HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return to Search][Focus]
Search Terms: telephone tax

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 23 of 54. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Omaha World-Herald Company  
Omaha World-Herald

June 5, 2000, Monday SUNRISE EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. 6;

LENGTH: 386 words

HEADLINE: Wringing Out Phone Bills

BYLINE: 6

BODY:
    Nebraskans reading the news of late may conclude that their phone bills are automatically headed downward. But that isn't necessarily the case. True, Congress seems on course to eliminate a telephone tax that was established to finance the Spanish-American War. And the Federal Communications Commission just announced changes that could reduce long-distance charges for some users. But those rate reductions will vary among phone users, and many will see no reduction at all, due to their pattern of phone use. Moreover, in Nebraska and other states with sizable rural areas, rate reductions will be largely counterbalanced by subsidies that consumers provide to ensure that phone service remains affordable outside urban areas. This is a fundamental public interest. If left entirely to the whims of the market, phone rates would soar in places like Keya Paha County in northern Nebraska, or Dundy County in the state's southwestern corner, because phone companies face higher costs in serving such lightly populated areas. For decades, the federal government promoted universal phone access by allowing local phone companies to charge "access fees" to long-distance companies for using local phone lines. But a 1996 federal law, which sensibly reduced regulation in favor of the free market, is eliminating the access fees. An alternative revenue source is needed, since the obligation to provide universal access isn't going away. (Initiative 414, the confusing ballot measure shot down by Nebraska voters on a 58-42 percent vote in 1998, would have also eliminated the access fees, among other changes.) In Nebraska, the answer so far has been a monthly surcharge of nearly 7 percent placed on local phone service, begun last July. At the same time, costs are generally being shifted away from in-state long-distance service and toward local service. The Nebraska Public Service Commission may well adjust those arrangements in the future, given the flux in the phone industry and a request from U S West that the commission change the way long-distance service is regulated in the Omaha area. Even in an era of cell phones and Internet-aided phone service, the long-standing need for universal phone access continues. Nebraska's efforts to come up with an equitable system should continue also.

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

LOAD-DATE: June 6, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 23 of 54. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: telephone tax
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2000, LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.