OSHA Speeches
Every worker has the right to a safe and healthful
workplace.
OSHA Speeches -
Table of Contents
- Record Type: Speech
- Subject: Every worker has the right to a safe and healthful
workplace.
- Information Date: 06/12/1999
- Presented To: American Federation of State , County and
Municipal Employees Regional Safety and Health Conference
- Speaker: Jeffress , Charles N.
"This document was published prior to the publication of OSHA's final
rule on Ergonomics Program (29 CFR 1910.900, November 14, 2000), and
therefore does not necessarily address or reflect the provisions set forth
in the final standard."
Charles N. Jeffress American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees Regional Safety and Health
Conference Baltimore, Md. June 12, 1999
- As a federal employee and a former state employee, I feel at home
among AFSCME members. I appreciate where you are coming from and what
you are trying to do. I also feel welcome thanks to Jordan Barab,
formerly with AFSCME. He's been a most helpful addition to our team at
OSHA, and we appreciate your sending him our way.
- Every worker has the right to a safe and healthful workplace. That's
what the Occupational Safety and Health Act says. But for some public
employees, safety and health on the job is a privilege rather than a
right. That's because if their agencies won't do the right thing, they
have nowhere to turn. Many, like those in Pennsylvania or Delaware, are
not covered by federal or state OSHA programs.
- President Clinton and Vice President Gore want to change that. If
you work for the government-federal, state or local-you shouldn't have
less protection than someone doing the same job for a private employer.
If anything, government should set an example. It's time to give public
employees first class treatment instead of second class citizenship!
- Government employees operate heavy equipment, care for mentally ill
and handicapped patients, service water and sewer facilities, maintain
park and wilderness areas and keep order in prisons. Government workers
are exposed to hazardous chemicals. Some of us have jobs that require
repetitive motions or heavy lifting. Some may be threatened by dangerous
animals or criminals with guns.
- Safety and health on the job is a serious issue. It's not a minor
matter to be delegated to the least senior staffer and relegated to a
dusty manual at the bottom of a bookshelf. We need to give safety and
health protection for public sector workers the serious attention it
deserves.
- OSHA now covers postal workers. That's a step in the right
direction. But we need to go further. Congressman Andrews on February 23
introduced the "Fairness for State and Local Workers Act" to see that
all state, county and municipal workers are covered by OSHA. On March
17, Senators Wellstone and Kennedy introduced the "Federal Employees
Safety Enhancement Act" to extend full OSHA coverage to all federal
workers. Public employees deserve the same rights that private sector
workers enjoy!
- The workplace has changed significantly during the 20th
Century. We've moved from an agrarian economy to an industrial economy
to a service-based, technology-driven, information-age economy. Many of
the old hazards remain with us. But we also must address emerging issues
among high tech workers and service providers.
- One of the issues that has come to the forefront over the past
decade is work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Each year more than
600,000 U.S. workers suffer serious injuries as a result of overexertion
or repetitive motion on their jobs. These injuries are painful and
require a long time for recovery. Some will result in lifelong
disability.
- I've talked with workers who continue to suffer from work-related
musculoskeletal disorders long after their initial diagnosis. Severely
injured workers may never be able to return to their jobs. They may not
even be able to handle simple, every day tasks. Some can't comb their
hair, pick up a baby, push a shopping cart or reach for a book on a high
shelf.
- These injuries are not inevitable. They're not just a part of
growing older. They don't have to happen. And they're not caused by
playing tennis or golf on the weekends.
- They're not cheap either -- for workers or their employers. They
cost business $15 to $20 billion each year in workers' compensation
costs alone. The cost to workers can be even higher -- their livelihoods
and the simple pleasures of everyday life.
- Now is the time for us to move forward with an ergonomics standard.
We want employers to develop ergonomics programs to protect workers at
high risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
- Some have charged a lack of "sound science" linking musculoskeletal
disorders to work. Baloney! NIOSH analyzed 600 ergonomic studies in
1997. In 1998, the National Academy of Sciences verified the connection,
concluding that the greater the physical stress, the greater the
likelihood of injury. Further, the Academy pointed out that most people
face their main exposure to physical stresses, such as heavy lifting and
repetitive motion, on their jobs. Most important the Academy noted that
reducing physical stress on the job reduces the risk of injuries.
- In other words, interventions work. Ergonomics programs work.
- Unfortunately, some would rather study the problem forever rather
than adopt the solutions already proven successful. More than 140
representatives have signed on as co-sponsors of Congressman Blunt's
bill to stop OSHA's ergonomics standard. Senator Bond has 35 co-sponsors
in the Senate on a similar bill. We cannot let them succeed.
- Another study will support the findings and conclusions of the
earlier NIOSH and NAS evaluations, which critics refused to accept as
definitive. And those who are adamantly opposed to an OSHA ergonomics
standard won't support the findings of the second NAS review they're
insisting on. To our critics, it didn't matter what the Academy found
last year. It didn't matter what NIOSH found before that. And the next
study won't matter either. The naysayers have never seen a regulation
they like, and they are determined to stop this one. We cannot simply
stand by for two more years while a million more workers
experience work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
- You know, and I know, it's time to move forward. Ergonomics programs
work. They prevent painful injuries. They reduce costs. They increase
productivity. And this administration is determined to make effective
ergonomics programs the law of the land. With AFSCME's help, we will
succeed.
- OSHA is working to address other health issues that affect public
employees as well. We need to better protect the 5.6 million healthcare
workers at risk for needlesticks. More than half a million of them
experience needlesticks each year. Those injuries can lead to deadly
bloodborne illnesses such as AIDS and hepatitis.
- We received nearly 400 responses when we asked last fall for
information on preventing needlesticks. The data were clear: Safer
needle devices mean fewer sticks. But not enough healthcare facilities
are using these improved devices.
- Just purchasing a box of updated syringes is not sufficient,
commentors told us. Employees must be involved in choosing the devices,
establishing safer work practices and training fellow workers to take
advantage of the new technology.
- OSHA has adopted a three-pronged approach to address this health
concern. We've proposed changes in our recordkeeping rule that will
require employers to record injuries resulting from contaminated needles
and sharps. We'll publish a final recordkeeping rule this fall.
- We will also revise our bloodborne pathogens compliance directive to
reflect the newer and safer technologies now available. And finally, we
will take steps to amend the bloodborne pathogens standard by placing
needlestick and sharps injuries on our regulatory agenda this fall.
Together, these measures will serve to increase the use of safer devices
and lower the risk of needlesticks for healthcare workers.
- Another issue for many healthcare workers is potential exposure to
tuberculosis. We proposed a standard covering workplace exposure to TB
in October 1997. As you know, one of the controversial issues in this
rulemaking has been the feasibility and scope of coverage for workers at
shelters for the homeless.
- Toward that end, next week we will re-open the tuberculosis record
for 45 days to introduce the findings of a study on tuberculosis in
homeless shelters. We're also seeking public comment on recommendations
from AFSCME and others to expand coverage to parole and probation
workers and to include all social workers under the standard. We expect
to publish the final TB standard next spring.
- On another front, we are addressing the issue of personal protective
equipment. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission ruled
last year that it was unclear who should pay for PPE, employees or
employers. OSHA has proposed to clarify its original intention that
employers must pay for this equipment unless it is prescription glasses
or steel-toed shoes. The comment period on this proposal is open now,
and the hearing will be on August 10.
- Another area of great concern to you and to OSHA is traffic safety.
The leading cause of death on the job in the U.S. is traffic events.
AFSCME has one of OSHA's Susan Harwood Training Grants to train workers
involved with highway construction in hazard identification and
avoidance.
- While OSHA will not be regulating over-the-road vehicles, we are
particularly concerned about safety in highway construction work zones.
This affects not only construction workers but those public employees
who may be inspecting the job to verify that the work is proceeding as
planned.
- In one case, in my home state of North Carolina, a state Department
of Transportation worker was spray-painting markings to show where
barrels should go to protect construction workers for the next day's
work. But there was no barrier between the worker and the traffic and
the worker was facing away from oncoming vehicles. He was struck and
killed by a driver who moved out of the travel lane to pass several
trucks. He was one of about 700 workers killed last year in construction
work zones.
- Safety in highway construction work zones is going to be
increasingly important as our nation spends $200 billion over the next
four years to fix our roadways. With all the additional work, as many as
1,000 private and public sector workers could die if we don't actively
work to prevent these deaths.
- The Department of Transportation will be taking the lead and working
with the National Safety Council to address this issue. We've agreed to
assist with this project. We need to alert the motoring public and
workers who spend time in construction zones to the risks and how to
avoid them.
- Public sector workers provide the services that build our
communities. You teach children, fight fires, nurse veterans, catch
crooks, maintain parks and manage the details of our life together.
You're protecting and defending our mutual interests as citizens.
- We will defend your personal interests as well-as workers entitled
to a safe and healthful working environment. Federal OSHA may not yet
cover you. But we're working for you as we develop standards, conduct
outreach and education programs and identify opportunities for
partnerships.
- We appreciate the support AFSCME has given OSHA over the years --
and in some cases some pretty strong prodding. You pushed us to develop
standards on ethylene oxide, bloodborne pathogens and tuberculosis. You
pressed us to create workplace violence guidelines. And in each case you
provided comments and helpful information to support the need for action
on OSHA's part.
- Don't stop now. There's so much more we need to do. And we need your
help to do it.
- We want every worker to go home whole and healthy every day.
Municipal sanitation workers, city firefighters, county teachers, state
highway patrol officers and federal environmental planners are all part
of this vision. Working with your union, the President, Vice President
Gore, Secretary Herman and OSHA are committed to making this vision a
reality.
OSHA Speeches -
Table of Contents |