HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 13 of 105. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

November 14, 2000, Tuesday ,THIRD EDITION

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. C1

LENGTH: 810 words

HEADLINE: Material from Reuters and the Associated Press was used in this report.;
OSHA SETS REPETITIVE STRESS RULES NEW CURBS WOULD SEEK TO ERADICATE INJURIES; PARTISAN BATTLE ENDS

BYLINE: By Michael Rosenwald, Globe Staff

BODY:
The Clinton administration announced rules yesterday aimed at eradicating the 460,000 workplace injuries attributed each year to repetitive motions on the job. The move capped a partisan battle that had bitterly divided Republicans and the White House.

For Heidi Eberhardt, the news was a victory of sorts.

   The Somerville resident suffers from a devastating repetitive strain injury: tendinitis in both thumbs, hands, and forearms. Eberhardt said she developed the injury while working for an Internet publishing company, typing on her computer eight hours a day, five days a week.

When the pain is at its worst, she can't turn her door key or even button her pants. Eberhardt, 32, had to leave her job. She now works 12 hours a week for the Coalition of New Office Technology in Boston, which advocates for the health and safety of office workers.

While she and other proponents of the measure cheered the news, Republicans and business leaders who have wrangled over the cost spoke out against it.

Representative Bill Goodling, a Pennsylvania Republican who is chairman of the House Education and Workforce Committee, said the new standards, which go into effect on Jan. 16, follow "a pattern of overstepping authority and issuing controversial new policies."

The National Association of Manufacturers, which said it would challenge the new rules in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, called them rushed, scientifically weak, and a payoff to labor unions.

Baruch Fellner, lawyer pressing the suit for the association and other business groups, said that the rules are too vague and are not supported by science, that the economic analysis by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration was fatally flawed, and that the agency had violated procedures in developing the standard.

"We fully expect to prevail in this lawsuit," the Reuters news agency quoted Fellner as saying.

OSHA has argued that the ergonomics program would save businesses an average of $9.1 billion each year, according to Charles N. Jeffress, the assistant secretary of labor who oversees the agency. It would also prevent about 230,000 reported repetitive stress injuries a year, and perhaps 230,000 that go unreported.

The program covers more than 102 million workers at 6.1 million work sites nationwide. It calls for companies both to provide educational information about such workplace injuries and to take steps to curtail them. Eberhardt said no such measures were in place at the company where she says her injuries occurred.

The problem of repetitive stress injuries is particularly acute in Massachusetts. Last year, 51 percent of work-related illnesses and injuries that forced workers to miss more than five days at work were caused by repetitive stress injuries, said Nancy Lessin, the health and safety coordinator for the state's AFL-CIO chapter.

"This is obviously taking a huge toll on workers in this state," Lessin said. "It's taking a huge toll on their health and well-being. And it's also costing a lot of money in terms of worker compensation and lost productivity."

OSHA's Jeffress said the government estimates that employers will need to spend $4.5 billion a year to comply with the standard.

But other calculations differ dramatically. The Employment Policy Foundation, a nonpartisan research and education foundation in Washington that focuses on workplace trends, estimates that the changes will cost businesses $125.6 billion a year. Jeffress calls that number "greatly inflated" and "wildly exaggerated," adding that OSHA's predictions were based on company case studies.

Detractors also said the initiative was rushed into implementation for fear that a White House led by the Republican presidential candidate, George W. Bush, would delay or kill the project altogether.

Jeffress shrugged off that assertion and pointed out that OSHA has worked on the measure for 10 years and published a proposal a year ago.

"This is not a partisan or political issue," Jeffress said. "It's about saving workers from getting hurt. It's about preventing injuries. We know that it's time to act."

Proponents say the measure was needed sooner rather than later. What's especially alarming to many are the increasing number of repetitive stress injuries surfacing among younger workers. From 1992 to '96, Massachusetts public health officials recorded more than 200 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome involving workers younger than 25.

Lessin said people should think about those affected by these injuries before squabbling over dollar figures or statistics.

"This is not just about numbers and costs in terms of dollars," Lessin said. "Whether it's a back injury or a repetitive stress injury, this is not only taking a toll on people's lives at work, but on their ability to function in the world."

LOAD-DATE: November 14, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 13 of 105. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.