Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: internet w/5 prescription

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 145 of 282. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Gannett Company, Inc.  
USA TODAY

January 3, 2000, Monday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 18A

LENGTH: 511 words

HEADLINE: Risks demand greater oversight

BODY:
When it comes to online prescriptions, President Clinton is absolutely
correct in charging that rogue Internet drugstores "pose a threat
to the health of Americans." Such sites employ anonymous doctors
to write dubious prescriptions based on unverified health claims,
then fill those prescriptions with a thin conscience for a fat
profit.


The results can be fatal, as in the case of an Illinois man with
a history of chest pain and family history of heart disease who
died last spring after taking Viagra that had been prescribed
online, without a physical exam.
Other perils include adverse drug interactions and mismedication
stemming from a pharmacy's inability to verify customer claims.
How can an Internet drugstore offering the weight-loss drug Xenical
know whether the person claiming obesity isn't instead anorexic?


Clinton is also correct when he suggests that the existing safety
net against prescription error and abuse is inadequate to regulate
Internet operators. Most online pharmacies are legitimate, but
the rogue sites operate well outside the reach of local and federal
regulations.


States can't control drugstore Web sites that operate across state
lines. Nor can they regulate doctors who sign prescriptions from
1,000 miles distant. Few have even tried, notable exceptions being
California and Kansas.


Beyond that, a new and highly touted industry program to certify
pharmacy Web sites is voluntary. Federally, the Food and Drug
Administration has neither the power nor the money to do much.


For these reasons, the White House last week proposed strengthening
the FDA's authority over Internet drugstores, giving it new subpoena
and enforcement powers and an extra $ 10 million to fund them.
Online drugstores would have to show compliance with state and
federal rules. Selling drugs without valid prescriptions would
bring a new $ 500,000 civil penalty.


Make no mistake: Not every online drugstore is a problem. Many
provide convenient, low-cost alternatives to time-pressed, cash-strapped
or homebound patients. But the proposed requirements ought not
be too much work for legitimate operators. All they have to do
is show that they are obeying state and federal laws.


Their unscrupulous brethren are another matter. Last fall, two
Pennsylvania physicians writing in the Annals of Internal Medicine
reported that the median cost of a visit to an Internet physician
was 16% higher than a visit to a general-practice physician in
Philadelphia. Researchers also found that the median Internet
price for two commonly prescribed drugs was 10% higher than in
local drugstores.


Plainly, rogue Internet pharmacies are gouging consumers as well
as endangering their health. And they get away with it because
the existing state-industry regulatory structure is unable to
meet the challenges of Internet prescriptions. This is a national
problem, and it deserves a federal solution. OUR VIEW <>Online
prescriptions <>Proposal would boost FDA authority
over Net drugstores.

LOAD-DATE: January 03, 2000




Previous Document Document 145 of 282. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: internet w/5 prescription
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.