CUNA
Applauds Court Rejection of Credit Union Membership Rules Injunction
March 10, 1999
CONTACT: Mark Wolff (202) 218-7745
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Thursday, March 10) – Calling it a victory for
consumers, CUNA President and CEO Dan Mica lauded today’s decision
by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly denying the
American Bankers Association’s (ABA) request for a preliminary
injunction against the National Credit Union Administration’s (NCUA)
new chartering rule.
"All along we have felt this case, and particularly this
injunction request, have no merit. This was simply an attempt by
banks’ to harass credit unions," said CUNA President and CEO Dan
Mica. "The ruling today was crystal clear. It is in the public’s
best interest to allow credit unions to grow as Congress intended
when it passed our bill last year."
"The banks simply did not meet the burden of proof," explained
CUNA General Counsel Eric Richard. "The judge could clearly see that
the harm credit unions would suffer from an injunction far
outweighed any harm the new rules may cause banks."
The ABA filed suit in January against NCUA for its new chartering
rule, which was written in response to last year’s enactment of the
Credit Union Membership Access Act. ABA claimed the new rule was
illegal and went beyond Congressional intent. They requested a
preliminary injunction to prevent NCUA from approving charter
expansions under the new rule, and declare null and void those
approved since the policy took effect January 1.
CUNA filed to intervene in the case in mid-January, along with
the National Association of Federal Credit Unions (NAFCU).
With its network of affiliated state credit union leagues,
CUNA represents America's 11,500 credit unions -- which in turn are
owned by more than 74 million consumers. Credit unions are
not-for-profit cooperatives providing affordable financial services
to people from all walks of life.
Advertising
opportunities with CUNA
|