Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 79 of 234. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Omaha World-Herald Company  
Omaha World-Herald

May 4, 2000, Thursday SUNRISE EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 6;

LENGTH: 628 words

HEADLINE: House Vote Sets Up Battle Over Extra Special-Ed Funds

BYLINE: MATT KELLEY

SOURCE: WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

DATELINE: Washington

BODY:
House members sounded a bipartisan call Wednesday for boosting federal support to special education programs, an idea likely to grow more divisive later in this election year. Under the bill passed 421-3 Wednesday, funding for local school districts' special-education programs would grow by $ 2 billion per year in each of the next 10 years. At that rate, supporters say, Congress would meet commitments it made in 1975 to shoulder 40 percent of the costs incurred by local districts in meeting federal requirements to educate disabled students. "It's the right thing to do," said Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb. Wednesday's vote was to increase funding under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA. All six House members from Nebraska and western Iowa voted for the bill. Rep. Bill Barrett, R-Neb., a member of the House Education Committee, said the measure would accelerate a four-year effort to increase funding for special education. "It's been very slow," Barrett said. "This really gets us on a target until 2010. Now we've got something to shoot at." But even with Wednesday's lopsided vote in the House, sending the additional special education funds to local districts will be at the center of a partisan fight this year between congressional Republicans and Democrats led by President Clinton. Both sides are intent on proving their commitment to education in an election year. Their philosophies clash, however, over how to distribute additional funding. "The big fight is going to be over appropriations," said Joel Packer, a lobbyist with the National Education Association. Republicans generally prefer block grants and additional funds for special education, a method they say fulfills a federal commitment to local districts while freeing up local tax dollars for other uses. Clinton, meanwhile, wants smaller increases for special education in favor of programs to hire 100,000 new teachers and build new classrooms. Nebraska schools spent about $ 198.7million on special education during the 1998-99 school year, according to figures from the State Department of Education. About 11percent of that total - just under $ 21.5million - came from federal coffers, while the state provided about $ 127.1million, or 64 percent. Local districts spent just over $ 50million, accounting for 25 percent of the costs. "It's more expensive to serve students with disabilities," said Gary Sherman, a special education administrator with the Nebraska Department of Education. During the current school year, Nebraska and Iowa are slatedto receive $ 29.9 million and $ 48.96million, respectively, in federal special education funding. Rep. Doug Bereuter, R-Neb., said current funding accounts for 12.6percent of expenditures to educate disabled kids. Noting the unmet 40percent commitment from 1975, Bereuter called the shortfall "a classic and very damaging unfunded mandate." Bereuter said the number of special-education students in Nebraska increased by 3,700 between 1995 and 1999, a 9 percent increase. "We must fulfill our commitment to provide 40 percent of the costs of special education," he said in a statement. Barrett said school administrators from Nebraska consistently list special-education funding as one of their top needs. By passing the bill Wednesday, he said, House members are sending a message about budgetary priorities. "Government hasn't kept its word," Barrett said. Whatever increase is passed, Terry said, will give school districts more room to maneuver in their budgeting. Every dollar of special education funding frees up local dollars for teacher training, school construction or local property-tax relief. "The difference has always been made up by the local school districts," he said.

LOAD-DATE: May 4, 2000




Previous Document Document 79 of 234. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.