Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: elementary and secondary education act

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 117 of 240. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune  
The Tampa Tribune

October 25, 1999, Monday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NATION/WORLD, Pg. 10

LENGTH: 535 words

HEADLINE: The relentless minority education gap;


BODY:


A task force of prominent educators has found that the performance gap between black, Hispanic  and American Indian students and their white and Asian counterparts persists across the  socioeconomic spectrum, from kindergarten through graduate school, according to a new report.

The survey is just the latest in a large stack of reports on the national achievement gap. What  is needed is more accountability of future efforts to close it.

The task force that did the study calls for a strategy of "affirmative development" that would  emphasize minority performance at all levels rather than focusing on enrollment in colleges and  universities. Again, that sounds like a worthy goal, but a strategy to accomplish it is more  important.

ONE NOTABLE FEATURE of this latest report is that it doesn't request more spending. While there  may be a need for increased outlays in some areas, money has not been the problem in trying to  raise achievement levels. One of the primary goals of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act,  for instance, was to improve the performance of disadvantaged children. Some $ 120 billion has been  spent to that end since its adoption in 1965. Yet many of the targeted children continue to lag far  behind other students.

Lack of accountability is one of the major reasons. One University of Michigan professor told a  Senate committee: "It is disappointing that having spent more than $ 150 billion on those  compensatory education services, we still do not know which practices and programs are particularly  effective. ... For Head Start and Title I, these evaluations have not even attempted to ascertain  in a rigorous and systematic manner which components of their programs have been successful."

One of the report's recommendations is for high schools and elementary schools to share  information on programs that improve minority achievement, and it urges collaboration between  minority colleges and mainstream institutions, as well as between community colleges and four-year  schools. To facilitate this, the U.S. Department of Education could act as a clearinghouse for  proven teaching methods.

The Clinton approach has been more micromanaging of states and school districts, while  Republicans in Congress advocate more local autonomy. The GOP position makes sense when we consider  Washington's track record on education and, more important, the need for states to form their own  reform priorities (e.g., reduced class size, more charter schools, improved teacher training or new  textbooks and computers).

If we are to close the achievement gap in education, there must be greater accountability,  higher standards and more choice in schools. This can be accomplished if local administrators are  allowed to incorporate their states' federal aid into their innovative education agendas.

With Head Start, Title I and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we have spent billions  of dollars over the years to try to provide the best education for all children, regardless of  their parents' income. If we can at least agree to try something different and powerfully focused,  that will be a good start.

NOTES: EDITORIALS

LOAD-DATE: October 26, 1999




Previous Document Document 117 of 240. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: elementary and secondary education act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.