The Allegations
"According to Sec. of Commerce Bill Daley, PMFN
isn't a legal necessity" -- Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Website,
February 10, 2000.
"...the Administration admits that this
[Permanent Normal Trade Relations] is not legally necessary for satisfying
international trade agreements..." International Campaign for Tibet
Website, February 15, 2000.
The Facts
- "As Congress begins to consider China's
entry into the WTO, I want to clearly reaffirm the need to grant
permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) to China in order to obtain the
full market-opening benefits negotiated last fall. Opponents of PNTR
have tried to confuse the issue by falsely claiming that some form of
periodic review of NTR status would be consistent with our WTO
obligations. That is simply not the case."
--Secretary of Commerce
William Daley, February 15, 2000
- "The United States must grant China
permanent NTR or risk losing the full benefits of the agreement we
negotiated... if Congress were to refuse to grant permanent NTR, our
Asian and European competitors will reap these benefits but American
farmers and businesses may well be left behind." --President Bill
Clinton, in a letter to Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, January 24,
2000
- "...failure to grant China permanent normal
trade relations will put American farmers and factories at a vast
disadvantage with respect to Europe and Japan and hurt our ability to
enforce China's commitments in the WTO." -- Vice President Al Gore,
quoted by the Associated Press, January 5, 2000
- "If we do not grant permanent NTR, we will
risk losing the market access benefits of the agreement, and the right
to enforce them through the WTO." -- Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright, to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 8,
2000
- "But we have one obligation: we must grant
China permanent NTR or risk losing the full benefits of the agreement we
negotiated, including special import protections, and rights to enforce
China's commitments through WTO dispute settlement." --U.S. Trade
Representative Charlene Barshefsky, to the National Conference of State
Legislators, February 4, 2000
- "Congress must answer a simple question:
will it grant China permanent Normal Trade Relations status, which is
the same arrangement we have given to 132 of the other 134 countries in
the WTO. Doing so is necessary to guarantee the full market-opening
benefits of the agreement we negotiated with China." --Samuel R. Berger,
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, Woodrow Wilson
International Center, February 2, 2000
(Emphasis on "permanent" added in each
case.) |