HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 62 of 105. [Next Document]

Copyright 1999 The Buffalo News  
The Buffalo News

November 30, 1999, Tuesday, CITY EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL PAGE, Pg. 2B

LENGTH: 477 words

HEADLINE: OSHA'S PROPOSED NEW RULES

BODY:


In what has become its own form of repetitive motion, the federal government once again is trying to enforce national standards to prevent repetitive-strain workplace injuries -- and, once again, has run into strong business and political opposition.

A word of advice to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Ignore the risks, and keep trying. American workers should be able to expect that they won't be hurt by the jobs they are asked to do over and over again, and there should be a way to craft workplace regulations that protect workers without crippling businesses.

A number of major industries, it turns out, already have launched many of the reforms proposed by the new regulations -- and are reaping economic benefits from reducing the amount of time and productivity lost to worker injuries. OSHA estimates the annual cost of the new rules at $ 4.2 billion, and the savings in workers compensation claims and other costs at $ 9 billion.

While business groups estimate much higher costs, the large industries already dealing with ergonomics have found that most workplace problems can be fixed for less than $ 200. Studies also have found that firms with programs to combat repetitive stress injuries have far fewer reported injuries, and less lost work time.

The fight to institute regulations based on ergonomics -- a relatively new science that tries to keep tasks within the physical limitations of workers -is now a few years old. Business-backed Republicans beat it down in 1995, and the proposed new rules unveiled by OSHA this week are a weakened version of last year's proposals. The Clinton Administration wants the rules in place by the end of the president's term, but Congress will have a whole year of hearings to try to block them.

Business objects most to a requirement that sidelined workers receive all benefits and 90 percent of their wages for up to six months -- higher than the 60 percent for worker's comp -- while workers shifted to light duty receive 100 percent of their normal wages. But the rules also require that ailments be documented by medical professionals and linked to the direct tasks of a given job to curtail abuses.

Despite the heated opposition of business groups and the knee-jerk threats of court action, though, the government should focus on making these worker-protection laws work. With proper safeguards to protect smaller businesses and ward off false claims, they can help reduce the kinds of injuries -- including hernias, carpal tunnel syndrome and chronic back pain -that Labor Department statistics indicate affect 1.8 million workers a year.

Coming up with reasonable guidelines over the course of the next year shouldn't be beyond the scope of either bureaucrats or congressmen. Business should realize that the American work force is an asset worth protecting.

LOAD-DATE: December 2, 1999




[Previous Document] Document 62 of 105. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.