HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 72 of 105. [Next Document]

Copyright 1999 The Columbus Dispatch  
The Columbus Dispatch

November 23, 1999, Tuesday

SECTION: NEWS, Pg. 1A

LENGTH: 717 words

HEADLINE: NEW REPETITIVE- STRESS RULES URGED BUSINESSES WORRY GOVERNMENT'S PLAN WILL BE TOO COSTLY

BYLINE: Lornet Turnbull, Dispatch Business Reporter

BODY:


The federal government is proposing new rules that it says will lessen the chance of repetitive-motion injuries for 27 million Americans who labor on computers or assembly lines.

"Real people are suffering real injuries that can disable their bodies and destroy their lives,'' Secretary of Labor Alexis Herman said yesterday. "The good news is that real solutions are available.''

The measure, announced yesterday by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, is drawing opposition from businesses.

Businesses face an estimated $ 4.2 billion in annual costs to fix job sites and pay workers recovering from injuries, opponents say. Moreover, the proposal would fail to assure the prevention of even one injury, said Al Lundeen, director of the National Coalition of Ergonomics, an employer group.

"Under the OSHA proposal, workplaces would now become laboratories for government experimentation,'' he added.

Existing workplace safety regulations are aimed mainly at preventing mishaps, such as falls. The new rules would require employers to minimize everyday physical -- or ergonomic -- stresses of certain jobs.

That could include jobs that require lifting patients from a hospital bed to handling baggage at the airport to typing in claims forms.

Fewer than 30 percent of employers have effective ergonomics programs in place, the government said.

The proposed regulations, long promised by the Clinton administration, had been delayed for years as the Republican-controlled Congress, under pressure from business groups, repeatedly passed legislation requiring more scientific studies.

The House voted to put another hold on the rules this fall, but the Senate adjourned for the year Friday without acting. After lawmakers left town this weekend, the administration rushed to roll out its proposal.

The Labor Department says that 1.8 million workers annually suffer work-related "musculoskeletal disorders'' which includes such things as carpal tunnel or neck and back strain. Some 600,000 people miss some work because of them, it said.

In Ohio, back strain -- the No. 1 work- place-related injury -- represented $ 200 million of the $ 1.7 billion in claims in 1996, said Jim Samuel, spokesman for the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation.

Under the federal proposal, businesses would be required to create a program to identify problems and teach employees what to guard against. Additionally, the standards will require employers to improve conditions at work once a worker has reported an ergonomic injury.

Employees who must be assigned to lighter duty during recovery from ergonomic injury would be guaranteed normal pay and benefits. A worker who must leave the job altogether would be guaranteed 90 percent pay and full benefits during recovery.

Peter Wray, executive director of the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, said the regulation is long overdue.

"We represent a lot of clerical employees who end up sitting in front of a computer terminals for long stretches,'' Wray said.

"Anecdotally, we hear lots of complaints about carpal tunnel, neck injuries.''

Across central Ohio, a number of companies have built safety programs stressing ergonomics.

"In some ways we exceed the new proposals,'' said Ron Lietzke, spokesman for Honda of America Manufacturing in Marysville.

Honda, for example, has someone assigned to address ergonomics at its assembly plants, Lietzke said. And the company also provides information to associates about the risks of their jobs as well as training on prevention.

Dave Cowden, a coordinator at Longaberger, told participants at town meetings across the state this summer that the new rule won't be too great a change for his company.

Longaberger has a full-time safety department and recommends stretching frequently and reporting of repetitive-stress injuries.

The company also has an on-site health center to assist employees. "We for years now have been trying to be extremely proactive with ergonomics,'' Cowden said.

The proposed rules, scheduled to be published in today's Federal Register, cannot become final before next year following a comment period that will include hearings in Washington and other cities starting in February.

Wire services contributed to this story.

LOAD-DATE: November 24, 1999




[Previous Document] Document 72 of 105. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.