Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: ESEA, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 314 of 317. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

 View Related Topics 

JANUARY 26, 1999, TUESDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 781 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF
CHUCK HAGEL
UNITED STATES SENATOR
NEBRASKA
BEFORE THE SENATE HEALTH, EDUCATION LABOR AND PENSION COMMITTEE
SUBJECT - SENATORS' PERSPECTIVES ON EDUCATION ISSUES

BODY:

Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for calling this timely hearing.
Education is an issue which is important to all of us. I look forward to working closely with you and the rest of the Committee on legislation that better serves the interests of parents, educators and schools.
As you know, I am new to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. I sought a seat on this Committee mainly because it has jurisdiction over federal education policy -- an area in which I want to get more deeply involved.
Like many Americans I am concerned that our Nation's children are not being adequately prepared to compete in a global economy or learning the skills they need to become productive citizens. Too few U.S. students are entering and succeeding in the fields of mathematics, natural science, computer science, and engineering. The time has come to do something about it. Now is the time for education renewal.
The 106th Congress and this Committee have a historic opportunity to change the course of federal education policies. We will consider legislation this Congress to reauthorize both the Goals 2000: Educate America Act and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. But we are not living in 1965 or 1994. It is 1999. Education needs have changed, and they are changing at an accelerating rate.
In preparation for the debate this Committee and this Congress will have in the coming months on education, I recently conducted an education roundtable discussion with a group of Nebraska's educators and visited an elementary school in Omaha. I also engaged in a series of meetings with Nebraska state and local education officials, teachers, administrators, and parents.
The one point these teachers, administrators and parents continually made to me, and I say this in light of what the President proposed in his recent State of the Union address, is this --they don't want any more federal involvement in education. They don't want more big government programs. They want to be relieved of the burdensome paperwork and regulations imposed by the federal government so that they can do what they do best -- teach our children.
Nebraska's educators also told me something else that is very important to our schoolchildren. And this is where I believe the federal government is missing the point. They tell me that parents need to better prepare, better educate their children before they enter school -- from ages 1 to 5 or 6.
When a teacher gets a child at 5 or 6, that child is a molded product. That child is a molded product which can be worked and developed, but the foundation is already set. Parents, not teachers, or schools or the federal government, must take full responsibility for building and educating our nation's children. They are the ones who instill values, morals, and honesty and teach children to respect each other.
This is not to say that I don't believe the federal government has a role in education. I believe it does. The federal government, the President, Members of Congress have the responsibility and the forum from which to speak about the importance of education -- the bully pulpit if you will.
However, the federal government should not be the education bully, which is what the President's education proposals represent. The President's initiatives are an unprecedented intrusion into a field traditionally controlled by States.
Education is the most local of issues -- one that must be decided by parents, teachers and local school boards. In my view, education cannot and should not be run by federal decree or by centralized bureaucratic regimes. In Nebraska, we are fortunate to have very good schools with dedicated teachers and educators like you. However, in order to compete in a global economy, we need to make sure that all our Nation's young people receive the best education possible, as well as the tools they need for a successful and meaningful life. In my view, we can improve education by ensuring that more decisions are made at the local level.
The education bills and proposals we consider this Congress are vehicles that can be used to ensure that Nebraska and America' s current education needs and priorities are being met. They also provide the chance to better prepare our children for an uncertain future.
Mr. Chairman, the hearing you are holding this morning is the beginning of an important reauthorization process and I look forward to hearing from our colleagues. Their knowledge of education and their legislative proposals will help us develop bipartisan solutions to the education issues that come before this Committee.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
END


LOAD-DATE: January 27, 1999




Previous Document Document 314 of 317. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: ESEA, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.