S 1070 IS
106th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1070
To require the Secretary of Labor to wait for completion of a
National Academy of Sciences study before promulgating a standard, regulation or
guideline on ergonomics.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 18 (legislative day, MAY 14), 1999
Mr. BOND (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. VOINOVICH, Ms.
SNOWE, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. LOTT, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr.
MACK, Mr. COVERDELL, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. KYL, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr.
ABRAHAM, Mr. GREGG, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. HELMS, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. CRAPO, Mr.
BENNETT, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CHAFEE, and Mr. BROWNBACK)
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
A BILL
To require the Secretary of Labor to wait for completion of a
National Academy of Sciences study before promulgating a standard, regulation or
guideline on ergonomics.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Sensible Ergonomics Needs Scientific
Evidence Act' or the `SENSE Act'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The Department of Labor, through the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (referred to in this Act as `OSHA'), has announced that it
plans to propose regulations during 1999 to regulate `ergonomics' in the
workplace. A draft of OSHA's ergonomics regulation became available in
February 19, 1999.
(2) In October 1998 Congress and the President agreed that the National
Academy of Sciences shall conduct a comprehensive study of the medical and
scientific evidence regarding musculoskeletal disorders. The study is
intended to evaluate the basic questions about diagnosis and causes of such
disorders. Given the uncertainty and dispute about these basic questions,
and Congress' intention that they be addressed in a comprehensive study by
the National Academy of Sciences, it is premature for OSHA to propose a
regulation on ergonomics as being necessary or appropriate to improve
workers' health and safety until such study is completed.
(3) An August 1998 workshop on `work related musculoskeletal injuries'
held by the National Academy of Sciences reviewed existing research on
musculoskeletal disorders. It showed that there is insufficient evidence to
assess the level of risk to workers from repetitive motions.
(4) A July 1997 report by the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) reviewing epidemiological studies that have been
conducted of `work related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper
extremity, and low back' showed that there is insufficient evidence to
assess the level of risk to workers from repetitive motions. Such evidence
would be necessary to write an efficient and effective regulation.
SEC. 3. DELAY OF STANDARD, REGULATION OR GUIDELINE.
The Secretary of Labor, acting through the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, may not propose or issue in final form any standard,
regulation, or guideline on ergonomics until--
(1) the National Academy of Sciences--
(A) completes a peer-reviewed scientific study, as mandated by Public
Law 105-277, of the available evidence examining a cause and effect
relationship between repetitive tasks in the workplace and musculoskeletal
disorders or repetitive stress injuries; and
(B) submits to Congress a report setting forth the findings resulting
from such study; and
(2) the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which
the final report under paragraph (1)(B) is submitted to Congress.
END