Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: abortion, bankruptcy

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 26 of 146. Next Document

Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

May 9, 2002, Thursday ,THIRD EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A18

LENGTH: 467 words

HEADLINE: CARD SHARKS

BODY:
FOR THE PAST five years, credit card companies and banks have used generous campaign contributions to lobby Congress for a new bankruptcy law that would make it tougher for consumers to get relief from their debt. At the same time, the industry rejects any suggestion that it stop encouraging irresponsible credit practices by showering the public with pitches for more credit cards.

All of the companies' investment in Congress is on the verge of paying off. The only issue holding up conference committee agreement on new bankruptcy legislation is a provision from the Senate side forbidding the use of bankruptcy by abortion opponents to protect themselves from court-imposed fines or damages for violent protests at clinics.    The House version of the bill has no such language, and prolife House members are balking at approving a bill that would penalize abortion opponents. While it is wrong for antiabortion groups to use the bankruptcy law this way, it is not good policy to single out one group. What should doom the bill is the burden it places on struggling families.

The terms agreed upon in conference commitee do nothing, for instance, to redress the unfairness of requiring onerous payments from low-income families in trouble while letting someone like Burt Reynolds protect a $2.5 million house even after running up $10 million in debts. The Senate wanted to cap at $125,000 the equity value of a home that a debtor can protect in the seven states, including Florida and Texas, that have generous homestead allowances for mansion-owning bankrupts. But the House wouldn't hear of it.

The thrust of the legislation is to make it more difficult for consumers to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which lets them get out from under credit card debt and other unsecured loans. More would have to file under Chapter 13, which can require stiff repayment schedules. Advocates for children worry that child support claims would take a back seat to debt repayments after a debtor parent went through a Chapter 13.

Promoters of a revised bankruptcy law warn that the current law is being abused by wealthy deadbeats. In fact, a 1999 study by federal bankruptcy judges found that the median income of debtors seeking bankruptcy protection was $21,500. A recent upsurge in filings is an accurate reflection of the impact that layoffs, divorces, and medical emergencies have had on the bankruptcy rate.

According to the Consumer Federation of America, the credit industry flooded consumers - including college students with no independent support - with 5 billion solicitations in 2001, an increase of 43 percent over the 3.5 billion in 2000. An industry that really favored more responsible credit practices would start by being more selective in its marketing.

LOAD-DATE: May 11, 2002




Previous Document Document 26 of 146. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: abortion, bankruptcy
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.