LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe-Document
LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic
Copyright 1999 Journal Sentinel Inc.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
June 10, 1999 Thursday
Final
SECTION: Business
Pg. 1
LENGTH: 927 words
HEADLINE: Debtor firms turn to Delaware for relief
Harnischfeger latest to file for bankruptcy outside its home state
BYLINE: MARK SAVAGE
SOURCE: Journal Sentinel staff
BODY:
When Harnischfeger Industries Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
in Delaware Monday it followed the lead of many large corporations, including
the likes of Chicago-based Montgomery Ward
& Co.
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware is considered a haven for large corporate
bankruptcy filings.
"I think it's safe to say that debtors' lawyers feel Delaware is a friendly
court," said Robert Ginsberg, a federal judge in Chicago who served on the National
Bankruptcy Review Commission.
That group, appointed by the president, Congress and chief justice of the U.S.
Supreme Court, issued a 1,300-page report in 1997 that made 172 recommendations
for
bankruptcy law
reform, including one that said corporations should only be able to file for Chapter
11 in their
principal place of business in the United States.
"That was the least controversial decision in the report," said Brady Williamson, a Madison lawyer who headed the commission.
The provision is included in a
bankruptcy reform bill that passed the House of Representatives in May, but it has been omitted
from the Senate bill that recently cleared its Judiciary Committee, whose
leading minority member is Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.)
Delaware's federal court leads the nation in handling Chapter 11 cases. For
instance, from March 1998 to March of this year it dealt with 329 cases,
compared with the 23 that passed through federal court in Milwaukee, which
serves eastern Wisconsin.
Harnischfeger executives were unavailable for comment Wednesday about the St.
Francis-based firm's decision to file in Delaware. But Dave Brukardt, the
firm's spokesman, said the firm filed there because it is incorporated in
Delaware.
Current law allows a firm to file where it or its subsidiaries have major
operations or in its state of incorporation. Many firms are incorporated in
Delaware due to favorable corporate laws, especially those that protect company
executives from liability suits.
Under the current law, area and Chicago bankruptcy lawyers also say, it's not
unusual to advise corporate clients to file in Delaware.
The lawyers, who asked not to be named, said it's believed the federal judges
in Delaware have more experience with bankruptcy cases than local federal
judges and have a track record that makes it easier to predict the outcome of a
filing there.
Many said the Delaware judges are considered to be debtor friendly, meaning
they give the benefit of the doubt to the firm filing for bankruptcy protection
instead of to creditors.
Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard
University and a bankruptcy expert, is appalled by such reasoning. She said the
purpose of the law is to be even-handed with equal treatment for all.
"I'm troubled by debtors deciding in advance what type of judge they want. It
implies we have a system of justice for hire," Warren said.
"The only people who get to make this choice is the large corporation, not a
struggling family. . . . It's also insulting to the local judges, saying that
they can't handle such cases."
Warren added that the P.A. Bergner
& Co. bankruptcy trial here in 1991 proved there is plenty of local legal
talent.
John Byrnes, the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee in Milwaukee, agrees.
"We've had a lot of experience in corporate bankruptcy here, so that's not an
issue anymore," he said.
"The question is, 'Do you think you're likely to get your way?' And I'm assuming
they wouldn't
file there if they didn't think they'd get their way."
Warren also notes that prior to a law change in 1978, companies could not file
outside their home areas.
She and others associated with the bankruptcy review commission say the law
needs to be changed back for several reasons.
"The local interests are harmed in such a case. They have no input. They are
shut out of the process," said Ginsberg.
Warren said smaller creditors, many of whom usually are located near a firm's
main plants, local employees and their unions, and concerned shareholders are
excluded from participating in the bankruptcy hearings because they can't
afford to travel to Delaware or hire lawyers there. Delaware mandates that
local lawyers be used in the bankruptcy hearings.
In addition, she said some creditors find it difficult to hire Delaware lawyers
because they are too busy representing the debtors or large creditors that will
pay
a higher fee.
The review commission also noted in its report that
"choosing a distant forum also has the effect of reducing local press coverage." Warren agreed, saying such a move makes covering the proceedings more
difficult and expensive, and she adds that many firms simply
"hope to escape local scrutiny."
It's possible the law could change if the House version of the
bankruptcy reform bill is adopted. But that is far from certain.
Wisconsin's senators, Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both Democrats, said through
press aides that they would support wording to change the current Senate bill
to include a provision limiting a company's ability to file for bankruptcy to
its main area of business. That would mean a Wisconsin-based firm would have to
file in Wisconsin.
But there has been no such amendment offered on the Senate side.
Ken Klee, a UCLA law
professor, said most of the country is in favor of an amendment to the bill to
match the House's version, but it needs a push from a Midwestern or Western
senator.
"There's strong grass roots support for this among creditors and lawyers who are
off the eastern seacoast," Klee said.
LOAD-DATE: June 14, 1999