LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe-Document
LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic
Copyright 1999 The Washington Post
The Washington Post
View Related Topics
June 15, 1999, Tuesday, Final Edition
SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A32
LENGTH: 380 words
HEADLINE: Pigs With Wings
BODY:
THE HOUSE will be asked this week to put
aviation spending at the absolute head of the line in the competition for federal
funds, ahead of national defense, law enforcement, tax collection, education, you
name it. The exemption from normal budget constraints is the brainchild of
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bud Shuster, who won a
similarly ill-advised and budget-bending bye for highways in the last Congress.
The chairmen of the budget, tax and appropriations committees -- Reps. John
Kasich, Bill Archer and Bill Young -- will jointly urge that the money grab be
stricken from what would then become a conventional federal
aviation reauthorization bill. It's extraordinary to have these three aligned this way.
Theirs is the right position, and the House should have the sense and
self-respect to uphold it.
There may well be a need for an increase in airport and airway spending, as Mr.
Shuster contends. But the government faces many needs; the annual judgment of
which ones to satisfy is what Mr. Shuster would essentially suspend in the
aviation industry's behalf. His justification is partly that since the money in the
aviation trust fund comes from
aviation taxes, it should all automatically be spent for
aviation purposes. But total
aviation spending is regularly more than total
aviation taxes, in that billions in general
funds also are used; the traveling public which pays the
aviation taxes is hardly being shortchanged.
Mr. Shuster suggests that no competing governmental interest would suffer at
the hands of
aviation were his bill enacted. But that, too, is obviously wrong. There is only so
much money to go around; if
aviation gets more, something else gets less. The
congressman claims to have an understanding with House Speaker Dennis Hastert
to the effect that if this bill passes, the tax cut the Republicans want to
give will be correspondingly reduced -- and otherwise that
aviation taxes will be cut. But tax committee Chairman Archer has said pointedly that
he is not a party to that understanding.
The Senate has also gone on record against what Mr. Shuster proposes. The House
has budget problems enough without this gambit, which the administration also
opposes, and which both parties should vote down.
LOAD-DATE: June 15, 1999