BANKRUPTCY REFORM ACT OF 1999 -- (Extensions of Remarks - May 06,
1999)
[Page: E899]
---
SPEECH OF
HON. PATSY T. MINK
OF HAWAII
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
THURSDAY, MAY 6, 1999
The House in Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union had under
consideration the bill (H.R. 833) to amend title 11 of the United States Code,
and for further purposes:
- Mrs. MINK of Hawaii. Mr. Chairman, I rise to express my opposition to the
passage of H.R. 833, the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999. I will vote `No' on
final passage, not because I believe that the bankruptcy system doesn't need
reformulation, but because H.R. 833 is an unbalanced piece of legislation
which does not offer the flexibility to accommodate the diverse circumstances
confronted by debtors and bankruptcy courts.
- The American Bankruptcy system was designed to give individuals who found
themselves in insurmountable debt the chance to start over again. H.R. 833
threatens the promise of a fresh start by forcing the myriad situations
debtors face into a narrow, rigid formula. The strict, Internal Revenue
Service ``means test'' used to calculate the average monthly expenses for all
debtors does not even account for regional income and cost of living
differences. In my own state of Hawaii, the cost of living is high. This
provision will unjustly penalize my constituents who seek bankruptcy relief
because their actual, higher living costs will be ignored. H.R. 833's
proponents consistently refused proposals to create a more flexible means
test.
- H.R. 833 strips bankruptcy judges of the power to determine that
exceptional circumstances exist in certain cases and adjust monthly expense
allowances to accommodate such situations. Instead of seeking to find the best
course of action to help debtors become solvent, H.R. 833, as amended, allows
bankruptcy trustees who transfer their clients' petitions from Chapter 7 to
Chapter 13 to be paid for doing so. This is bad, lop-sided policy.
- H.R. 833 rewards credit card companies' practice of pushing easy credit on
debt heavy clients. They are the only winners in this debate. The policy to
force more debtors from Chapter 7 bankruptcy into Chapter 13 bankruptcy
benefits only those creditors whose debts are dischargeable in Chapter 7 and
not under Chapter 13: Credit Card Companies. H.R. 833 makes credit card debt
nondischargeable under Chapter 13 and puts these debts in the same category as
child support and alimony payments.
- I believe that people should be held personally accountable for their
debts. I voted Yes on the substitute bill offered by Congressman
NADLER, which would have reformed bankruptcy provisions in a fair,
balanced manner. I regret that Mr. NADLER's restructuring substitute
did not pass. I voted to pass the amendment offered by the Chairman and
Ranking Member of the Judiciary Committee, Congressman HENRY HYDE and
Congressman JOHN CONYERS which created a flexible method of computing a
debtor's monthly living expenses by providing guidelines to account for
extenuating circumstances. This bipartisan amendment balanced a creditor
biased bill. The Hyde-Conyers amendment also failed.
- As the bill stands, I am unable to vote for it.
END