Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 76 of 234. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Omaha World-Herald Company  
Omaha World-Herald

May 7, 2000, Sunday SUNRISE EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 15a;

LENGTH: 1237 words

HEADLINE: Congress Turns Attention to Education

BYLINE: MATT KELLEY

SOURCE: WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

DATELINE: Washington

BODY:
With an eye toward November's election, the House and Senate last week took up education initiatives expected to spur lengthy partisan battles over a top priority of many voters. Last week's most decisive legislating happened in the House, where lawmakers voted 421 to 3 to call for stair-stepped increases in special education funding over each of the next ten years. But the bipartisan nature of that largely symbolic vote was belied by the Senate, where lawmakers engaged in a mostly partisan and lengthy philosophical debate over how best to spend federal education dollars. The basis for the Senate debate is a Republican-backed plan to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The GOP proposal seeks to trim federal paperwork and bureaucracy while giving states more say in spending decisions. The measure includes a new pilot block-grant program and a plan to enable some parents to buy special tutoring with a federal subsidy. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said the bill attempts to reverse a federal bureaucracy that provides between five and seven percent of education funding, but requires 50 percent of the paperwork. "Do we want an educational system tailored by faceless Washington bureaucrats or by local school boards and educators who know our kids by their first name?" he said. Democrats countered that the GOP proposal seeks to make political hay without providing concrete answers for schools struggling with outdated infrastructure and a shortage of qualified teachers. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, accused Republicans of offering a plan that amounts to a "retreat in our national commitment to education." "They merely punt the problem back to the states," Harkin said. "That is not leadership." Senators broke along party lines to reject a substitute bill - introduced by Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D. - composed mostly of President Clinton's education agenda. By a 45 to 54 vote, the Senate effectively killed Daschle's bill, a measure to add teachers, reduce class sizes and repair or replace older schools. Harkin and Sen. Bob Kerrey, D-Neb., voted for Daschle's substitute, while Grassley and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., opposed it. A vote on Republican plan isn't expected until late this week at the earliest. The partisan debate in Congress foreshadows a long summer and fall in which Republicans and Democrats will jockey for an electoral advantage on education issues. Education is expected to play a major role both in congressional elections and the presidential contest between Texas Gov. George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore. Hagel, who serves with Harkin on the Health Education and Labor Committee, used a conference call with Nebraska reporters last week to urge his colleagues to pay more attention to their constituents as they resume debate this week. Hagel said that while taping a program for public television last week, he was able to hear comments offered by parents, teachers and students from around the nation. He said all 100 senators would have benefited from "the great common sense of our time." "If we would do that," Hagel said, "we would do just fine." In the House, lawmakers of both parties lauded efforts to boost federal support for local school districts burdened by the high cost of educating disabled kids. The bill passed in the House calls for a $ 2 billion increase in each of the next 10 years for funds distributed under the 1975 Individual with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA. Proponents, including most Midlands lawmakers, said that rate of increase would bring the federal contribution to 40 percent of special education costs, the threshold promised by Congress in 1975. "I only wish we could have done it sooner," said Rep Bill Barrett, R-Neb., a member of the House Education and Workforce Committee. Currently, local school districts receive about $ 6 billion in IDEA funding annually, a level education officials say amounts to about 12 percent of the total cost of educating the disabled. Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., said boosting special education funding will allow districts to redirect local tax dollars for teacher hiring and training, classroom renovation and construction or property tax relief. Echoing the sentiments of Rep. Doug Bereuter, R-Neb., and most Midlands lawmakers, Terry said each additional special education dollar means more local resources for all students. "The difference has always been made up by the local school districts," Terry said. Despite that bipartisan enthusiasm, however, observers and education lobbyists pointed out that the real test will come when House members begin passing the appropriations bill later this year. It is at that point when lawmakers will make final decisions on funding specific education programs, choices sure to spark the same type of partisanship seen in the Senate. Those differences are likely to parallel the ones in the Senate this week, with Republicans pushing for fewer federal restrictions and Democrats lining up behind Clinton's more structured proposals to lower class size and improve infrastructure. Barrett, who is serving final House term before retiring, said he it's possible the process will be marked by much of the same "political gamesmanship" of previous negotiations between Clinton and congressional Republicans. "That's always around in this business," Barrett said. The special education measure received support from all six House members from Nebraska and western Iowa: Barrett, Bereuter, Terry and Reps. Greg Ganske, R-Iowa, Tom Latham, R-Iowa, and Leonard Boswell, D-Iowa. In other votes last week: The House Africa Trade Approved, 309 to 110, a bill that would open the way for expanded trade with dozens of African and Caribbean nations. The measure provides quota-free status for textile imports from certain nations, while also setting labor and civil rights standards for nations wishing to take advantage of the lowered barriers. All six House members from Nebraska and western Iowa voted for the measure. Water Approved, 416 to 5, a measure authorizing the expansion of a water conservation programs run by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The measure authorized $ 75 million in spending in each year from 2000 to 2004. All six House members from Nebraska and western Iowa voted for the measure. Stock Options Approved, 421 to 0, a measure clearing the way for companies to offer hourly employees stock options without coming under certain restriction imposed by the U.S. Department of Labor. All six House members from Nebraska and western Iowa voted for the measure. Vietnam Approved, 415 to 3, a resolution condemning human rights abuses and calling on Vietnam to hold open elections, release political prisoners and promote freedom of religion. All six House members from Nebraska and western Iowa voted for the measure. Asian Refugees Approved, by voice vote, a measure waiving certain citizenship requirements for refugees who assisted the U.S. during the Vietnam War. The bill is aimed specifically at relaxing literacy and civics requirement for Lao and Hmong veterans who already enjoy permanent residency in the U.S. Federal Contractors Approved, by voice vote, a measure that would relax standards requiring some government contractors to hold four-year college degrees. The measure was aimed largely toward computer and technology contractors.

LOAD-DATE: May 8, 2000




Previous Document Document 76 of 234. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.