Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: commuter AND freight

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 181 of 195. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune  
The Tampa Tribune

 View Related Topics 

March 3, 1999, Wednesday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NATION/WORLD, Pg. 22

LENGTH: 446 words

HEADLINE: Bud Shuster's words of wisdom;


BODY:


U.S. Rep. Bud Shuster, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, made a  field trip to Tampa the other day to see our port, airport and highways.

There is general agreement here on the importance of air and sea transport, but the community is  divided on ground transportation - whether to continue to depend entirely on roads or to augment  them with a commuter rail line that would largely follow existing freight rail rights of way.

Shuster's advice: If you can, build rail. "When you have right of way, you're halfway there," he told us. "Light rail seems to be pretty darn  efficient."

This from a solidly conservative congressman representing a Pennsylvania mountain district that  has been Republican since 1860.

Shuster helped deregulate trucking and has consistently pushed to give local governments more  say in how federal transportation money is spent. Now up to half the federal gasoline tax revenue  in any one category can be diverted to another, which means some highway money can be spent on  transit and vice versa. This flexibility gives state and local governments more power, which puts  them under more pressure to make intelligent choices.

The new transportation law is sending Florida about $ 440 million more per year, a sum that  partially corrects the old funding formula that for years shortchanged fast-growing states.

Shuster argues convincingly that all federal gasoline taxes should be spent on transportation  and that all airline ticket taxes should be spent on aviation improvements. If the money isn't  needed, reduce the tax rate. But the money is desperately needed, so Congress should invest it to  improve the national economy and public safety.

He dismisses as ill-informed the often repeated criticism that Congress loaded the latest  highway bill with pork. High-priority congressional projects account for 5 percent of the spending,  and all those projects required the written support of the state departments of transportation.  Even if all these special projects are unnecessary fat, which they aren't, the remaining 95 percent  of the money is going back to state and local governments.

Shuster, a veteran of the endless tug of war over limited revenues, conceded, "These decisions  are not made by angels up in heaven."

They are made largely by men and women here at the local level, and the better informed they  are, the more wisely they will invest taxpayers' money. It should interest them that the neutral  advice from conservative Bud Shuster, who is neither campaigning here nor speculating in local real  estate, is to seriously consider rail.

NOTES: EDITORIALS

LOAD-DATE: March 4, 1999




Previous Document Document 181 of 195. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: commuter AND freight
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.