HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return to Search][Focus]
Search Terms: telephone tax

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 42 of 54. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Houston Chronicle Publishing Company  
The Houston Chronicle

 View Related Topics 

May 14, 2000, Sunday 2 STAR EDITION

SECTION: OUTLOOK; Pg. 2

LENGTH: 292 words

HEADLINE: TAX ON TALKING;
Government still enjoys century-old temporary measure

SOURCE: Staff

BODY:
   Three percent of the cost of calling your mother today will go to the federal government due to a luxury tax first imposed 102 years ago to help finance the Spanish-American War.

The excise tax on talking over the telephone was supposed to be a temporary one when it was introduced in 1898.

Over the years it was repealed and then reimposed. Today, it is still there on your telephone bill, more than a full century after Teddy Roosevelt led his fabled charge up San Juan Hill.

Now a bipartisan effort is under way in Congress to repeal the tax - once and for all. Rep. Bill Archer, R-Houston, says the House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee will mark up a bill to eliminate the tax on Wednesday.

That would be a good idea. It's about time.

Why? Simple. The federal budget is considered to be in surplus, and telephones are no longer luxuries. Telephones are necessities. Try living or running a business without one.

This talking tax should be repealed for several reasons. It is regressive in that the poorest people pay at the same rate as the richest.

Repealing the tax would achieve what Congress intended in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 - to reduce the bills of telephone customers.

Finally, the tax is paid on Internet access, and more and more Americans have telephone lines dedicated for Internet service - this at a time when Congress does not want to be taxing the Internet.

Easy taxing of the public, like a 3 percent excise tax on everybody's telephone bill, is an idea that is naturally liked by government. It will be hard to put an end to it.

But repealing this unnecessary tax would save consumers $ 24 billion over five years. The lost taxes could be covered by the non-Social Security budget surplus.



LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

TYPE: Editorial Opinion

LOAD-DATE: May 15, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 42 of 54. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: telephone tax
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2000, LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.