Copyright 1999 Star Tribune   
Star Tribune 
(Minneapolis, MN) 
December 18, 1999, Saturday, Metro Edition 
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 1A 
LENGTH: 1632 words 
HEADLINE: 
Commuter rail, the other line, is taking shape; 
A St. 
Cloud-to-Minneapolis line could be in operation by 2003. 
BYLINE: Laurie Blake; Staff Writer 
BODY: 
While the public spotlight has been focused 
on the Twin Cities area's first light-rail line, work on the region's first 
commuter-rail line has been chugging ahead quietly. 
     Now, after three years of study and 
design, the proposed 80-mile Northstar line is about to pull into view for 
serious scrutiny. 
      The plan is to run 
18 passenger trains a day on existing freight tracks between 
St. Cloud and Minneapolis. Four counties, 15 cities and four townships along the 
route are pushing the project with hopes of starting service by 2003, the same 
year light-rail service is expected to begin along Hiawatha Avenue in 
Minneapolis. 
    The Northstar would require 
$223 million in public funding and approval by the Burlington 
Northern Santa Fe railroad, which owns the tracks. And because 
commuter rail proponents are counting on $89 
million from the state, the project's fate is expected to be sealed in the 
upcoming legislative session.       "A lot now 
hangs on what the public decides to do with respect to supporting the project," 
said DJ Mitchell, assistant vice president of passenger operations for 
Burlington. 
     Although Burlington officials 
are open to sharing Minnesota tracks with passenger trains _ the company already 
shares tracks in other cities _ the railroad will not complete negotiations 
until project financing is secured, Mitchell said. 
    The prospects for state funding are unclear. 
Gov. Jesse Ventura mentioned the project in his inaugural speech, but the 
administration hasn't decided what transportation funding to recommend. 
Northstar officials have hired a lobbyist but have not identified legislators 
who will push for funding. And Transportation Commissioner Elwyn Tinklenberg, 
who likes the Northstar proposal, said his own goal is to establish a fund for 
transit projects _ much like the gasoline tax dedicated to road improvements _ 
so transit improvements can be freed from project-by-project political approval. 
      Northstar proponents say they are 
optimistic that legislators will recognize the need to plan for coming growth 
and traffic congestion. 
    "Some people are against 
everything and some people are afraid of change," said Anoka County Commissioner 
Paul McCarron, a leading commuter- rail proponent. "But I think that under close 
examination they will see that this would serve the greater good. 
      "It will move a maximum number of 
people with a minimum amount of cost _ less cost than expanding the roads or 
putting in light rail," he said. 
     The 
Minnesota Transportation Department has ranked the Northstar as the state's most 
promising commuter-rail line. Studies have begun on two others: the Dan Patch 
line from Lakeville to Minneapolis and the Red Rock line from Hastings to St. 
Paul. 
. 
Relief for Hwy. 10 
     Work on the Northstar began when it became 
clear that the area northwest of Minneapolis would not be a choice for light 
rail, McCarron said. The line was conceived as an alternative to Hwy. 10, which 
is jammed with commuters at rush hour and is expected to become more congested 
as the area northwest of the Twin Cities grows. Now, Hwy. 10 carries an average 
of 68,000 cars a day in the city of Anoka, according to the Transportation 
Department. 
In addition to its use by the work force, supporters say, 
the train would allow students to live at home and commute to the University of 
Minnesota or to St. Cloud State University. And some are looking forward to 
taking a commuter train to downtown Minneapolis to connect with the Hiawatha 
Avenue light-rail line en route to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International 
Airport. 
    Ridership estimates forecast 9,340 
rides a day in 2003, or about 2.8 million rides a year. 
   John Weaver, an Anoka City Council member, thinks 
ridership would grow as the frustration increases with delays on Hwy. 10. "This 
will be a marvelous relief valve that we need," Weaver said. 
    The popularity of the project has astounded 
Sherburne County Commissioner Betsy Wergin, chairwoman of the Northstar Corridor 
Development Authority, the joint powers board overseeing the project. Wergin 
said she was initially a skeptic. "What I hear when I go everywhere is, 'You've 
got to do this,' " she said. 
. 
Railroad is cooperating 
     Burlington has been supportive and 
involved in discussions about the project, said McCarron, the Anoka County 
commissioner. 
     The railroad has commuter 
trains running on its tracks in Chicago and Los Angeles and will soon add them 
in Seattle, the company's Mitchell said. 
     Besides buying the trains, the capital 
costs connected with commuter rail come in the construction of stations and in 
the track improvements necessary for safe and efficient sharing of the tracks by 
passengers and freight. 
    Some of the negotiations 
between Northstar officials and the railroad focus on what track improvements 
are necessary and how much each side will pay. 
      Burlington would be paid for the 
passenger train use of its track but does not expect to make a lot of profit 
from the service, Mitchell said. 
     The 
primary concern for the company is that it must be sure that the passenger 
service does not get in the way of or delay its freight operations, he 
said.      Among the opponents of the project are 
two Republican legislators from the area that would be served by the rail line. 
       Rep. Mark Olson, R-Big Lake, 
said people support the rail line not because they plan to use it but because 
they think it will get other drivers off the road. "I think it's a fun and 
exciting thing for us to consider . . .," he said. But when people look at the 
facts, support for the project will fade, he said. 
     Sen. Mark Ourada, R-Buffalo, a member of 
the Senate Transportation Committee, said he is skeptical of the benefit 
commuter rail would provide for the money. "To my way of thinking we may be much 
better off to say, 'Let's spend that on technology and telecommuting capability 
so that people don't have to commute at all.' " 
. 
Service in 
2003 
   Unlike light rail, which runs on its own tracks 
and provides frequent, all-day service, commuter rail would run only at rush 
hours. The tracks would have to be kept open for freight transportation most of 
the day. 
     But like the proposed Hiawatha 
light-rail line, which has received $120 million in state 
funding, the Northstar must receive a funding commitment from the state to win 
approval from the Federal Transit Administration and $111 
million from the federal government. 
     Though officials wince at the suggestion 
that the two projects are competing for funding, both need money from the same 
federal transportation fund. 
    Commuter rail 
officials hope to receive a favorable rating for the project from the Transit 
Administration in February or March. 
     The 
long-range plan is to connect the light-rail and commuter-rail lines with a 
station in downtown Minneapolis behind the Target Center. 
     In August, the Northstar development 
authority hired Shandwick Research International to conduct a telephone poll of 
500 residents living within 5 miles of the Northstar line. Seventy-three percent 
of respondents said they considered commuter rail a good idea, and 17 percent 
said they would use the line to commute to work. 
      All four counties touched by the 
rail line _ Sherburne, Benton, Anoka and Hennepin _ have agreed to pay part of 
the 10 percent county share of the project. The county portion would come to 
$23 million in 2003 dollars. 
      Besides its cost, the biggest 
concern about the project is who would pay the operating costs _ 
$13.8 million a year in 2003 dollars. County and city officials 
do not want their residents to pay. 
     The 
issue is unresolved. The Transportation Department will present a commuter-rail 
master plan early next year that would help the Legislature get a commuter-rail 
system going, but it would leave funding an open political question. 
     _ Laurie Blake can be reached by e-mail at 
Gettingthere@startribune.com. 
. 
More information: 
     - Phone: Northstar Corridor Development 
Authority, 612-323-5692. 
     - Web: 
http://www.brwinc.com/northstar. 
     - What's 
next: Planning meetings will begin in late January or early February to gather 
public input on station amenities. 
. 
Rail projects at a glance 
. 
Northstar commuter rail 
What is it?: Commuter rail is 
passenger train service that operates on existing freight railroad tracks. In 
cars pulled by diesel locomotives, commuter rail serves longer trips from 
suburban markets and operates primarily from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 6 
p.m. 
Length: 80 miles. 
Anticipated ridership: 9,996 rides a day 
or about 2.8 million rides a year by 2003. 
Capital cost: 
$223 million _ 50 percent federal, 40 percent state and 10 
percent county funding. 
Operating costs: $13.8 million 
a year including the cost of feeder buses (in 2003 dollars). Passenger fees 
would offset some of this cost. 
Operating cost per rider: 
$4.95. 
Operating subsidy per rider: 
$3.47 in 2003, assuming that tickets pay 30 percent of 
operating costs. Source of subsidy has not been identified. 
. 
Hiawatha Avenue light rail 
What is it?: Light rail runs on its 
own tracks, offering frequent service through the day. It uses electric power 
carried by overhead wires. 
Length: 12 miles. 
Anticipated 
ridership: X,XXX per day, or X.X million per year by XXXX. 
Capital cost: 
$548 million in 2002 dollars. 
Operating costs: 
$9.9 million a year. 
Operating cost per rider: 
$X.XX 
Operating subsidy per rider: 
$X.XX 
. 
Source: Minnesota Department of 
Transportation; Northstar Corridor Development Authority 
. 
Star 
Tribune map by Jane Friedmann 
GRAPHIC: MAP; 
PHOTO 
LOAD-DATE: December 20, 1999