforts
and push forward aggressively. We cannot afford to be left
behind as other nations negotiate and reap the benefits of one
trade agreement after another, gaining access to markets that
should be benefiting American workers, farmers, consumers and
companies. It’s time for the United States to get back into
the game."
The BRT has long played a key role in trade issues for
years and led last year’s effort by the business community to
secure Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China. The new
BRT paper on trade leadership notes that the first step for
getting the United States "back into the game" is to build a
national consensus that can form the basis of an agreed
mandate from the Congress for the Executive Branch to move
forward on breaking down trade and investment barriers through
negotiations.
The BRT recognizes that labor and environmental issues are
important factors in forming such consensus. "We need to
address those issues," Condit said. "However, in pursuing
labor and environmental objectives, the United States should
not adopt a ‘one size fits all’ approach. The approach should
be tailored to individual circumstances, and it should be
based on the outcome of consultations among businesses, the
Congress, U.S. negotiators, labor, environmental groups, and
the countries with whom we are negotiating."
"We Have Nothing to Fear from Further Engagement in
Trade"
According to the paper, "The United States has, for more
than 50 years, pushed for a rules-based, global system of
trade agreements that serves to help all nations improve
living standards through economic progress. This historic
mission, stretching in an unbroken line over the service of
every President from Franklin Roosevelt to George W. Bush,
must not be lost. Nothing less than the expansion of peace and
security, not to speak of our own economic welfare, rests on
this effort. Now, especially, when the United States is the
most competitive nation in the world, we have nothing to fear
from further engagement in trade."
Among the other disquieting trade facts from the
report:
- The number of bilateral investment treaties (BITs)
quintupled during the 1990s, from 385 to 1,857. The
United States ranks only 26th in the number of BITs
concluded as of January 2000.
- 16 Western European countries have BITs with Brazil (the
largest country in Latin America), 16 with China (the
largest country in Asia), 10 with India (population nearly 1
billion), and 13 with Indonesia (population over 200
million). The United States has not signed a single BIT
with any of these nations.
- Even on our own continent, we’re faring poorly: Mexico
has FTAs with at least 28 countries; 25 of these agreements
were concluded since 1994.
U.S. businesses, workers and farmers face both an immediate
and long-term threat from being left out of international
trade and investment agreements. Immediately, they are forced
to compete on an uneven playing field. Longer term, our
trading partners are creating rules that cut against us and
are forming strategic alliances that are hostile to U.S.
interests. U.S. exports and jobs will pay a price for U.S.
inaction, the report notes.
"The United States is no longer the indispensable country
on trade," Condit added. "Compared with our most important
trading partners, we are clearly on the sidelines when it
comes to major agreements. Other nations are cutting deals
without us, gradually surrounding the United States with a
network of preferential trade agreements that benefit their
companies, their workers and their farmers at the expense of
ours."
# # # #
The Business Roundtable is an association
of chief executive officers of leading corporations with a
combined workforce of more than 10 million employees in the
United States. The chief executives are committed to
advocating public policies that foster vigorous economic
growth and a dynamic global economy.