HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 104 of 105. [Next Document]

Copyright 1999 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Inc.  
St. Louis Post-Dispatch

February 20, 1999, Saturday, FIVE STAR LIFT EDITION

SECTION: NEWS, Pg. 15

LENGTH: 1180 words

HEADLINE: WORKPLACE RULES AIM TO CUT REPETITIVE-MOTION INJURIES

BYLINE: Judith Vandewater; Of The Post-Dispatch

BODY:


* Federal government proposes standards that could force businesses to change work stations or redesign facilities.

The federal government announced Friday a draft of workplace-safety standards aimed at preventing repetitive-motion injuries.

The standards are intended to prevent injuries like Cynthia Steenberg's carpal tunnel syndrome. Steenberg, a 45-year-old administrative assistant at Washington University, says she ignored the tingling numbness in her hands until a glass she was holding shattered on her kitchen floor. She had not felt it slip from her fingers.

Now, she undergoes physical therapy twice a week and gets cortisone treatments for the inflamed tendons in her wrist.

Musculoskeletal disorders such as Steenberg's account for 34 percent of all work days lost to injuries and illness, and for $ 1 of every $ 3 paid out in workers compensation claims.

If approved, the standards could force some employers, mainly in the industrial sector, to alter work stations, redesign facilities or change tools and equipment.

Business groups said they oppose the standards. "This hopelessly vague draft is a blank check for OSHA inspectors," said Peter Eide, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's manager for labor law. "It would require all American businesses to become full-time experts in ergonomics, a field for which there is little if any credible evidence."

The AFL-CIO said that it likes the regulations but that they should be strengthened and should apply to more industries. The construction, maritime and agriculture industries are exempt from the proposal.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is seeking comments on the draft. The agency said the policy could change dramatically before it publishes proposed standards in the Federal Register later this year.

The draft standards draw on the experience of thousands of companies that have started programs to reduce repetitive-strain injuries. The standards cover manufacturing operations and manual handling operations where employees are routinely required to lift objects or people. And they may be applied to most workplaces, including offices, if a work-related repetitive stress injury is reported after the standards take effect.

The proposed standards may spark a political fight. Rep. Cass Ballenger, R-N.C., chairman of a House panel on work force protections, said he would fight against what he called the "ill-conceived" regulation until there is scientific proof to back it up.

"Medical researchers must answer fundamental questions surrounding ergonomics before government regulators impose a one-size-fits-all solution," Ballenger said.

Congress has put a stop to such standards before. In 1995, the agency stopped work on a set of draft standards because of congressional opposition, said Barbara Silverstein, who was in charge of OSHA's ergonomics rule-making at the time.

"It's well past due," Silverstein said. "We clearly have a lot of musculoskeletal injuries in this country and workers who are constantly in trouble because of it."

She now directs research on safety and health assessment and prevention for Washington state's Department of Labor and Industries.

The standards require companies to set up an ergonomics program to identify and control potential hazards before injuries occur. They also would require ongoing education of supervisors and employees and medical attention for injured workers.

A worker who suffers a repetitive-strain injury would be entitled to a transfer, for up to six months at the same salary, to a job that does not aggravate the injury.

Ergonomics refers to the fit between people and the machines and products they use. Lynn Strother, executive director of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society in Santa Monica, Calif., said that principles of ergonomics are employed in the design of everything from a toothbrush to a control room in a nuclear plant.

Strother said that whatever costs a manufacturer incurs in designing user-friendly equipment pays off in reduced workers' compensation claims.

Dr. Scott Jones, corporate medical director for SSM Corporate Health Services in St. Louis, said most large employers understand the economic benefit of reducing workplace injury. The proposed regulation could make small and medium-sized companies more focused on prevention and education, an advancement he applauds.

Jones said that researchers are unclear about what causes repetitive stress injury or why, when two people perform the same task, only one may develop the disorder.

The medical literature shows that carpal tunnel syndrome may be related more to aging than to occupation, Jones said. Only meatpacking, a job that is performed in a refrigerated plant, has been definitely linked to the development of carpal tunnel.

Back injuries, which would also be covered under the proposed regulations, also may be more of a degenerative than an occupational hazard, Jones said.

Jones said OSHA appears to be calling for problems associated with the degenerative processes of aging to be attacked as work-related problems and addressed by design and worker education.

Paula Bohr, director of the occupational health and ergonomics laboratory at the Washington University School of Medicine, said that while more workers are becoming aware of cumulative stress injuries, most still do not seek attention for joint stiffness, or limited motion, until their pain or limited mobility interferes with their ability to perform.

"Most of us have been raised with the concept that aches and pains are a normal part of working life." Sometimes something as simple as changing the grip on a tool can prevent cumulative trauma injury, she said.

Jones said that employers can cut down on repetitive injuries by adjusting a work station to fit a worker, or simply teaching employees to use equipment correctly.

"We say, let's look at where you are having injuries. Let's not catch mice. Let's plug up the holes."

Robert J. Kelley, president of the St. Louis Labor Council AFL-CIO, said computer terminals are the workbenches of the 1990s. "This is a far more subtle way of incurring injury, but it is as debilitating. Take a look at supermarket checkers the next time you are shopping and you will find at least one checker wearing a wrist brace."

Marty Yadon is executive director of CompManagement, a managed-care health network operated by HealthLink Inc. About 20,000 employers with a combined work force of 450,000 employees use the CompManagement network in Missouri and central and Southern Illinois. Yadon said CompManagement registers about six new carpal tunnel cases a month.

Glenda Krupp, President of Double G Ham Co. in Pacific, said that she and her partner and brother, Greig Gatzert, added ergonomically designed knives when they built a new plant in 1997. The goal was to reduce strain on workers' wrists.

Krupp said the company also switches tasks among its 15 workers to reduce the opportunity for repetitive stress injuries. "We want healthy employees," she said.

GRAPHIC: PHOTO Photo by WENDI FITZGERALD / POST-DISPATCH - Tina Brooks stretches to put grocery items onto a checkout conveyor belt at Schnucks Supermarket on Cass Avenue, north of downtown. Store manager Jerry Birke said checkers no longer are required to lift groceries from the cart.


LOAD-DATE: February 20, 1999




[Previous Document] Document 104 of 105. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: repetitive stress injuries, OSHA
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.