Ergonomics Cost
Survey
DATE: January 13,
2000 TO: OSHA Policy Subcommittee **
TIME-SENSITIVE ** FROM: Jenny Krese, (202)
637-3132, jkrese@nam.org SUBJECT:
ERGONOMICS Cost Assessment Survey
INTRODUCTION Barring any extension of time, the comment
period on the ergonomics regulation ends March 2. Please fill
out the attached form to assess the proposed regulation’s
financial impact on you, and fax it back to us A.S.A.P. so we
can gauge the aggregate impact on NAM members.
Important
information:
- For a summary of the
ergonomics regulation, go to our website at: http://www.nam.org/hrp.
The document is titled "Ergonomics Q&A Analysis."
- Contact Charles Jeffress,
Assistant Secretary of OSHA, to ask for a 60-day extension
of time for filing comments. A sample letter and his address
can be found on our website at http://www.nam.org/hrp
under "Letter to OSHA Secretary Charles Jeffress."
- Please also forward a copy of
your request for an extension to The Honorable William M.
Daley, Office of the Secretary, Room 5854, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th & Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20230, Phone: 202-482-2000, Fax: 202-482-2741, Email: WDaley@doc.gov.
- To report OSHA excesses, call
the NAM’s OSHA hotline at (202) 637-3415, or email us at osha@nam.org.
- To access a copy of OSHA’s
ridiculous letter on home work – and our response – go to
our main web page at: http://www.nam.org/hrp.
HOW MUCH WILL
OSHA’S ERGONOMICS STANDARD COST YOUR
COMPANY?
The rulemaking initiative
outlined by OSHA consists of six broad components, which have
far-reaching ramifications. Any manufacturer whose employees
have experienced a single "musculoskeletal disorder" (or
"MSD") – either caused or aggravated by work – is
required to develop an ergonomic program that meets OSHA's
criteria
1. Initial Set-up and Management of Ergonomics
Program: Estimated Annual Hours for All
Participants (Include a total of time for
head management personnel, participating employees, compliance
management personnel, safety/ergonomic committee members,
trainers, and medical team.)
** Click here for definitions
**
|
No. of Hours X
|
Cost Per
Hour |
=
Total |
|
a)
Management Leadership & Employee
Participation |
_______ |
$_______ |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Hazard Information &
Reporting |
_______ |
$_______ |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) Job Hazard Analysis
& Control |
_______ |
$_______ |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) Training |
_______ |
$_______ |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e) Medical Management
|
_______ |
$_______ |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) Program Evaluation
|
_______ |
$_______ |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated cost
of management activities: |
1g.) |
$______ |
2. Annual
Cost of Program Support Services |
|
|
|
a) Consulting Services
(est. # of days x $1,000/day) |
$_______ |
|
b) Legal Services (est.
fees for legal guidance and compliance review) |
$_______ |
|
|
|
|
Total est. annual
costs of support services: |
2c.) |
$______ |
3. Work
Station/Process Redesign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Number of company
employees who, in 1999, actually claimed that
they experienced "work related" injuries of muscles,
nerves, tendons, ligaments and joints, including many
strains and conditions of ordinary life (e.g., "low back
pain", "sciatica", "trigger finger", "rotator cuff
syndrome", "tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome,
among others) |
|
|
|
|
________ |
b) Number of company
employees who, in 1999, could have claimed that
they experienced "work related" injuries of muscles,
nerves, tendons, ligaments and joints, including many
strains and conditions of ordinary life (e.g., "low back
pain", "sciatica", "trigger finger", "rotator cuff
syndrome", "tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome,
among others), or injuries of muscles, nerves, tendons,
ligaments and joints that "contributed to" or were
"aggravated by" work activities |
|
|
|
|
________ |
c) Estimate the average cost
of each work station or process design change per
employee |
$________ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total est. annual costs of
work station or process redesign:
|
|
(Line
(b) x line (c)) = 3d.) |
$______ |
4. Work
Restriction and Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
a) Number of company
employees who, in 1999, actually received
workers’ compensationfor work-related injuries
mentioned in 3(b) above. |
|
|
|
|
________ |
b) Number of company
employees who, in 1999, could have claimed
workers’ compensation for injuries mentioned in 3(c)
above. |
|
|
|
|
________ |
c) What percentage of weekly
pay does your state workers’ compensation
provide? |
|
|
|
|
________% |
|
|
|
|
|
d) 90% of workers’ weekly pay
- amount from line (c)
= |
$________ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amount: Line (d) x
line (b) =
|
4e.) |
$______ |
5. Light
Duty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Number of employees who
actually received light duty as a result of
injuriesdescribed in 3(b) above |
________ |
|
|
|
|
|
b) Number of employees who
could receive light duty under the standard as
proposed, even for injuries not caused by, but only
aggravated by work |
________ |
|
|
|
|
|
c) Does light duty come with
any reduction in pay? |
______yes |
______no |
|
|
|
|
|
d) If yes, what is the
difference between 100% of employees pay and the reduced
amount of pay? |
$________ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost for work
restriction and protection [Line (b) x line (d) x
duration] |
5e.) |
$______ |
TOTAL anticipated
costs of compliance with OSHA’s ergonomics standard
|
(add lines 1g, 2c, 3d, 4e and
5e): |
$______ |
_________________________________ (company name)
_________________________________ (city
and state)
_________________________________ (contact
name)
_________________________________ (phone
number/email address)
# of employees: __________
Please fax your completed survey back to Jenny Krese at
(202) 637-3182 A.S.A.P.
Please note: Your
input only will be used in formulating NAM's comments and
testimony in the OSHA rulemaking. Your company name will not
be used, nor will specific data submitted to the rulemaking
record be attributed to your organization.
DEFINITIONS
The proposed rule contains
the following definitions of the elements of Question
#1:
- Management
Leadership and Employee Participation – Employers
must assign program responsibilities, provide necessary
training, information, authority and resources; examine
existing policies and practices to ensure they encourage
reporting; and communicate periodically with employees
concerning the company's ergonomics program and
musculoskeletal concerns. Covered employers also must
provide employees with a way to report MSD signs and
symptoms, and provide ways for employees and their
designated (union) representatives to be involved in the
program. By way of illustration, in its discussion of
"management leadership", the agency states that employers
must examine their current policies – including the use of
safety incentive programs, and mandatory post-injury drug
tests – to determine if they discourage early reporting of
MSD signs and symptoms.
- Hazard
Information and Reporting – Employers must set up a
way for employees to report MSD symptoms and get prompt
responses; provide information to employees on MSD hazards,
their signs and symptoms and the importance of early
reporting, how to report and a summary of the OSHA standard.
Companies must evaluate employee reports and symptoms to
determine whether a covered MSD has occurred.
- Job Hazard
Analysis and Control – Analyze "problem jobs"
(i.e., jobs in which a covered MSD is reported) to identify
ergonomic risk factors, and eliminate them, reduce them to
the extent feasible or materially reduce them. Track
progress in eliminating or materially reducing MSDs. Use
engineering controls (which are preferred, where feasible)
or administrative/work practice controls to achieve MSD
changes.
- Training – Provide training about
MSD hazards, the company's ergonomics program and measures
for eliminating or materially reducing hazards (initially,
periodically and at least every three years).
- Medical
Management – Make MSD management available promptly
whenever a covered MSD occurs, including obligations to
provide access to a health care professional, obtain a
written opinion, accommodate work restrictions, and provide
compensation protections. OSHA's "MSD management" component
would require maintenance of earnings and benefits in excess
of workers’ compensation during periods of restricted work
covered by the standard (100% of earnings for those on light
duty, and 90% of earnings for those removed from the
workplace), for periods of up to six months.
- Program
Evaluation – At least every three years, consult
with employees in problem jobs, identify significant
deficiencies in the program, evaluate the functioning of
program elements, promptly take action to ensure that MSD
hazards are effectively eliminated or materially
reduced.
Back to
survey
Prepared for the NAM, ©
2000. By Peter Susser, Esq., Littler Mendelson, P.C., 1225 I
Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC
20005 |