YOUR ABA/WASHINGTON REPORT
End of Stalemate in Sight
ABA seeks to preserve legal aid and rights programs in Older Americans Act

BY RHONDA McMILLION

As the 106th Congress considers reauthorizing the Older Americans Act this year, the ABA is seeking to assure that the law continues to provide support for legal assistance and elder rights advocacy programs.

Enacted in 1965 and long supported by the ABA, the act established the federal Administration on Aging, which plans, advocates and delivers services. The act also provides for funding to states, which distribute it to local agencies responsible for allocating it in ways that best meet community needs. Although the funds serve the elderly regardless of income level, the program targets those with the greatest social and economic need.

The last reauthorization expired Sept. 30, 1995, but Congress continues funding through appropriations. Partisan differences over targeting services to low-income minority elders and providing free nutrition services prevented final action during the 104th and 105th Congresses. This year, however, sponsors of House and Senate bills predict they will send reauthorization to the president before the 106th Congress adjourns at the end of the year.

Meanwhile, the ABA is watching closely how Congress deals with rights advocacy and legal assistance provisions in the act.

The act requires that local agencies on aging expend a certain portion of the funds they receive under Title iii-b on legal assistance programs and target them to people in greatest social and economic need. Another priority is programs providing advice, counseling and representation on a number of issues.

Title IV funding supports several statewide senior legal hotlines, the National Center on Elder Abuse, the Long Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center and five national legal-assistance-support centers, including one maintained by the ABA Commission on Legal Problems of the Elderly. Title VII includes the long-term care ombudsman program; the elder abuse, neglect and exploitation education and prevention program; the outreach, counseling and assistance program; and coordination of elder rights advocacy resources, including legal assistance.

But under a proposed House bill, aging agencies would no longer be required to spend an adequate proportion of funds received via Title iii-b on legal assistance. The ABA fears withdrawing the requirement would deny many people their only entry to the legal system. The bill also would abolish Title VII legal aid and elder rights coordination provisions, including the role of state legal assistance developers—who the ABA believes are essential components of the comprehensive elder rights system that the act requires.

Developers coordinate elder rights advocacy, promote legal assistance, and develop alternative systems such as pro bono programs, legal hotlines and dispute resolution programs.

The House Committee on Education and Workforce approved the bill in late 1999. It never came before the full House for a vote, however, after disagreements over funding job training programs under the act.

The Senate reactivated the reauthorization issue in July when its Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions approved a bill to require funding for national legal assistance support and continue legal services for the elderly as a priority. The bill includes provisions to reduce financial support for legal services only if volunteer programs actually meet older people’s legal needs.

Keep On Advocating

Although the Senate bill’s legal services and advocacy provisions are a significant improvement over the House measure, the ABA remains concerned about provisions to curtail the responsibilities of state legal assistance developers by deleting all reference to their role in advocating for elder rights.

"Eliminating the legal assistance developer’s current responsibilities under Title VII is likely to leave states without a focal point for coordination of training, provision of current materials, and expertise on elder rights and legal assistance issues at the state level," ABA Governmental Affairs Director Robert D. Evans wrote during committee consideration of the House and Senate bills.


Rhonda McMillion is editor of Washington Letter, an ABA Governmental Affairs Office publication.