LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe-Document
LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic
Copyright 2000 The Omaha World-Herald Company
Omaha World-Herald
March 17, 2000, Friday
SUNRISE EDITION
SECTION: EDITORIAL;
Pg. 24
LENGTH: 644 words
HEADLINE: Air Justice
BYLINE: 5
BODY:
The U.S. House of Representatives' overwhelming passage of a bill to spend $
40 billion over three years for air-travel improvement is good for airports in
general and good for airports in Nebraska and Iowa in particular. It also
addresses a point of fundamental fairness.
For years Congress has bottled up money from the
Aviation Trust Fund, which takes in about $ 10 billion a year in user fees. The central purpose of
the
fund has been to finance airport improvements and maintenance, and in theory it was
earmarked for that. But the money was left unspent as a piece of fiscal
sleight-of-hand meant to make federal deficits appear smaller.
For Rep. Bud Shuster, R-Pa., chairman of the House Transportation Committee,
it became almost a moral crusade to get the
fund separated from the general budget, with its revenues to be used solely for
airport projects. After years of impasse, the Senate agreed that, without
actually separating the
funds, spending on airports each year will equal or exceed the
fund's revenues and interest.
That looks like a distinction without a difference, but so be it. That's
politics. The cork is out of the bottle. At bottom, this was made possible by
two factors: (1) The federal government, at least by some accounting methods,
is now running surpluses, not deficits. (2) It's an election year - the House
passed the measure by better than 3-to-1.
The legislation also raised the cap on airport-imposed
passenger fees, from $ 3 to $ 4.50. This is mostly to the good, since local
airports commonly use them for improvements to benefit those same passengers.
For the record, that $ 1.50 increase is going to look like $ 6 on a lot of
airline tickets.
That's because on a round-trip ticket, the fee gets you literally coming and
going, and it can be imposed for a maximum of two segments on each flight.
Thus, a passenger flying, say, from Omaha to Orlando with a stop in St. Louis
and returning could rack up four of those $ 1.50 increases. (That's up to the
individual airports, but it's hard to imagine many of them forgoing the
revenue.)
A dozen airports in Nebraska and Iowa, with Omaha's Eppley Airfield leading
the way, will get their federal entitlements doubled over each of the next
three years. For Eppley, this
means more than $ 7 million for construction that wasn't there before - just
what is needed by an airport whose passenger boardings are expected to double
in the next 11 years.
Some other aspects of the bill are equally welcome.
Of prime concern, modernizing the nation's decrepit air traffic control system
will get a substantial boost, nearly $ 1 billion per year. In addition, there
are provisions to help airlines buy so-called
"regional" jets, provided they use them to serve small airports. There are
funds to help improve the training of airport security checkpoint personnel, as well
as money to put emergency locator devices on smaller jets.
The measure also mandates collision-avoidance systems for cargo planes, adds
protections for whistleblowers on safety-related issues, and increases
penalties against unruly passengers.
Some
critics say that by allowing more flights into some major airports, the bill
will increase congestion and compromise safety. But the improved air-traffic
handling system should largely address such concerns. And, realistically, it is
hard to know how Congress could have put this off much longer in good
conscience. By one FAA projection, during the next 11 years the number of large
passenger jets needing access to the skies and gate space at airports is
expected to grow by half.
It took too long, but justice has been done. In a practical sense, the money
in the
Aviation Trust Fund has belonged to air passengers all along. At last, they'll see it coming back.
LOAD-DATE: March 17, 2000