Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: abortion, bankruptcy

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 76 of 146. Next Document

Copyright 2001 The Washington Post  
The Washington Post

January 19, 2001, Friday, Final Edition

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A36

LENGTH: 753 words

HEADLINE: The Ashcroft Nomination

BODY:


John Ashcroft testified before the Senate committee considering his nomination that he will not seek to have Roe v. Wade reversed, and that he doesn't think the Second Amendment forbids reasonable regulation of guns.

Abortion and gun control were the issues Mr. Ashcroft used to entice people to vote for him. Was he lying during the campaign, or is he lying to the Senate? Either way, it seems to me that the administration that promised to restore integrity and dignity to the White House is trying to foist a liar onto the American people to serve as our chief law enforcement officer.

If you want to know who Mr. Ashcroft will really go to bat for, all you have to do is remember the old Watergate admonition: Follow the money. Mr. Ashcroft's real constituents are the pharmaceutical and insurance companies as well as various other anti-consumer health care lobbies that paid out nearly $ 1 million in contributions to Mr. Ashcroft's reelection campaign. It was money well spent. Four times in the past year he voted against prescription-drug benefits for Medicaid recipients; twice he helped kill the bipartisan Patients' Bill of Rights, which would have allowed consumers to sue managed care companies for delayed or denied care. He also backed a phony business-sponsored Patients' Bill of Rights that would prohibit consumers from suing their managed care providers. As Casey Stengel would say: "You can look it up." WILLIAM C. STOSINE

Iowa City

*





The Jan. 16 Style story on Attorney General-designate John Ashcroft distorted what he said in a Claremont Institute dinner speech on Oct. 13, 1997. The story attributes to Mr. Ashcroft the view "that proposed national history standards made too much of the Ku Klux Klan and nothing at all of Lee."

In fact, Mr. Ashcroft was bemoaning the collapse of national history standards, as described by then-chair of the National Endowment for the Humanities, Lynne Cheney. To quote his words, "She watched as references to Robert E. Lee, as references to the Wright Brothers and Thomas Edison, as references to Paul Revere were taken out of the history textbooks and replaced by references -- 17 of them, as a matter of fact -- to the Ku Klux Klan." His remarks did not emphasize Lee, any more than they emphasized aviation or electricity.

Given the Claremont Institute's attachment to the principles of Abraham Lincoln, had Mr. Ashcroft been the pro-slavery apologist or Ku Klux Klan enthusiast The Post's account insinuates, he would never have been invited to our dinner, or he would have been chased out of the room for making such odious remarks.

THOMAS B. SILVER

President

The Claremont Institute

Claremont, Calif.

*



Richard Cohen [op-ed, Jan. 11] mistakenly asserts that Sen. Ashcroft is being labeled a racist solely on his opposition to Judge White's appointment to the federal bench. On the contrary, Mr. Ashcroft has earned that label by endorsing values espoused in Southern Partisan magazine, which pays tribute to the Confederacy and the Ku Klux Klan. Mr. Ashcroft is on record thanking Southern Partisan for "setting the record straight" on the Civil War. Further, he accepted an honorary degree from Bob Jones University, whose recent racist and anti-gay policies are well known.

JON-PETER KELLY

New York

*



The Jan. 9 front-page article "Abortion Rights Key in Fight Over Ashcroft" quoted GOP officials as saying that Attorney General-nominee John Ashcroft's support of "a measure last year that bars clinic protesters from filing for bankruptcy as a protection from lawsuits" is proof that he is not the unbending ideologue that abortion rights groups say he is.

However, the so-called bankruptcy reform bill, wisely killed by President Clinton, was designed mainly to prevent ordinary individuals from receiving bankruptcy protection from credit card companies and other financial industries.

When he was a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Ashcroft was a supporter of the bill and a recipient of the credit card lobbyists' largess.

Bankruptcy reform enjoys bipartisan support, but the most conservative congressional Republicans have sought to cast the issue as one of morality rather than one of creditor-debtor law. The GOP's specious citation of Mr. Ashcroft's position on this issue in his defense should be disconcerting to the senators whose job it is to confirm or reject his nomination, and to all Americans.

BILL MURPHY JR.

Washington



LOAD-DATE: January 19, 2001




Previous Document Document 76 of 146. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: abortion, bankruptcy
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.