About Manufacturing Our Pro-Growth Agenda E-Commerce Portal Member Services
April 19, 2001 
Home  » Human Resources Issues  » OSHA/Ergonomics/Safety & Health  » OSHA Ergonomics

OSHA Ergonomics

Printer friendly version of this page

Ergonomics Cost Survey


DATE: January 13, 2000
TO: OSHA Policy Subcommittee ** TIME-SENSITIVE **
FROM: Jenny Krese, (202) 637-3132, jkrese@nam.org
SUBJECT: ERGONOMICS Cost Assessment Survey

INTRODUCTION
Barring any extension of time, the comment period on the ergonomics regulation ends March 2. Please fill out the attached form to assess the proposed regulation’s financial impact on you, and fax it back to us A.S.A.P. so we can gauge the aggregate impact on NAM members.

Important information:

  • For a summary of the ergonomics regulation, go to our website at: http://www.nam.org/hrp. The document is titled "Ergonomics Q&A Analysis."
  • Contact Charles Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of OSHA, to ask for a 60-day extension of time for filing comments. A sample letter and his address can be found on our website at http://www.nam.org/hrp under "Letter to OSHA Secretary Charles Jeffress."
  • Please also forward a copy of your request for an extension to The Honorable William M. Daley, Office of the Secretary, Room 5854, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230, Phone: 202-482-2000, Fax: 202-482-2741, Email: WDaley@doc.gov.
  • To report OSHA excesses, call the NAM’s OSHA hotline at (202) 637-3415, or email us at osha@nam.org.
  • To access a copy of OSHA’s ridiculous letter on home work – and our response – go to our main web page at: http://www.nam.org/hrp.

HOW MUCH WILL OSHA’S ERGONOMICS STANDARD COST YOUR COMPANY?

The rulemaking initiative outlined by OSHA consists of six broad components, which have far-reaching ramifications. Any manufacturer whose employees have experienced a single "musculoskeletal disorder" (or "MSD") – either caused or aggravated by work – is required to develop an ergonomic program that meets OSHA's criteria

1. Initial Set-up and Management of Ergonomics Program:
Estimated Annual Hours for All Participants
(Include a total of time for head management personnel, participating employees, compliance management personnel, safety/ergonomic committee members, trainers, and medical team.)

** Click here for definitions **

No. of Hours   X

Cost Per Hour

= Total

a) Management Leadership & Employee Participation

_______

$_______

$_______
b) Hazard Information & Reporting _______

$_______

$_______
c) Job Hazard
Analysis & Control
_______

$_______

$_______
d) Training _______

$_______

$_______
e) Medical Management _______

$_______

$_______
f) Program Evaluation _______

$_______

$_______

Total estimated cost of management activities: 1g.) $______
 

2. Annual Cost of Program Support Services

a) Consulting Services
(est. # of days x $1,000/day)

$_______

b) Legal Services
(est. fees for legal guidance and compliance review)

$_______

Total est. annual costs of support services:

2c.)

$______

 

3. Work Station/Process Redesign

a) Number of company employees who, in 1999, actually claimed that they experienced "work related" injuries of muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments and joints, including many strains and conditions of ordinary life (e.g., "low back pain", "sciatica", "trigger finger", "rotator cuff syndrome", "tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome, among others)

________

b) Number of company employees who, in 1999, could have claimed that they experienced "work related" injuries of muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments and joints, including many strains and conditions of ordinary life (e.g., "low back pain", "sciatica", "trigger finger", "rotator cuff syndrome", "tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome, among others), or injuries of muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments and joints that "contributed to" or were "aggravated by" work activities

________

c) Estimate the average cost of each work station or process design change per employee

$________

Total est. annual costs of work station or process redesign:  

(Line (b) x line (c)) = 3d.)

$______

 

4. Work Restriction and Protection

a) Number of company employees who, in 1999, actually received workers’ compensationfor work-related injuries mentioned in 3(b) above.
________
b) Number of company employees who, in 1999, could have claimed workers’ compensation for injuries mentioned in 3(c) above.
________
c) What percentage of weekly pay does your state workers’ compensation provide?
________%
d) 90% of workers’ weekly pay - amount from line (c) =

$________

Total Amount: Line (d) x line (b) =

4e.)

$______
 

5. Light Duty

a) Number of employees who actually received light duty as a result of injuriesdescribed in 3(b) above ________
b) Number of employees who could receive light duty under the standard as proposed, even for injuries not caused by, but only aggravated by work ________
c) Does light duty come with any reduction in pay? ______yes ______no
d) If yes, what is the difference between 100% of employees pay and the reduced amount of pay? $________
Total cost for work restriction and protection [Line (b) x line (d) x duration] 5e.) $______
 

TOTAL anticipated costs of compliance with OSHA’s ergonomics standard

(add lines 1g, 2c, 3d, 4e and 5e): $______

_________________________________
(company name)

_________________________________
(city and state)

_________________________________
(contact name)

_________________________________
(phone number/email address)

# of employees: __________

Please fax your completed survey back to Jenny Krese at (202) 637-3182 A.S.A.P.

Please note: Your input only will be used in formulating NAM's comments and testimony in the OSHA rulemaking. Your company name will not be used, nor will specific data submitted to the rulemaking record be attributed to your organization.


DEFINITIONS

The proposed rule contains the following definitions of the elements of Question #1:

  1. Management Leadership and Employee Participation – Employers must assign program responsibilities, provide necessary training, information, authority and resources; examine existing policies and practices to ensure they encourage reporting; and communicate periodically with employees concerning the company's ergonomics program and musculoskeletal concerns. Covered employers also must provide employees with a way to report MSD signs and symptoms, and provide ways for employees and their designated (union) representatives to be involved in the program. By way of illustration, in its discussion of "management leadership", the agency states that employers must examine their current policies – including the use of safety incentive programs, and mandatory post-injury drug tests – to determine if they discourage early reporting of MSD signs and symptoms.
  2. Hazard Information and Reporting – Employers must set up a way for employees to report MSD symptoms and get prompt responses; provide information to employees on MSD hazards, their signs and symptoms and the importance of early reporting, how to report and a summary of the OSHA standard. Companies must evaluate employee reports and symptoms to determine whether a covered MSD has occurred.
  3. Job Hazard Analysis and Control – Analyze "problem jobs" (i.e., jobs in which a covered MSD is reported) to identify ergonomic risk factors, and eliminate them, reduce them to the extent feasible or materially reduce them. Track progress in eliminating or materially reducing MSDs. Use engineering controls (which are preferred, where feasible) or administrative/work practice controls to achieve MSD changes.
  4. Training – Provide training about MSD hazards, the company's ergonomics program and measures for eliminating or materially reducing hazards (initially, periodically and at least every three years).
  5. Medical Management – Make MSD management available promptly whenever a covered MSD occurs, including obligations to provide access to a health care professional, obtain a written opinion, accommodate work restrictions, and provide compensation protections. OSHA's "MSD management" component would require maintenance of earnings and benefits in excess of workers’ compensation during periods of restricted work covered by the standard (100% of earnings for those on light duty, and 90% of earnings for those removed from the workplace), for periods of up to six months.
  6. Program Evaluation – At least every three years, consult with employees in problem jobs, identify significant deficiencies in the program, evaluate the functioning of program elements, promptly take action to ensure that MSD hazards are effectively eliminated or materially reduced.

Back to survey

Prepared for the NAM, © 2000. By Peter Susser, Esq., Littler Mendelson, P.C., 1225 I Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005

NAM STAFF CONTACT: Jennifer Krese, (202) 637-3132, jkrese@nam.org, Human Resources Policy Department

 
National Association of Manufacturers
1331 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20004-1790
(202) 637-3000
(202) 637-3182 (fax)
manufacturing@nam.org

© 2001 National Association of Manufacturers
The NAM does not release customer information to third parties
except in conjunction with NAM-sponsored programs.
The NAM's Privacy Policy

We Rated with RSACi Safe For Kids SafeSurf Rated