aVol. 9, No. 6

September 2000

Table of
Contents

Left

Previous
Story

Next
Story

Appropriators Recommend Big Increase in Federal Education Funds But Shortchange Neediest Schools with $3 Billion Block Grant

By Jeff Simering, Director of Legislation

The House and Senate Appropriations Committees have reached a tentative agreement to increase federal education funding for fiscal year 2001 by a record $5 billion. But it is likely to trigger a presidential veto and a new round of 11th hour dickering, because the package does not include several of the Administration's education initiatives, like school construction and class size reduction.

  The new budget numbers were reached after a bidding war that saw the Administration propose a $4.5 billion increase in education funding; the House responding with a $1.6 billion increase; the Senate raising the ante with a $4.6 billion increase; and the Conference Committee then boosting the increases to over $5 billion.

Conferees particularly focused on  the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) with increases of $1.3 billion; on the 21st Century after-school programs with increases of $146 million; on Bilingual Education with increases of $51 million; and on Title VI Innovative Education Strategies. 

The Title I LEA Grant program, which has languished financially in recent years, has received a small funding increase of approximately $150 million. Appropriators are still struggling with the allotment of  Title I funds after learning that about two-thirds of the nation's school districts received no increase from last year's Title I funding increase of more than a quarter of a billion dollars.

This situation resulted from hold-harmless provisions and two state discretionary programs added during conference negotiations over the past few years. The Council of the Great City Schools is encouraging Congress to match the $448 million Title I increase recommended by the Administration, and to allot this increase to the Title I formula grants for all eligible school districts.

The most controversial action of the Conference Committee involved terminating the two year-old class size reduction program and refusing to fund the large school construction and renovation program—two top Administration priorities.

The omission by the Conferees is particularly distressing to the Council of the Great City Schools, because urban schools have the largest class sizes in the nation and the most deteriorated facilities. Congressional appropriators have rolled the prior year funding for class size reductions and new funding requested for school repair into a $3.1 billion block grant to the states.

The tentative appropriation agreements are particularly troubling to school districts with large numbers of poor children since the proposed block grant dilutes the available funding for two high-priority areas (i.e., class size reduction and school repair) and sends the $3.1 billion to districts with far less need.

The Council of the Great City Schools has voiced its opposition to this proposal because it shortchanges school districts with the greatest needs. The Council applauds the new education funding levels, but strongly disagrees with appropriators about how to target them.


Council of the Great City Schools
1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 702
Washington, D.C.  20004
(202) 393-2427 (phone)
(202) 393-2400 (fax)