Highlighting the Importance of State-Level AdvocacyIn an effort
to bring some national attention to the importance of state-level advocacy
in every state, Alan Houseman, Director of the
Center
for Law and Social Policy (CLASP), is writing a report setting out
recommendations for states to consider in developing high quality legal
and policy advocacy at the state level. The report will emphasize that
there is not one single approach that will be successful in every state;
rather, states have developed different approaches depending on the
following factors:
- The number and mission of programs delivering civil legal aid within
the state;
- Amount of non-LSC funds available and the kind of restrictions they
carry;
- Whether there are large law firms willing to do significant pro bono
work (both litigation and legislative advocacy;
- The availability of public interest organizations with unrestricted
funds;
- Whether there are law schools willing to make resources available
directly or through clinical programs; and
- The existence of leaders (both volunteer and staff) who understand
and support the need for state level advocacy.
Fundraising AssistanceIn addition, Project staff is working with
a select group of state level advocacy organizations to help them raise
stable funds. Project staff has surveyed every state to determine the
level of state advocacy (impact litigation and administrative/legislative
advocacy) since the demise of LSC funding for state support. The surveying
revealed that there are significant disparities among the states regarding
the capacity to maintain these forms of advocacy. The Project is
collaborating with the National Center on Poverty
Law and the ABA Project to Expand Resources for Legal Services (PERLS) in
this effort.
Developing National Strategies In December, 2000 the Project
convened 20 state level advocates for a day-long meeting to discuss how
they can begin developing national strategies to expand funding for state
level advocacy, particularly in lower-resourced states. These advocates
exchanged information about foundation grants, individual donor campaigns,
attorney s fees, and collaborations with non-legal advocacy groups to
pursue private foundation and state and federal grants. They also
discussed national foundation grants to state advocacy groups working on
welfare reauthorization. The group formed a network that will meet from
time to time in person and by conference call. They also started an e-mail
list that is maintained by the National Center on Poverty Law.
Return
to State Justice Communities
|
|