Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: ESEA, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 226 of 317. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

MAY 11, 1999, TUESDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 769 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED STATEMENT OF
REP. MICHAEL. N. CASTLE
BEFORE THE HOUSE EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE COMMITTEE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON EARLY CHILDHOOD, YOUTH AND FAMILIES
SUBJECT - EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
AUTHORIZED UNDER ESEA

BODY:

Good Afternoon.
"l would like to take this opportunity to welcome you to the second hearing held by our Subcommittee on an issue that is very important to all of us -- the education of our children, and how technology can be used to expand educational opportunities and improve student achievement for all students.
"The first bearing that we held on this issue was conducted in my home State of Delaware.
"At that hearing, we received testimony from Governor Tom Carper, Delaware's Secretary of Education Iris Metts, and nine other State and local leaders in our State's efforts to integrate technology into the classroom. "The witnesses in Delaware told us of innovative programs and strategies that will lead Delaware's schools into the next millenium.
"We learned a great deal from that hearing, and I look forward to learning a great deal from today's panel of witnesses.
"We hope to come away from this morning's hearing with not only an understanding of how different States and school systems are using technology to improve education, but also with recommendations on how we, at the national level, can better assist States and local communities to use technology in improving America's schools.
"In recent years, funding for education technology programs has dramatically increased at the national level.
"In fact, Federal funding for education technology programs authorized under title III of ESEA alone has increased from $52.6 million in FY 1995 to $698 million in FY 1999.
"However as part of that growing support, so many programs have sprung up that we are faced with a situation where there is inadequate coordination among the programs at the federal level.
"This forces school administrators to waste hours of time and money (in some cases to hire consultants) to fill out applications for federal education technology funds.
"The U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) has reported that there are over 27 federal programs -- administered by 5 different federal agencies -- which provide funding for education technology to K-12 schools and to libraries.
"Federal assistance ranges from grants to States and local school districts for education technology authorized under ESEA -- to tax incentives for corporate donations of computer technology for elementary and secondary education -- to establishment of the E-rate.
"The primary education technology programs that are under the jurisdiction of our Committee however, are those authorized in title m of ESEA, including:
The National Challenge Grants for Technology in Education; and
The Technology Literacy Challenge Fund.
"However, if we are to be successful in providing the kind of assistance to States and local school districts that will be necessary for the continued successful integration of technology into the classroom, we must look beyond just the programs authorized under the technology title of ESEA.
"We must find a way to consolidate, or at the very least allow States and local school districts to integrate the different funding streams that are available for technology in ways that allow for a truly coordinated and cohesive education technology effort.
"Support for education technology must lead to increased academic performance -- not just the presence of new computers in the classroom or access to the Internet.
"Recent studies have found that education technology can have a positive impact on student achievement, but only when used by well- trained teachers.
"In fact, studies on the use of technology in the classroom ,stress the need for: improved teacher training; the integration of technology into the education process -- including curriculum development that effectively integrates technology; adequate access to technology; and careful planning.
"While we are still in the process of determining what exactly we will do with regard to education technology as part of our consideration of ESEA this year, you can expect that technology will be a major focus of any reform.
"It is essential that any reforms in federal education legislation get funding into the hands of local educators in the most efficient manner, so that they can determine the priorities and needs of their students.
"The question is, what is the best way to support successful technology efforts at the State and local level?
"I invite you to work with us in development of the legislation to reauthorize ESEA, and particularly on that portion of the legislation dealing with education technology.
"I look forward to your testimony, I know that it will be most helpful to us in our efforts."
END


LOAD-DATE: May 13, 1999




Previous Document Document 226 of 317. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: ESEA, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.